<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:pp="http://www.presspage.com/rss/"
     version="2.0"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
                <channel>
                    <title><![CDATA[Think Like a Publisher - Fleur Willemijn Newsroom]]></title>
                    <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/</link>
                    <description></description>
                    <language>en</language>
                    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 06:52:29 +0200</lastBuildDate>
                    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 06:07:43 +0200</pubDate>
                    <item>
                        <title>What to do with LinkedIn in 2026</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/linkedin-algorithm-secrets/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/linkedin-algorithm-secrets/</guid><pp:caseid>557347</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>The LinkedIn algorithm secrets, September update</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p><span>Not seeing results on LinkedIn? Your feed filled with slop?</span></p><p><span>It’s not you, it’s—</span></p><p><span>Actually. It is you.</span></p><p><span>Most people use LinkedIn wrong, then wonder why it’s not working. Usually, it comes down to three mistakes.</span></p><p> </p><p><span>First, <strong>treating LinkedIn as a one-way platform</strong>. You post and leave, then wonder why nothing comes back. But LinkedIn is a two-way platform. Reach and engagement run on the same mechanism: interaction.</span></p><p><span>LinkedIn’s algorithm looks at whether you show up in other people’s comments, whether you reply to your own, and whether you’re actually part of a conversation. Your activity helps determine who gets to see your content.</span></p><p> </p><p><span>Second, <strong>not deciding what you actually want from LinkedIn and being consistent about it</strong>: do you want to build your position as a thought leader, or do you want to build a pipeline and generate business? Because that shapes your strategy: what you post, which formats you use, how often you post, and who you engage with.</span></p><p><span>By the way, ‘I just want to be there because everybody is there’ is also a strategy. But realise that dropping something in once in a while and expecting results is hoping for a miracle. LinkedIn is unlikely to give you one.</span></p><p> </p><p><span>Third, <strong>expecting your feed to be useful without showing LinkedIn what useful means to you</strong>. Your feed is shaped by what you engage with and what you spend time on. And that includes the rubbish that annoys you.</span></p><p><span>If a post irritates you and you stop to read the whole thing, LinkedIn sees attention.</span></p><p><span>You can influence what shows up in your feed. The strongest signals are the ones that show genuine interest: <strong>save a post, write a substantial comment, and spend time actually reading it</strong>. A proper comment of 15+ words gives LinkedIn considerably more information than a quick ‘Great post!’.</span></p><p><span>In other words, don’t hate-read your way into a terrible feed and then blame LinkedIn for it.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>The actual reach numbers most people don't know</span></h2><ul><li><span><strong>Median engagement rate</strong> on LinkedIn: 2.50%</span></li><li><span><strong>Median impressions per post</strong>: 860 for a personal profile, 500 for a company page</span></li></ul><p><span>Also worth knowing: posting more isn’t automatically better.</span></p><ul><li><span>Post once a week: 2.4% engagement, 679 impressions. Push to <strong>four or five a week: 2.6%, 870 impressions</strong>, the peak. Go past seven a week: 1.79%, 586 impressions. Worse than doing less. (source: AuthoredUp)</span></li></ul><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>The time most don't want to invest</span></h2><p><span>Whether your goal is business or becoming a thought leader, doing LinkedIn properly takes <strong>roughly 4 to 8 hours a week</strong> to source and produce content and keep up with what works. </span></p><p><span>Plus at least <strong>half an hour a day</strong> actually engaging with other people and improving your feed.</span></p><p><span>That engagement part is what almost everyone skips. And it’s the part that helps your posts get reach. The same goes for your feed. If you want LinkedIn to show you better content, you have to give it something to work with.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>AI and automated outreach is a mistake</span></h2><p><span>An automated AI comment or message is still one-way communication dressed up as interaction. LinkedIn is getting better and better at recognising and hiding low-quality, obviously AI-generated comments and posts. And people are even better at spotting them.</span></p><p><span><strong>Keep in mind: people still want to do business with people.</strong> Not with automation opening with the standard ‘Hey {first name}’.</span></p><p><span>I don’t engage with automated outreach. If you couldn’t be bothered to write something personal to me, why should I be bothered to do business with you?</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>Why I'm still here</span></h2><p><span>I don’t expect LinkedIn to generate direct business, and I’m not chasing reach or likes. If a handful of people read my posts and they actually make them think, that’s a win for me.</span></p><p><span>My payoff is being seen as someone worth listening to, a.k.a. a thought leader.</span></p><p><span>And I know that <strong>potential clients check my profile</strong> before they hire me. LinkedIn doesn’t necessarily bring them in. It helps close the deal once I’m already in their mind.</span></p><p><span>That works because I treat LinkedIn as a two-way platform and I’m intentional about my content and how I use it. It’s just smaller and slower than most LinkedIn gurus would have you believe.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>My take</span></h2><p><span>I genuinely don’t care which strategy you pick: business, positioning, or simply being there. Pick one and act — and set your expectations — accordingly.</span></p><p><span>If you want reach, you have to show up in other people’s comments and conversations. That same interaction also shapes what LinkedIn gives back to you in your feed.</span></p><p><span>So complaining about your reach while you post and disappear, or complaining about your feed while you keep consuming rubbish, is rather missing the point.</span></p><p><span>It’s not LinkedIn, it’s you.</span></p><p><span>Well, most of the time.</span></p><p><span>Sometimes LinkedIn is to blame for lower reach or an ugly feed. Algorithm updates roll out, things shift, and glitches happen. LinkedIn isn’t sacred. They get things wrong too and</span> occasionally make a mess.</p><p><span>But before blaming the tool, it’s worth looking at our own behaviour first. What are we posting? How are we engaging? What are we spending our time on?</span></p><p><span>Because quite often, LinkedIn is simply giving us more of what we’ve been giving it.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Sources: </strong><span>The numbers above come from AuthoredUp's analysis of over 3 million LinkedIn posts, March 2025 through February 2026. Give them a follow and read ‘</span><a href="https://authoredup.com/blog/linkedin-metrics-to-track" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>LinkedIn Metrics to Track</span></a><span>’ and ‘</span><a href="https://authoredup.com/blog/best-performing-content-on-linkedin" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>Best Performing Content on LinkedIn</span></a><span>’. Automated-comment detection and suppression confirmed by LinkedIn VP of Product Gyanda Sachdeva, via Social Media Today. The algorithm keeps changing, so treat these as a snapshot, not a permanent rulebook. And get </span><a href="https://sales.richardvanderblom.com/content-algorithm-playbook/?affiliate=fleurwillemijn" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>Richard van der Blom's Algorithm Insights Report</span></a><span>, which also breaks down which content formats currently perform best (affiliate link, I earn a very small fee if you buy through it).</span></p><p> </p><p>  </p><h2>More insights on LinkedIn's algorithm secrets</h2><p>I collected all my monthly updates on the<a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/linkedin-algorithm-secrets-the-archive/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> All LinkedIn algorithm secrets</a> archive page.</p><ol style="text-align:left;"><li>How the algorithm builds its profile of you, which influences your reach</li><li>Your connections stopped being your distribution</li><li>Specificity beats authenticity</li><li>Nurturing: the work after you publish</li><li>The 9 rules for commenting effectively</li><li><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/linkedins-algorithm-is-basically-a-nightclub-bouncer-deciding-who-gets-in-and-who-not/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn's algorithm is basically a nightclub bouncer, deciding who gets in and who not</a></li><li><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-5-linkedin-tips-no-one-tells-you/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The 5 LinkedIn tips no one tells you</a></li><li>LinkedIn’s new 2026 algorithm, what changed?</li><li>LinkedIn is in 2026 of the most cited sources in AI-generated answers</li><li>The power of dark reach, the invisible spread of your content</li><li>How to control what you see in your feed; your dwell time</li><li>Be aware of the ‘Pod policy’ for friends and co-workers</li><li>Reposting, ‘instant’ is still the best, and reposts from employees have -30% impact</li><li>How to set up employee advocacy and employee-generated content</li><li>‘Open to work’ as a red flag</li><li>Your profile matters and makes a huge difference</li><li>Sources and who to follow</li></ol><p>  </p><p>And please, before jumping to any conclusions, check the original sources for all insights, nuances, and details. As with everything, these secrets have context.</p><p> </p><p>    </p><hr /><p>    </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,750+ professionals</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span>→ </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">    </p><hr /><p>    </p>]]></description><pp:quotes><pp:quote>
                    <pp:quotename><![CDATA[Fleur Willemijn van Beinum]]></pp:quotename>
                    <pp:quotetext><![CDATA[Don't make the mistakes I made]]></pp:quotetext>
                </pp:quote></pp:quotes><category><![CDATA[social,LinkedIn,strategy,B2B]]></category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:04:46 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/b4054ad4-caf9-422d-9bdc-767f6544a7ae/500_linkedinsecretsseptember2026.png?59167" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/b4054ad4-caf9-422d-9bdc-767f6544a7ae/500_linkedinsecretsseptember2026.png?59167</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/b4054ad4-caf9-422d-9bdc-767f6544a7ae/linkedinsecretsseptember2026.png?59167</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[LinkedIn secrets september 2026]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>53% can&#039;t tell their content apart from the competition&#039;s</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/53-cant-tell-their-content-apart-from-the-competitions/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/53-cant-tell-their-content-apart-from-the-competitions/</guid><pp:caseid>789385</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>No wonder, 40% never wrote down what makes them different</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>HubSpot just surveyed 1,505 marketers for its <a href="https://hubspot-state-of-marketing-2026.replit.app/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">State of Marketing 2026 report</a>. 53% say they can't differentiate their content in an AI-saturated market. </p><p>Most will tell you they have a POV. Almost none of them can say it in one sentence.</p><p><strong>→ AI didn't cause the sameness. It just exposed it.</strong></p><p>When everyone has the same tools, the only edge left is the one thing AI can't generate: a <a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/ai-turns-content-scale-into-a-differentiation-crisis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">point of view</a> (POV). If you haven’t written that down, that’s a leadership problem, dressed up as a marketing issue.</p><p> </p><p>   </p><p>Here’s where it went wrong:</p><p>   </p><h3><span>1. When you use AI, you sound like your competitor.</span></h3><p>86% of marketers now use AI. Using the same models, running on the same training data, and defaulting to the same "safe" tone. No wonder every brand starts sounding like every other brand.</p><p><span><strong>→ </strong></span><strong>Unless someone actively fights to build and guard your brand's POV.</strong></p><p>   </p><h3><span>2. </span>Volume pressure, without a quality gate</h3><p>83% of marketers say they're expected to produce more content than ever. AI scaled the volume. Human oversight didn't scale with it.</p><p><span><strong>→</strong></span><strong> AI didn’t make your content bland. Nobody stopping it did.</strong></p><p>If your team is hitting the highest quota, that's not an accomplishment. That’s a sign you have no POV and an identity crisis.</p><p>   </p><h3>3. No POV in equals generic content out</h3><p>AI amplifies whatever you hand it. Give it nothing distinctive, and you get the same generic content back. Just faster and louder.</p><p><strong>→ 40% of companies still haven't written down what makes them different.</strong></p><p>And chances are, they’re heavily represented in the 53% who can’t tell their content apart from the competition’s.</p><p> </p><p>  </p><p>The good news: this is fixable:</p><p>  </p><h3>1. Put your POV in writing</h3><p>This is the root fix, the other two depend on it. It's your starting point before you touch the tools.</p><p><span><strong>→</strong></span><strong> One sentence: what does your company believe that your competitors don't or won't.</strong></p><p>   </p><h3><span>2. </span>Make your POV a constraint, not a suggestion</h3><p>If you want to break the default, make AI answer to your POV. Make it part of the instructions it gets every time. It’s a gate, not another guideline nobody reads.</p><p><strong>→ Build your POV into the system.</strong></p><p>  </p><h3><span>3. </span>Make one human responsible for what goes out</h3><p>Volume went up. Review didn’t scale with it. The fix isn’t slowing down production. It’s making one person accountable for what goes out.</p><p><strong>→ One person with the authority to say no.</strong></p><p> </p><p>   </p><h2><strong>Closing thought</strong></h2><p>Everyone has access to the same tools. Not everyone has the nerve to take a position.</p><p>That part still requires a human.</p><p>Over to you.</p><p> </p><p>    </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">  </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,750+ professionals</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">AI changes how the work gets done. I test it in my own work and write about what actually works.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>→ </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">   </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">   </p>]]></description><category><![CDATA[AI,strategy]]></category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 21:27:47 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/2eb5c67d-190d-4721-b8bc-0f7ff22a7436/500_povforai.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/2eb5c67d-190d-4721-b8bc-0f7ff22a7436/500_povforai.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/2eb5c67d-190d-4721-b8bc-0f7ff22a7436/povforai.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[POV for AI]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>2027 pulls two ways: deeper into AI, hungrier for human connection</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/2027-pulls-two-ways-deeper-into-ai-hungrier-for-human-connection/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/2027-pulls-two-ways-deeper-into-ai-hungrier-for-human-connection/</guid><pp:caseid>785711</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>Our split love is defining what comes next</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>Something is happening as AI becomes more normal: the more we use it, the more we seem to crave everything it can’t give us.</p><p>We want AI to take on the heavy lifting, help us move faster, and let us do things we couldn’t do before. But that comes with a fear of being replaced, pressure to become AI-literate, companies automating work, and a growing sense that opting out isn’t really an option.</p><p>At the same time, we crave the opposite: offline time, analogue experiences, real relationships, craftsmanship, imperfection and humour. A way to step away from an increasingly generic, algorithmic online world.</p><p><strong>That tension is going to define 2027.</strong></p><p>There’s no going back on AI. The question is what we do with it.</p><p>Use it simply to make more, faster and cheaper, and we’ll drown in increasingly efficient sameness. Use it to expand what people can create and spend the time it gives back on craft, creativity and connection. And things will get much more interesting.</p><p> </p><p>     </p><h2>Why it matters</h2><p>We need each other. Craft without AI stays small. AI without craft is slop.</p><p>AI is here to stay, so we better learn to deal with it. Four years in, the hype and the mystique are gone. AI is just part of daily work now. What hasn't caught up is us — we're still learning how to talk to machines.</p><p>Most people meet that with fear: AI will replace me. That's the wrong response. The right one is doubling down on craft and creativity, using AI to accelerate it, doing what wasn't possible before, and freeing up time for real, offline connection.</p><p>Skip that, and the slop grows exponentially. Algorithms keep feeding more of the same until everything turns generic.</p><p style="margin-left:0cm;"><span><strong>→ Obsess over craft and creativity, and dare to be different. Or everything starts to look the same.</strong></span></p><p style="margin-left:0cm;">    </p><p>3 things that are happening:</p><ol><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>AI earned its place to do what humans can't</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Analogue rise because of AI</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Recognizable human and humor, because of creativity</strong></li></ol><p> </p><p>     </p><h2>What to do from a brand's perspective: don't use AI as an excuse to cut costs</h2><p>Most companies aren't afraid, they're doing the maths. Cut a part of the team, or keep the team and make them produce more of the same, faster — which feeds the slop. Leadership sees savings; the people see their jobs in danger.</p><p><strong>→ Instead, redirect the freed up time toward human craft and analogue reconnection.</strong></p><p>There's an older problem underneath this one. AI is moving through companies the way social media and content did — hyped, fast, everywhere, and owned by no one. No single leader owns the overarching view.</p><p style="margin-left:0cm;"><span><strong>→ The brands that win in 2027 won't use AI to do more of the same, but cheaper. They'll use it to become better and, as a result, more profitable. The biggest gamechanger? They'll put one person in charge of AI, with stakeholders in all domains.</strong></span></p><p style="margin-left:0cm;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0cm;">     </p><h2>From a human perspective: double down, don't defend</h2><p>Fear makes people defensive — protect the job, prove you're still needed, keep pace with every new tool.</p><p><strong>→ Update your mindset and stack your skills.</strong></p><p>First, improve your quality. Invest heavily in your skills. Skills in your craft. And skills in learning how to talk to machines and integrate AI into your daily work. AI is not a fancy search engine or a dumb assistant you can boss around. It's a smart, eager coworker who's available 24/7 and always happy to help.</p><p>Then, use AI to do what you alone couldn't do before. Because you improved your skills first, the output when working with AI will be better, faster, and at scale. And the time that AI gives back to you? Spend it again where AI can't follow you — on your craft, your point of view, your creativity. And invest it in real, analogue relationships.</p><p style="margin-left:0cm;"><span><strong>→ The people who matter in 2027 aren't keeping up with AI. They're using it to buy back time — then filling that time with something unmistakably theirs.</strong></span></p><p style="margin-left:0cm;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0cm;">     </p><h2>Five examples</h2><p>Explained by example, all 5 are the winners at Cannes Lions in 2025 and 2026.</p><p>     </p><h3><strong>Claude Film, “Can I Get a Six Pack Quickly?” and “How Can I Communicate Better With My Mom?”</strong></h3><p>It didn't just use AI, it made an argument about it. Two Anthropic Super Bowl LX spots, released days before the game, timed right after OpenAI announced it would start running ads. (<a href="https://youtu.be/WBcM3ZUnQoE?si=bbBWbFPKP9zHpxaA" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Six Pack video</a>, <a href="https://youtu.be/-BQV7yTp_bo?si=-IKQpolzMYGo90pr" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Communications with Mom video</a>)</p><p>The spots <strong>make fun of AI assistants that answer badly</strong>, positioning Claude as the sharper alternative the moment the market's biggest player entered advertising.</p><p>Won Film Grand Prix plus Gold, Silver Film, Silver Creative Strategy. Mother London, dir. Jeff Low, Biscuit Filmworks</p><p>     </p><h3><strong>1001 Optometry, “The Hidden Eye Test”</strong></h3><p>It's <a href="https://youtu.be/eBGXpPUGfZo?si=jbzG-f6PNtfj4YRz" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">AI engineering a test that only impaired vision could pass.</a> The insight: most eye tests are built around what you can't see. This campaign flipped it.</p><p>Billboards and visuals, <strong>crafted with AI-designed color, contrast, and composition, hid phrases like “eye test” or “eyecare”</strong> inside high-fashion imagery — visible only to people with certain vision impairments. Spotting the hidden message was the diagnosis.</p><p>A year of R&D with AI artist Prospex Park, blending AI tools with traditional Photoshop technique. <a href="https://www.vml.com/work/the-hidden-eye-test" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">VML</a> — Gold Lion, Cannes 2025</p><p>     </p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/eea3dc7c-fc00-4f34-a816-2dbc4fa1c578/800_eyetestwithai.gif?x=1786720765066" alt="Eyetest with AI" width="300" /></p><p style="text-align:center;">     </p><h3>Heineken “Could Have Been a Heineken”</h3><p>A <strong>digital mechanic that pays off in an analogue reward</strong>, poking fun at <a href="https://youtu.be/ZEjMBG0Ifzs?si=5pLdjO70SsFm4F0f" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">recognizable, annoying rambling voice notes</a>: send one over three minutes long, get a free beer, redeemable only in person, only after listening to it together. Turned 280 hours of voice notes into real-world meetups.</p><p>LePub Milan & LePub São Paulo — Grand Prix, Social & Creator</p><p>     </p><h3>AXA France “Three Words”</h3><p>Unmistakably human. <a href="https://youtu.be/0m1cy99cnuY?si=BPg6HfFO7b0m9hvS" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Add three words — “and domestic violence” — to standard home insurance contracts</a>, so a policy that already covered emergency relocation for fire or flood now covers it for domestic abuse too. Survivors get immediate legal, psychological, and emergency housing support, built into the product itself. <strong>Care engineered into fine print.</strong></p><p>Publicis Conseil, Paris — Titanium, Direct, and Creative Business Transformation Grand Prix in 2025; Creative Effectiveness Grand Prix in 2026 for sustained impact</p><p> </p><h3>KitKat “The KitKat Heist”</h3><p><strong>Zero AI involved. Humor and creativity, full stop.</strong> A truck carrying 12 <a href="https://youtu.be/WRuIX6NQxD4?si=SHxu2HAyrFZhQtUk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tonnes of KitKat, 413,793 bars, hijacked </a>between Italy and Poland a week before Easter. KitKat leaned into its own playful identity instead of going defensive: $224 million in earned media in 10 days on zero spend, 31% share of voice across 93 markets, 115+ brands joining the joke.</p><p>Burson, VML, London — PR Grand Prix plus four Gold Lions</p><p> </p><p> </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p> </p><h2>Sources </h2><p><a href="https://www.canneslions.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Cannes Lions</a>, <a href="https://www.lovethework.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Love the Work</a>, <a href="https://Www.adweek.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Adweek</a>, <a href="https://www.lbbonline.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LBB online</a>, <a href="https://www.contagious.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Contagious</a>, <a href="https://www.roastbrief.us" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Roastbrief US</a>, <a href="https://www.adve" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Advertising Week</a>, <a href="https://www.thedrum.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Drum</a>, <a href="https://www.campaignlive.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Campaign Live</a>, <a href="https://Www.creativereview.co.uk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Creative Review</a>, <a href="https://www.warc.com/feed" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">WARC</a>, <a href="https://www.vml.com/work/the-hidden-eye-test" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">VML</a>, <a href="https://www.insightnews.com.au/global-acclaim-for-1001-optometrys-australian-eye-health-campaign-at-cannes-lions-2025/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Insight News</a>, <a href="https://www.adweek.com/creativity/heineken-wins-big-again-among-7-grand-prix-winners-at-cannes-lions-2026-day-4/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Adweek (Heineken)</a>, <a href="https://www.contagious.com/en/article/cannes-lions-2026-social-creator-winners-a7d0faec13bb409d906232a1ea7f6988" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Contagious (Heineken)</a>, <a href="https://www.warc.com/en/feed/axa-france-wins-creative-effectiveness-grand-prix-at-cannes-23258f5b62c146718182b2ff8b6614da" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">WARC (AXA)</a>, <a href="https://adage.com/events-awards/cannes-lions/aa-axa-three-words-creative-business-transformation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">AdAge (AXA)</a>, <a href="https://www.adweek.com/creativity/axa-and-publicis-conseil-win-prestigious-cannes-titanium-grand-prix/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">AdWeek (AXA)</a>, <a href="https://whatstrending.com/kitkat-turned-a-12-tonne-chocolate-heist-into-a-cannes-grand-prix-win/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">What’s Trending (KitKat)</a>, <a href="https://www.bursonglobal.com/work/global/the-kitkat-heist" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Burson (KitKat)</a>,  <a href="https://www.warc.com/feed/lessons-from-the-2026-creative-effectiveness-lions-winners-abf3d37718d045578a4ef0e7f979dc3f" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">WARC Lessons from Cannes 2026</a>, <a href="https://www.warc.com/feed/kitkat-heist-is-a-teaching-moment-for-nestle-8100dbb6081041149edc4b9442a83106" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">WARC KitKat Heist</a>, <a href="https://www.warc.com/feed/going-behind-the-scenes-with-a-cannes-lions-jury-5edad7eb288d496992439b7d9ecdcc2e" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Behind the Scenes with Cannes Jury</a>, <a href="https://www.warc.com/feed/axa-france-wins-creative-effectiveness-grand-prix-at-cannes-23258f5b62c146718182b2ff8b6614da" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">AXA wins in Cannes</a>, For all my insights on AI, the list of sources is endless.</p><p> </p><p> </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,750+ professionals</span></h2><p>AI changes how the work gets done. I test it in my own work and write about what actually works.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>→ </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">     </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">     </p><p>   </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p>   </p>]]></description><category><![CDATA[trends,AI,strategy]]></category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 17:34:36 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/8811adc8-8302-42ef-af80-6bfdf897d7c4/500_trends2027.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/8811adc8-8302-42ef-af80-6bfdf897d7c4/500_trends2027.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/8811adc8-8302-42ef-af80-6bfdf897d7c4/trends2027.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[Trends 2027]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>Who signed off on that? Most brands can&#039;t say</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/who-signed-off-on-that-most-brands-cant-say/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/who-signed-off-on-that-most-brands-cant-say/</guid><pp:caseid>785267</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>Your editorial policy is your AI transparency policy; what it needs to include</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>You can't say who approved the last ten pieces of content your brand published. Or which ones AI touched, and how much. That's a governance gap on your website, unowned, waiting for someone outside your company to ask the question first.</p><p><strong>As of August 2nd, the </strong><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/stop-worrying-about-the-mandatory-ai-generated-label/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>EU AI Act</strong></a><strong> requires anyone publishing AI-generated text on matters of public interest to disclose it — unless that content went through human review and a named person holds editorial responsibility for it.</strong></p><p>→ That exemption is the entire case for having an editorial policy.</p><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>This isn't a content problem, it's a governance problem</span></h2><p>A CMO thinks about this as brand voice. A CEO should think about it as exposure. A competitor, a journalist, or a regulator can ask how your organization decides what gets published and how AI is involved. ‘We haven't written that down’ doesn't survive the boardroom.</p><p><span>An editorial policy is not a disclaimer. It's a <strong>public statement of who owns the content your brand puts into the world, and how.</strong> It converts an implicit practice, probably inconsistent, probably undocumented, into a standard anyone can check. Ownership, made visible.</span></p><p><span>It also does something quieter. <strong>It signals that AI at your organization is reviewed by a process, and led by a human. </strong>That's exactly where AI governance belongs: visible at the level where the organization takes responsibility for what it says.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>Nine elements, none of them optional</span></h2><p><span>A working editorial policy is short, plain and specific. It reads like a standard, not a legal shield.</span></p><ol><li><span>A one-line stance on <strong>human ownership</strong>, stated up front, not buried in a footer</span><br /> </li><li><span>A <strong>named person</strong> or role with final editorial authority, not ‘our team’</span><br /> </li><li><span>An explicit line between what AI does (drafting, research, structure) and <strong>what stays human</strong> (judgment, verification, the final word)</span><br /> </li><li><span>A <strong>verification standard</strong>, stated without hedging. ‘Facts are checked before publication,’ not ‘checked where reasonably possible’</span><br /> </li><li><span>A <strong>correction policy</strong>: what happens when something's wrong, and how readers find out</span><br /> </li><li><span>A <strong>conflicts-of-interest line</strong>: how sponsorships, partnerships or client work are kept separate from editorial content</span><br /> </li><li><span>A <strong>sourcing standard</strong>: no fabricated quotes, no unverifiable sources, ever</span><br /> </li><li><span>A <strong>review cadence</strong> for the policy itself, with a last-reviewed date. A policy nobody revisits is a policy nobody trusts</span><br /> </li><li><span>A way to reach someone with a <strong>question or a correction</strong></span></li></ol><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>Three organizations already do this</span></h2><p><span>None of these are long or read like a disclaimer. All three name state a standard, and say it plainly enough that a reader can hold them to it.</span></p><ul><li><span>My </span><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/editorial-policy/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>thinklikeapublisher.com</span></a><span> runs this at the smallest possible scale: ‘Human expertise comes first. AI is a tool. I'm the author.’</span><br /> </li><li><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/help/insideguardian/2023/jun/16/the-guardians-approach-to-generative-ai)" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>The Guardian</span></a><span> built its policy through a cross-functional working group spanning editorial, engineering, legal and commercial teams. </span><br /> </li><li><a href="https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/artificial-intelligence/ai-principles" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>Thomson Reuters</span></a><span> has ‘Data and AI Ethics Principles’, that tie back to the company's Trust Principles, a framework older than most of its current AI tools. Governance inherited from a century of editorial credibility, applied to AI rather than invented for it.</span></li></ul><p> </p><p> </p><h2>What to do</h2><p><span>Start with the nine points above. Check how many your brand can already answer.</span></p><p>The <a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/stop-worrying-about-the-mandatory-ai-generated-label/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EU AI Act</a>'s disclosure rule took effect this month. Human review and a named editorial owner are what keep your content out of that requirement, a policy is how you prove both exist.</p><p><span>Write yours before someone asks why you don't have one. </span>There’s no excuse left not to.</p><p> </p><p> </p><h3>Sources</h3><ul style="list-style-type:disc;"><li><p style="margin-left:0px;"><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/stop-worrying-about-the-mandatory-ai-generated-label/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>You probably don't need the AI-generated label</span></a></p></li><li><p style="margin-left:0px;"><a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EUR-Lex, full official Regulation text</a></p></li><li><p style="margin-left:0px;"><a href="https://ai-act-service-desk.ec.europa.eu/en/ai-act/article-50" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">European Commission's AI Act Service Desk, Article 50 text</a></p></li><li><p style="margin-left:0px;"><a href="https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/guidelines-transparency-ai-generated-content" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">European Commission, final Guidelines</a></p></li><li><p style="margin-left:0px;"><a href="https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/faqs/transparency-obligations-under-article-50-ai-act" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">European Commission FAQ on Article 50</a></p></li><li><p style="margin-left:0px;"><a href="https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/50/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Article 50: Transparency Obligations for Providers and Deployers of Certain AI Systems</a></p></li><li><p style="margin-left:0px;"><a href="https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/transparency-rules-article-50/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The EU AI Act’s Transparency Rules: A Practical Guide to Article 50</a></p></li><li><p style="margin-left:0px;"><a href="https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/faqs/transparency-obligations-under-article-50-ai-act" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Transparency obligations under Article 50 of the AI Act</a></p></li><li><p style="margin-left:0px;"><a href="https://www.searchenginejournal.com/eu-commission-article-50-ai-transparency-law-has-four-exemptions/584528/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EU Commission Article 50 AI Transparency Law Has Four Exemptions</a></p></li></ul><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><p> </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,750+ professionals</span></h2><p>AI changes how the work gets done. I test it in my own work and write about what actually works.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>→ </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p>]]></description><category><![CDATA[AI,strategy,legal]]></category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 08:06:45 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/7d68245d-a168-4972-919b-b2bad5595d5d/500_editorialpolicy.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/7d68245d-a168-4972-919b-b2bad5595d5d/500_editorialpolicy.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/7d68245d-a168-4972-919b-b2bad5595d5d/editorialpolicy.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[editorial policy]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>LinkedIn algorithm secrets, the archive</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/linkedin-algorithm-secrets-the-archive/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/linkedin-algorithm-secrets-the-archive/</guid><pp:caseid>653888</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>All you need to know about LinkedIn, and what I didn&#039;t</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>This is THE overview of all the LinkedIn algorithm secrets, dos and don'ts, and what works and doesn't.&nbsp;</p><p>→ Join 2,750+ professionals to get the latest updates in your inbox.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here, you will find the complete overview of all LinkedIn secrets, the dos and don'ts, and what works and what doesn't. Also, check out<strong> </strong><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/linkedin-algorithm-secrets/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">this month's update</a>.</p><p>I base many of my insights on Richard van der Blom's yearly <a href="https://fleurwillemijn--richardvanderblom.thrivecart.com/content-algorithm-playbook/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn Algorithm Report</a>: the most thorough, data-driven breakdown of how the platform actually works. Format performance, posting patterns, engagement mechanics. </p><p>Tactical gold. If you or your team create content on LinkedIn, <a href="https://fleurwillemijn--richardvanderblom.thrivecart.com/content-algorithm-playbook/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">get the report</a>. Full disclosure: affiliate link. You get the best LinkedIn data available. Richard buys me lunch. </p><p> </p><ol><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>How the algorithm builds its profile of you, which influences your reach</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Your connections are no longer your distribution</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Specificity beats authenticity</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Nurturing: the work after you publish</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>The 9 rules for commenting effectively</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>LinkedIn's algorithm is basically a nightclub bouncer, deciding who gets in and who does not</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>The 5 LinkedIn tips no one tells you</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>LinkedIn’s new 2026 algorithm, what changed?</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>LinkedIn is in 2026 of the most cited sources in AI-generated answers</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>The power of dark reach, the invisible spread of your content</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>How to control what you see in your feed; your dwell time</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Be aware of the ‘Pod policy’ for friends and co-workers</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Reposting, ‘instant’ is still the best, and reposts from employees have -30% impact</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>How to set up employee advocacy and employee-generated content</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>‘Open to work’ as a red flag</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Your profile matters and makes a huge difference</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Sources and who to follow</strong></li></ol><p> </p><p>→<strong> </strong><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/how-to-make-your-resume-ats-proof-with-ai-3-things-that-matter/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>How to make your resume ATS-proof</strong></a><strong>.</strong>  <span style="text-align:left;">Around 75% of companies use ATS to scan and auto-reject resumes, meaning if yours isn’t formatted properly, it might never get seen by a human.</span></p><p> </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,750+ professionals</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference. </span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span>→ </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><p> </p><p>Read more below. And please, before jumping to any conclusions, check the original sources for all insights, nuances, and details. As with everything, these secrets have context.</p><p> </p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2>1. How the algorithm builds its profile of you, which influences your reach</h2><p style="margin-left:0px;">The algorithm sees more than your posts, it has built a model of you. <span>Based on your profile, your posting history, your engagement patterns. </span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><strong>And your reach is directly connected to that.</strong> <span>It's about what the algorithm expects from you. When you post, it checks your content against that model. A match means distribution. A mismatch means suppression.</span></p><p><span><strong>→ Your topics are your territory. One post outside your lane won't kill you. A pattern of drift will.</strong></span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">Three types of posts that destroy your reach becasue the algorithm didn't expect from you<span>: </span></p><ul><li><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">You announce you're renting out your summer house. Available in August. The algorithm built a model of a senior leader.<span> It finds a property listing. </span></p></li><li><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">You share your morning routine. 5am. Cold shower. Gratitude journal. The algorithm built a model of a strategy leader. It finds a lifestyle account. </p></li><li><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">You share three lessons from your weekend run. Your audience followed you for industry insight. They're getting a training log.</p></li></ul><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>It can also be more subtle: I’ve built authority around brand marketing, content strategy and AI. Then I start posting about sales funnels and performance marketing. </span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Still marketing. Still professional. Still wrong. The algorithm has a model of me. My detour into demand gen reads as noise and a disconnect. </span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2>2. Your connections are no longer your distribution</h2><p>LinkedIn's feed is no longer built around who you know or follows you. It is built around what the platform thinks you care about. <a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/social-graph-or-interest-graph-the-rules-for-reach-and-relevance-are-changing-again/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Relationship graph to interest graph</a>. That shift changes how reach works.</p><p>→ <strong>For companies, it is a warning. Your logo won't carry you. Your executives and subject matter experts are your reach engine</strong>. </p><p>The ones who post with clarity and a real point of view and post with sharp topical focus, they can reach people who have never heard of you. If your LinkedIn presence depends solely on your company page, you are building on a foundation that is actively losing ground.</p><p>In 2026, 4 separate algorithm teams evaluate and rank every company and personal post before it travels anywhere. Each post is scored across all simultaneously. The ones that travel furthest score well across the board.</p><ul><li><strong>News.</strong> Mission: Be first, be credible. Rewards: Breaking news reactions within 60 min. Penalties: Late takes on stale news.<br /> </li><li><strong>Engagement.</strong> Mission: Quality over quantity. Rewards: 12 real comments, 200+ likes. Penalties: Shallow reactions, no discussion.<br /> </li><li><strong>Trust & Safety.</strong> Mission: Keep it human. Rewards: Authentic, distinct voice. Penalties: Spam, bait, AI-generated filler.<br /> </li><li><strong>Design & UX.</strong> Mission: Stay on platform. Rewards: Docs, carousels, text + image. Penalties: External links, off-platform redirects.</li></ul><p> </p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2>3. Specificity beats authenticity</h2><p>Reach is the old game. Engagement is the current game. And relevance and specificity is how you win it.</p><p><strong>The audience hasn't stopped engaging. They've stopped accepting anything less than something worth their time.</strong></p><p>In 2024–2025, showing up personally and honestly on LinkedIn was an edge. By late 2025, it had become one of the most overused patterns on the platform. Templated, frequently AI-assisted.</p><p>The feed was full of "here's what I learned from failure" posts that look and feel identical. These so-called authentic posts no longer stand out. They're everywhere. That vague vulnerability is now invisible.</p><p><strong>What stops the scroll in 2026 is concrete</strong>: a real client, a specific number, an actual decision. Specificity plus expertise is the new differentiator.</p><p>→ For senior leaders, that changes the brief. Not more content. Better content. One specific insight from a real situation outperforms ten polished pieces written to be broadly relatable.</p><p> </p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2>4. Nurturing: the work after you publish</h2><p>The post is not the finish line. What you do in the hours and days after hitting publish can multiply your reach by 2 to 10 times. Or leave most of that potential on the table. Nurturing is now as important as the post itself.</p><p>→ For executives, the implication is direct. <strong>Publishing without staying present is a significant waste of the reach you built.</strong> The post is the opening. The conversation keeps it going.</p><p>High-performing content in 2026 stays active in feeds for 2 to 3 weeks. The condition: it keeps generating comments and time spent.</p><ul><li><strong>The golden window is the first 1 to 4 hours.</strong> Meaningful interactions in that window generate 10 to 14 times more reach than publishing and disappearing.<br /> </li><li><strong>Authors who reply within 30 minutes generate 64% more</strong> total comments and 2.3 times more views. The reply is not courtesy. It is the mechanism.<br /> </li><li><strong>Reply with substance</strong>. An opinion, a specific follow-up question, a new angle. That scores measurably better than a thank-you or a single word.</li></ul><p>What not to do: engagement bait; ‘comment XYZ’,  engagement pods; the platform detects the pattern and penalises it, and generic two-word comments. ‘Great post’ or ‘I agree’ goes nowhere.</p><p> </p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2>5. The 9 rules for commenting effectively</h2><p>Comments are wildly underused on LinkedIn. They’re not flashy or viral, but they work. Commenting creates two-way interaction. </p><p>When people do use them, they often miss the mark. Instead of contributing meaningfully to the conversation, they default to generic, short reactions that do little to build credibility or reach.</p><p><strong>→ A comment has 15x the importance of a like </strong>(Algorithm Insights 2024 Report by Richard van der Blom)</p><p> </p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:500px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/ec1f4b23-3546-4404-889b-ff1837274391/1920_thepowerofacomment.png?x=1769758807150" alt="the power of a comment" width="500" /></p><p style="text-align:center;"> </p><h3>The common mistake</h3><p>The most common mistake? Tossing in a lazy “Totally agree!” and calling it a day. That’s not a comment. It’s background noise. It doesn’t show you’ve read the post, and it definitely doesn’t start a conversation. These comments add no context or perspective and usually get ignored by others and the algorithm.</p><p> </p><h3>1. Write 15 words or more</h3><p>Not to fill space, but to show you’ve considered the post. Longer, more thoughtful comments are far more effective in getting attention and starting a conversation.</p><p> </p><h3>2. Write it yourself, then improve with AI if needed</h3><p>Start with your own thoughts. Use AI to sharpen after you’ve written your comment, not before. AI-generated comments are easy to spot. The algorithm notices, and so do people.</p><p> </p><h3>3. Add something useful</h3><p>Respond with insight, not just agreement. Build on an idea. Ask a relevant question. Offer your perspective. The goal is to contribute something useful that sparks conversation.</p><p> </p><h3>4. A comment is not about you</h3><p>This should go without saying, but don’t drop your elevator pitch in someone else’s comments. A good comment shines light on the original post, not yourself. Think conversation, not self-promotion.</p><p> </p><h3>5. Timing matters</h3><p>Comments left within the first hour after a post goes live tend to have more impact. Early engagement helps boost the original post’s visibility, and your own comment is more likely to be seen.</p><p> </p><h3>6. Always reply</h3><p>Whether you give or get a comment, reply. Follow the same rules above. Continue the conversation. Again, the algorithm notices, and so do people.</p><p> </p><h3>7. Comment first, like second</h3><p>Your first interaction matters. LinkedIn values your very first signal, and commenting still ranks higher. This insight surfaced in 2024. It may evolve, but for now, it’s worth the small effort to write before you tap the thumbs-up.</p><p> </p><h3>8. The ‘I like yours, you like mine’ policy</h3><p>LinkedIn actively discourages this kind of mutual back-scratching. Engagement pods and coordinated likes from coworkers often do more harm than good. By default, engagement from colleagues carries less algorithmic weight than interaction from peers or strangers.</p><p>Also worth noting: when the same people always comment first on your posts, their impact decreases over time. Mix it up. Focus on real conversations, not choreographed ones.</p><p> </p><h3>9. Lastly, be you</h3><p>Be unmistakably you. Don't try to impress. Or be somebody else. People love authenticity. Especially if you're a bit upfront, quirky, nerdy, and <a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/5-tips-to-create-your-thought-leadership-content-b2b-b2c-and-with-ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">outspoken</a>. </p><p> </p><h2>Final note</h2><p>LinkedIn gives you what you give it. If you're just here to check a box, expect crickets. But if you use it as a space to connect, contribute, and learn, even in the comments, you’ll start to see it pay off.</p><p>Comments may seem small, but when used well, they are one of your most effective tools.</p><p> </p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;"><strong>6. LinkedIn's algorithm is basically a nightclub bouncer, deciding who gets in and who does not</strong></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span>There's a bigger system in place so LinkedIn can keep all our feeds as relevant as possible, so that we, the users, keep returning to their platform</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span>If you think LinkedIn is for just posting your content, you’re missing the point. In my daily work, I see many people getting anxious over details and specs while they don’t even know the basics of how and why the platform works. </span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span><strong>→ Before your content is seen at all, you need to get into the LinkedIn feed first.</strong></span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><h3 style="margin-left:0px;"><span><strong>Rule 1: The algorithm is the nightclub bouncer</strong></span></h3><ol><li><span><strong>You don’t look the part.</strong> If your post isn’t formatted well, the visual is off, or the text is hard to read, the algorithm notices. Looks matter. </span><br /> </li><li><span><strong>You don’t bring the right energy.</strong> Flat, generic, mediocre content signals low engagement potential. The algorithm wants posts that spark conversation, not just take up space. Engagement matters. </span><br /> </li><li><span><strong>You’re not on the list.</strong> Rarely post or engage? The algorithm doesn’t see you as a regular. Just like the bouncer turning away someone who shows up once a year, it won’t prioritize you. Consistency matters. </span></li></ol><p> </p><h3 style="margin-left:0px;"><span><strong>Rule 2: AI scans your post before any human sees it</strong></span></h3><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>The bouncer from the example above, that's AI. So, before your post even reaches someone’s feed, AI has already judged it. </span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>This scan is fast and ruthless. Only if your content passes all these checks will you have a chance to be featured in the feed. If you fail, no one even knows your post existed.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><h3 style="margin-left:0px;"><span><strong>Rule 3: Your activity gets you VIP treatment</strong></span></h3><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Being social on LinkedIn matters. <strong>The algorithm rewards effort</strong>. Engaging with others, sharing insights, starting conversations, and showing up in the comments pays off. That’s why comments are ranked higher than likes. Comments show you’re part of the conversation, not just tapping a button and moving on.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/linkedins-algorithm-is-basically-a-nightclub-bouncer-deciding-who-gets-in-and-who-not/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>→ Read the full post</span></a><span> </span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;"><span><strong>7. The 5 LinkedIn tips no one tells you</strong></span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span><strong>LinkedIn is quietly reinventing itself, and it looks like it's borrowing TikTok's algorithmic playbook.</strong> It’s shifting from a social graph to an interest graph, and that one change rewrites the rules of reach, visibility, and what actually gets seen.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>To keep this overview page a bit manageable → the full article </span><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-5-linkedin-tips-no-one-tells-you/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>‘The 5 LinkedIn tips no one tells you’</span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>What you’ll read: </span></p><ul><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><span><strong>In 2025, the big shift, from a social graph to an interest graph</strong></span></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><span><strong>Tip 1: Long-form is back. Depth and niche expertise are in. Video? Not so much</strong></span></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><span><strong>Tip 2. Write as you speak, don't try to impress</strong></span></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><span><strong>Tip 3: Stop asking fake questions. No one’s falling for it anymore</strong></span></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><span><strong>Tip 4. Obsess on the hook</strong></span></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><span><strong>Tip 5. Comment and engage</strong></span></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><span><strong>Company pages: still technically alive, basically useless. Here’s what to do</strong></span></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><span><strong>How often should you post</strong></span></li></ul><p> </p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2>8. LinkedIn’s new algorithm, what changed?</h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>This marks a major shift in how the LinkedIn timeline works. </span>It now doesn’t just scan your post, it reads it. Context, tone, and relevance now matter more than hashtags.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Instead of relying on thousands of separate algorithms—one for jobs, one for the feed, one for ads, LinkedIn now runs on a single large-scale language model with 150 billion parameters. It's similar to the technology behind ChatGPT or Gemini.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Here are the 3 biggest changes you need to know. </span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><h3 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>From ‘clicks’ to ‘meaning’</span></h3><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>In the past, LinkedIn focused on signals like likes and hashtags. 360Brew now actually reads and understands your text. It grasps the context and professionalism of your post. It’s all about content quality and relevance to your audience.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><h3 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>The profile-content anchor</span></h3><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>360Brew doesn’t look at a post in isolation; it evaluates how well it matches your profile. It uses your headline and ‘About’ section as the foundation for your expertise score.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>If your post aligns with your stated area of expertise, you get a boost. If not, the model may suppress it.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><h3 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>AI detection</span></h3><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>In the 360Brew era, the value system has shifted, as mentioned about the importance of comments and saves. But the model is extremely effective at detecting lazy, fully AI-generated content, and often downgrades its reach.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;"><span>9. LinkedIn is in 2026 one of the most cited sources in AI-generated answers</span></h2><p><span>AI is quietly building its knowledge base and LinkedIn Articles are one of its primary sources. Most brands haven't connected LinkedIn publishing to AI visibility yet.</span></p><p><span>For B2B queries, </span><a href="https://www.tryprofound.com/blog/linkedin-is-the-most-cited-domain-for-professional-queries-in-ai-search" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>Profound</span></a><span> tracked it as the #1 cited domain across six major AI platforms.</span></p><p><a href="https://www.semrush.com/blog/linkedin-ai-visibility-study/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>Semrush</span></a><span> analyzed 325,000 prompts across ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, and Perplexity. LinkedIn appeared in 11% of all AI responses, second only to Reddit, ahead of Wikipedia, YouTube, and every major publisher.</span></p><ul><li><span><strong>"LinkedIn is one of the most cited domains across AI models</strong>. </span><br /><span>It ranks #2 in citations in the Semrush dataset, appearing in 11% of AI responses on average across ChatGPT Search, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode.</span><br /> </li><li><span><strong>Your LinkedIn content can directly shape how AI explains your brand</strong>. </span><br /><span>LinkedIn shows relatively high semantic similarity scores in our dataset (0.57–0.60), meaning AI responses often mirror the meaning of the original content.</span><br /> </li><li><span><strong>Educational, original content is cited most often</strong>. </span><br /><span>Long-form articles (500–2,000 words) and mid-length posts (50–299 words) account for the largest share of AI citations, and 54–64% of cited posts focus on sharing knowledge or practical advice, while reshares are rarely referenced.</span><br /> </li><li><span><strong>AI citations reward relevance and consistency more than virality</strong>. </span><br /><span>Most cited posts have moderate engagement (15–25 reactions), while about 75% of cited authors post frequently (5+ posts in four weeks) and nearly half have over 2,000 followers.</span><br /> </li><li><span><strong>You need both Company Page content and individual thought leadership</strong>. </span><br /><span>For example, Perplexity cites Company Pages most often (59%), while ChatGPT Search and Google AI Mode more often cite individual creators (59%)."</span></li></ul><p> </p><h3>What this means for your brand</h3><p><span>The brands showing up in AI-generated answers aren't posting more. They're publishing better.</span></p><p><span>Structured articles. Clear expertise. Consistent topics. Written by people who actually know what they're talking about, not by a content team filling a quota.</span></p><p><span><strong>→ AI doesn't cite your brand. It cites your content, published by a coworker</strong></span></p><p><span>That shift, from thinking about LinkedIn as a social channel to treating it as a publishing platform, is the whole game right now. Most brands haven't made it yet.</span></p><p>Your next AI citation isn't a campaign. It's a LinkedIn article, written by someone at your company, published this week.</p><p> </p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2>10. The power of dark reach, the invisible spread of your content</h2><p>Dark reach on social refers to the unseen impact of your content: those interactions and impressions that <strong>don’t show up</strong> in the analytics but still matter. Just because you can’t measure it doesn’t mean it isn’t real.</p><h3><br /><strong>1. Invisible spread</strong></h3><p>Your content travels through private channels – chats, closed groups, email, DMs – where tracking dies.</p><ul><li>Shared by trusted peers, so higher impact</li><li>Links copied without UTM tags → ends up as ‘direct’ or mystery traffic</li><li>Reposts without credit → lives on in someone else’s feed, quietly</li></ul><p> </p><h3><strong>2. Invisible impact</strong></h3><p>Your content leaves a mark even when no one clicks, likes or comments.</p><ul><li>People might say ‘I see you post every week,’ though no metrics show that</li><li>On LinkedIn, a glance can create an impression, yet it may not be logged</li><li>Unopened emails where the sender + subject line alone build recognition and authority for you</li></ul><p> </p><h3><strong>Why this matters</strong></h3><p>Dark reach equals your content going ‘viral’ in the shadows. It’s the ghost impression that lives in someone’s mind, even if your dashboard shows crickets. Think of it like the friend who never comments but somehow knows your whole life story.</p><p> </p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2><span>11. </span>How to control what you see in your feed; your dwell time</h2><p><span>You can have a say in what content pops up in your feed. Besides engaging with content and creators, you can also do this by controlling your dwell time.</span></p><p><span>The more time you spend on a post, the more LinkedIn thinks you like it, even if you don't engage with the post. </span></p><p><span>Please note, this also goes for content that irritates you. So if you read something annoying and you get all fed up, and continue to read, LinkedIn thinks you appreciate it. The algorithm can’t read sentiment (yet).</span></p><p><span><strong>So, if you want to see less of that type of content, don’t engage with it. Don’t read it. Scroll on as fast as you can.</strong></span></p><p><span>Do spend time reading and engaging with content that you like. The more you do that, the more of that type of content you’ll get. And if you really like it, leave an in-depth comment and help the original poster gain more reach.</span></p><p><span>→ ‘</span><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/linkedin-algorithm-secrets-the-archive/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>How to comment, with 15x the impact of a like</span></a><span>’ (number 7 on the LinkedIn algorithm secrets list) </span></p><p> </p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;">12. Be aware of the ‘Pod policy’ for friends and co-workers</h2><p style="margin-left:0px;">Don’t ask your coworkers and friends to like and share your content blindly. LinkedIn has a ‘pod’ policy with penalties. This means you can’t fool the algorithm by asking for engagement just to increase reach. The algorithm recognizes this and lowers the value of the content.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">In other words:<span> </span><strong>LinkedIn punishes the ‘I like yours, you like mine’ behavior</strong><span><strong> </strong></span>(the pod policy).</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">I also know that for a major brand launching a new product, LinkedIn warned them in advance. The warning was about their plan to have thousands of employees post about the product on launch day. LinkedIn noticed, and the content was blocked by the algorithm. This brand is known for these kinds of tricks ;) I can’t mention names (NDA).</p><p> </p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2><strong>13. Reposting: ‘Instant’ is still the best, and reposts from employees have -30% impact</strong></h2><p>The latest buzz about LinkedIn posts is ‘not to repost' and always create a new post. I don't agree. The best reach for your post still depends on the content and not purely on how you post it. </p><p>That said, let's dive into some details and data. Below, you'll read why I like reposting and how to do it. </p><p>Including that, surprisingly,<strong> ‘instant reposts’ are better than ‘repost with thoughts.’</strong> </p><p>Another surprise is that <strong>when employees share company posts, the impact is reduced by about 30%. </strong>There is a ‘pod’ policy in place, t<span style="text-align:left;">his means that you can't trick the algorithm by asking your coworkers and friends to repost and comment. The algorithm knows and devalues this accordingly. </span></p><p> </p><p> </p><h2>Why I like reposting</h2><ul><li>It gives more credit to the original source than when you create a new post.</li><li>It shows your followers that you also share content from others besides your own.</li><li>The number of reposts reflects the quality and relevance of the content, or very smart and strong stakeholder management to convince others to repost.</li></ul><p> </p><p>2 Things to keep in mind:</p><p>→ If you want your <strong>C-suite to share your content</strong> on LinkedIn, you must make it as easy as possible for them. I don't see them creating a post from scratch, so reposting works better for them. </p><p>→ If the <strong>original post has a ‘link in comment</strong>,’ it will disappear, so you need to add the ‘link in comment’ to your repost. </p><p> </p><p> </p><h2>Repost: ‘instant’ or ‘with thoughts’?</h2><p>The copy below is ‘borrowed’ from the <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/richardvanderblom_algorithm-insights-2024-report-v10-activity-7160527422398844928-VnlE/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Algorithm Insights 2024</a> report, pages 72 and 73, rewritten and edited for clarity and relevance. Follow <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/richardvanderblom/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Richard van der Blom</a> for more insights, tips, and tricks based on data and research, not just opinions.</p><p>Before we start, a little definition. ‘Instant’ means hitting the ‘repost’ button without adding your thoughts. ‘Repost with thoughts’ means, well, adding your insights and why you think others should read this post. </p><p>→ Only <strong>add your thoughts when it makes sense</strong>, and to make it relevant for your followers. Does the original post need your thoughts, or can it do without? If in doubt, please keep in mind that the algorithm prefers the instant repost. </p><p>→ 2 Rules of thumb: first, make an effort; <strong>100+ words and personal</strong>. Two, <strong>don't repeat</strong> what's in the original post. For example, adding ‘we are looking for an account manager’ when reposting a job, that adds no value, isn't needed, is too short, and has nothing personal. </p><p> </p><p> </p><h3>What's in it for the original author, you wrote the post</h3><ol><li>‘Instant repost’ of your post within the first 4 hours can increase growth by 40%.<br /> </li><li>‘Repost with thoughts’: adding personal insights cuts the post’s impact by 12x compared to an ‘instant repost’. Oops! This is surprising to me. Based on Richard's research, it's better to encourage ‘instant reposts’ to maximize reach. <br /><br />I still believe it’s good to share your thoughts when reposting, as it shows you care and put in effort.<span> But you have to stick to the rules of relevance and length. However,</span> the data from January 2024 tells differently.  <br /> </li><li>You always need to engage quickly when others repost your content to favor the algorithm and amplify your reach. </li></ol><p> </p><h3>The reposter's perspective, you repost someone else's post</h3><ol><li>Engagement on ‘reposts with thoughts’ also needs to be fast. Without direct engagement, the visibility of your repost is limited to 8-10% of your typical reach. <br /><br />If you get 10+ engagements, you can boost that reach to 15-20%. But, based on the low reach of ‘reposting with thoughts’, you'll need to message your network to engage. <br /> </li><li>Add context: your ‘thoughts’ should be at least 100 words and or very personal. If not and shorter, your ‘repost with thoughts’ underperforms by 3x. <br /> </li><li>Employee versus external repost: when employees share company posts, the impact is reduced by about 30% compared to shares by individuals outside the company, except for infographics, which keep 25%.<br /> </li><li>Instant reposts are primarily a gesture to support the visibility of others' content. It boosts the original post’s reach by 4% but doesn’t increase your visibility. <br /> </li></ol><p> </p><p> </p><h2>My advice on ‘repost instantly’ or ‘add your thoughts’</h2><p>Honestly, I don't have a firm answer as to what to do. As with everything in life, it depends.</p><p>Whether you add your 100+ word thoughts depends on what you want to accomplish by reposting, your relationship to the original poster, and, of course, the content as in the message and post format. </p><p>Think about the pros and cons of reposting and adding thoughts, so you can decide for yourself what works best for your situation and your followers. </p><p>→ <strong>Don't ask your coworkers and friends, there is a ‘pod’ policy and penalty.</strong> <span style="text-align:left;">This means that you can't trick the algorithm by asking them, the algorithm knows and devalues this accordingly. </span></p><p>In the brand new <a href="https://richardvanderblom.gumroad.com/l/update-algorithm-insights-oct-2024" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">30-page update</a> of <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/richardvanderblom_algorithm-insights-2024-report-v10-activity-7160527422398844928-VnlE/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Algorithm Insights 2024</a> there are signs of a slight change towards the ‘add your thoughts,' but, based on the current data, the ‘instant’ is still favored (for now). </p><p> </p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2>14. <strong>How to set up employee advocacy and employee-generated content</strong></h2><p>These two pages give you all the information you need to know:</p><ul><li><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/amplify-your-business-page-reach-on-linkedin-with-employee-advocacy/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amplify your business page reach on LinkedIn with employee advocacy</a><br />The 5 tips to turn your employees into a LinkedIn machine<br /> </li><li><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/employee-generated-content-is-about-to-explode-what-youre-waiting-for/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Employee-generated content is about to explode; what are you waiting for?</a><br />A new, real, and authentic way to get reach for your brand</li></ul><p> </p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><strong>15. ‘Open to work’ as a red flag 🚩</strong></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">I wasn't aware, were you? For sure, I'll never put this up again. Small side note: this mainly applies to the more senior roles. </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">What to do instead? Get noticed with a<span> </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/richardvanderblom_unpopular-opinion-alert-for-job-seekers-activity-7242084199539625984-r6qx/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">solid personal content strategy</a>. </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="border-width:0px;width:500px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/78355209-fadb-4195-b81c-b37657b2d3e1/1920_linkedinopentoworkasredflag.png?x=1725017343063" alt="LinkedIn open to work as red flag" width="500" /></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:center;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:center;"> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2>16. Tips to create your best personal profile on LinkedIn</h2><p>As always, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/richardvanderblom_carousel-profile-checklist-april-2024-activity-7189876637562208256-7cTq?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Richard van der Blom</a> has your back. He created a simple 33-point checklist for improving your LinkedIn profile. </p><p>My take on his checklist is that these are the 4 easiest fixes that most often go wrong</p><ul><li><strong>Header visual</strong>: F'it with the boring corporate visual and big logo; keep it personal and authentic. There are many templates available to help you get started creating something awesome</li><li><strong>Profile picture</strong>: let it be professional, yet not too corporate stiff upper lip. And set it open; don't keep it a secret unless you're a celebrity special snowflake</li><li>Spend time writing an <strong>amazing headline</strong>. Check out Richard's post or scroll down. Make an effort, and don't stick to just your job title; that's boring, and nobody gets excited by that.</li><li><strong>Be active</strong>. If your last post, comment, like, or share is more than a few weeks ago, it signals you don't give AF about being social. Nobody likes not-social people</li></ul><p> </p><p>On average, the LinkedIn profiles Richard analyzed ranked 62%. This is your chance to do better and stand out</p><p>Check out his complete <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/richardvanderblom_carousel-profile-checklist-april-2024-activity-7189876637562208256-7cTq?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">checklist</a> to improve and complete your profile, and give him a follow for more great LinkedIn content and secrets. He knows.</p><p> </p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:500px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/621d535a-48d2-4d29-bd98-2ad61af7baa9/1920_clearsansthin.png?x=1714534390564" alt="SantaClaus on LinkedIn" width="500" /></p><p style="text-align:center;"> </p><h3><span>Your LinkedIn headline is your personal ad</span></h3><p><span>Your profile headline is your own personal ad in 120 characters; make them count and treat it like a mission statement - who you are and why people should connect with you. </span></p><p><span>There is no golden formula, yet these are </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/business/talent/blog/product-tips/recruiters-with-eye-catching-linkedin-profile-headlines" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>LinkedIn's own great examples</span></a><span> to be inspired by. </span></p><p><span>My key takeaways</span></p><ul><li><span>Write it like a <strong>super short elevator pitch</strong> without buzz or jargon</span></li><li><span>Share something <strong>personal</strong> in a light-hearted way,</span></li><li><span>Strengthen your headline with your <strong>profile picture and cover photo</strong>; it’s the combination of the 3 that makes you stand out</span></li><li><span>It’s not about you; <strong>focus on what you can do for the other</strong>, for example, as a rhetorical question as your headline</span></li><li><span>You can be <strong>bold</strong> and show confidence</span></li></ul><p> </p><h3>There's magic in your LinkedIn profile summary</h3><p><span>LinkedIn gets it. Writing your LinkedIn Profile summary isn’t at the top of your to-do list. Sometimes, you need great examples to see the summary’s magic and figure out how to write your own.</span></p><p><span>These are </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/business/talent/blog/product-tips/linkedin-profile-summaries-that-we-love-and-how-to-boost-your-own%20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>LinkedIn's 14 best practices</span></a><span>. </span></p><p><span>My key takeaways</span></p><ul><li><span>Very <strong>personal and authentically</strong> written in ‘I,’ they write as they speak</span></li><li><span>Around <strong>3 to 5 short paragraphs</strong>, quite some extended information with a minimum of around ~200 words</span></li><li><span>Visually appealing; use <strong>break lines</strong>, making smart use of whitespaces</span></li><li><span>Giving an <strong>overview with bullets</strong> or numbers where needed</span></li></ul><p> </p><p><span>Here are a few more tips</span></p><ul><li><span>Describe <strong>what makes you tick</strong> (in your own words)</span></li><li><span>Explain your present role and <strong>describe what you do in the simplest terms</strong>. Share what problems you solve and for whom</span></li><li><span><strong>Highlight your successes</strong>, cite the biggest takeaway from your experience section across roles</span></li><li><span><strong>Reveal your character</strong>, show your personality next to who you are professionally</span></li><li><span><strong>Ask for what you want</strong> your audience to do after reading your summary; be specific</span></li><li><span><strong>Make your first sentence count</strong>; hook them</span></li><li><span>Include <strong>keywords</strong> that highlight your top skills; these are the same keywords used in job descriptions</span></li><li><span><strong>Cut the jargon</strong>, as already mentioned; write as you speak</span></li></ul><p> </p><p>Below is <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/business/talent/blog/talent-acquisition/what-santa-can-teach-us-about-linkedin-profiles" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Santa Claus</a>'s LinkedIn summary. Be inspired.  </p><p> </p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:500px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/25ff5627-8918-491e-b0d4-5886d04e7bfd/1920_clearsansthin.png?x=1714534522699" alt="SantaClause LinkedIn bio" width="500" /></p><p style="text-align:center;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><strong>'About</strong></p><p style="margin-left:0px;">I'm the happiest guy you'll ever meet. My cheer is infectious, and I get thrills spreading it at scale. I love children too. I thrive on their faith in me. The combination of these two passions is why I’m in the business of making kids smile.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">My idea of fun is patiently listening to whiny customers seated on my lap in a mall, and turning their toy requests into $500 billion in sales. I’m proud that I have a direct impact on their behavior too: nice? Gifts. Naughty? Coal.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">I can wear many hats: postal worker, reindeer tamer, workshop executive, sleigh pilot, chimney gymnast and elf resources manager. Desk jobs aren’t for me though. I do my best work on the move, flying through the sky.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">I manage a team of 300,000 three-foot direct reports who live and breathe generosity and goodness. I know how to get the most out of them too. Since the launch of my elf-training program, my letter-readers have cut time-per-letter by 39% and my toy builders, wrappers and leaders have increased their output by 17%.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">I can brave arctic temperatures and overcome sleep deprivation. I can shimmy up and down chimneys in a flash – without making a peep. No chimney? No problem. I’ll figure out how to get in.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">I’m the kind of guy who is so meticulous that when I make my list in Excel, I check it twice. I have an uncanny ability to know when my customers are sleeping, and when they're awake.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">Despite the demands of the job, I’ve never missed my annual deadline. Ever. Some people don’t even believe in me, yet I still deliver to them on-time.</p><p>Once you nailed your LinkedIn profile, it's time to share content.'</p><p>Source: ‘<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/business/talent/blog/talent-acquisition/what-santa-can-teach-us-about-linkedin-profiles" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">What Santa Can Teach Us About LinkedIn Profiles</a>’</p><p> </p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2>17. Who to follow</h2><p>If you do want to know all the ins and outs of getting likes and comments, these gents know their game and share knowledge — no fuzz, no b*lls*t, no jargon, just honest, upfront advice and nailing it. </p><p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/richardvanderblom/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Richard van der Blom</a>,  <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/sam-browne/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sam Browne</a>, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/mattjbarker1/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Matt Barker</a>, and shout out to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/dickiebush/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dickie Bush</a>. </p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:500px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/c0ece6f7-5996-487c-bf2c-b286857b74bd/1920_liwhotofollow.png?x=1736272064823" alt="LI who to follow" width="500" /></p><p style="text-align:center;"> </p><h3>Sources</h3><p>Check out <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/richardvanderblom_editing-your-linkedin-post-activity-7052523590381883392-vfMk?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Richard</a>; he's got great insights on LinkedIn reach.  <br />LinkedIn cheat sheet below via <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alexandergreb_linkedin-bestpractices-content-activity-7028225767750651904-GC7_?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Alexander Greb</a> <br />Credits to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/aukevandergrinten_de-afgelopen-jaren-heb-ik-honderden-linkedin-activity-7021386588760743937-iAC6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Auke van der Grinten</a>, via the link how you can ask him to send you the Nextfields B2B LinkedIn handboek <br />And big thanks to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/sam-browne/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sam Browne </a>for his <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sam-browne_secrets-of-the-algorithm-v2-activity-7000898777217650688-Gt_3?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn secrets of the algorithm V2</a> <br />And follow <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/christcoolen/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Christ Coolen</a> for his insightful content on marketing psychology and content (Dutch only). </p><h3>Disclaimer</h3><p>This page is updated frequently. Whenever I get new insights worth sharing, I'll add them to this page. </p><p> </p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p>]]></content:encoded><category><![CDATA[social,LinkedIn,strategy,B2B]]></category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 20:29:00 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/5481f22b-b9c2-4f18-b112-28724e2e4cb9/500_linkedinalgorithmsecretsarchive.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/5481f22b-b9c2-4f18-b112-28724e2e4cb9/500_linkedinalgorithmsecretsarchive.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/5481f22b-b9c2-4f18-b112-28724e2e4cb9/linkedinalgorithmsecretsarchive.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[LinkedIn algorithm secrets archive]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>You probably don&#039;t need the AI-generated label</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/stop-worrying-about-the-mandatory-ai-generated-label/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/stop-worrying-about-the-mandatory-ai-generated-label/</guid><pp:caseid>777702</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>You do need the editorial process that earns you the exemption. Article 50 requires it. Your copyright does too.</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>Article 50 becomes applicable on 2 August 2026. The final guidelines were published on 20 July, with just two weeks' notice. </p><p>Now the market is confused, and searching.</p><p><strong>→ Marketers are mostly worried about the wrong thing. They're checking whether to slap a label on everything AI touched. They should be checking their editorial process instead.</strong></p><p> </p><p>     </p><h2>Marketing only own one of Article 50's four rules</h2><p>These are the 4 obligations when you need to notify that you’re using AI. </p><ol><li>If your <strong>AI talks to customers, it has to say so</strong>. Chatbots, AI agents, anything conversational on your site or in your DMs.<br /> </li><li>AI tools that generate audio, image, video, or text must embed a marker so the output is<strong> detectable as AI-generated</strong>. These machine-readable markers are the tools responsibility, and are invisible for you and me.<br /> </li><li><strong>If you're scanning faces or emotions, say so.</strong> This is niche. Most content and marketing work never touches this one.<br /> </li><li>You must inform your audience about <strong>deepfakes and t</strong><span><strong>ext publications on matters of public interest without human review or editorial control</strong></span><strong>.   </strong><br /><br /> </li></ol><p>     </p><p>The fourth rule is ‘deepfakes and text on matters of public interest must disclose that it's AI-generated’ is the one that matters to you. It's also the one that gets misunderstood the most. </p><p>And where your exemption lives. </p><p> </p><p>      </p><h2>‘Informing the public on a matter of public interest’ explained</h2><p>There are 3 gates. If one of these answers is ‘no’, you don’t need the AI-generated label. </p><p>    </p><ul><li><strong>Is it published?</strong> Is it public? Not a draft, not an internal doc, not a one-off email to a client.</li></ul><p>   </p><ul><li><strong>Is it informing, not selling?</strong> This gate decides most typical marketing cases with ‘no’. <br /><br />Ask yourself: Is this to promote or directly sell a product or service? Or would you call this journalism, or brand content to inform that happens to touch a serious subject?<br /><br /><strong>Most of your marketing copy, product descriptions, social posts, newsletters don’t fall under the Article 50's AI-labelling rule. </strong>Because this content is more sales focused and not a matter of public interest. </li></ul><p>   </p><ul><li>The most complicated one: <strong>Does the topic sit in a public-interest category? </strong>Politics, public health, justice, the environment, consumer safety, or an economic, scientific, or cultural development or trend people are debating.</li></ul><p> </p><p>      </p><p><strong>Explained by example</strong>: two pieces, same author (me), same site (mine), opposite outcomes. </p><ul><li>My LinkedIn post curating a podcast episode and a summer book pick.Published, yes.  Selling? No. Informing the public on a public-interest matter? No. It's brand voice. Out of scope.<br /> </li><li>A blog breaking down what these Article 50 guidelines mean for content teams, this piece in fact. Published, yes. Written to inform, not to sell. Sitting inside a named public-interest category. That one's in the gray zone. Probably in scope. <br /><br />But I have my editorial process in place, I can prove my human review, I’m the named author, so no AI-generated label needed. </li></ul><p>     </p><p><strong>→ Stop worrying about the AI-tag. Start worrying about the documented editorial process you don't have in place yet. </strong></p><p><strong>→ This safeguards your copyright too.</strong></p><p> </p><p>      </p><h2>How you qualify for the AI label exemption</h2><p>This is where most companies don't comply. Human review and editorial control means someone more than just fact-checking or correcting typos. You need someone with real knowledge of the subject examined the content. This person has the actual authority to approve, change, or kill the piece, and takes responsibility for it.</p><p><strong>→ Here's the process you need to qualify: </strong>one named person, with real subject knowledge, who can reject the piece and is on record as having reviewed it. Write that down as proof, if anyone ever asks.</p><p>If you don't have this documentation, you don't have a defensible position. Just a company hoping nobody asks.</p><p>There's a second reason to build this documentation. EU copyright law only protects work with genuine human creative input. The proof of your editorial review for Article 50 is the evidence that<strong> protects your copyright too.</strong></p><p> </p><p> </p><h2>Deepfakes: visual, video and audio content</h2><p>A deepfake, under Article 50, is AI content realistic enough to pass as something real that could exist — and convincing enough that someone might believe it. The rules are stricter. </p><p>All three of these need to be true before the watermark requirement applies:</p><ol><li>It closely resembles the real thing.</li><li>That real thing exists.</li><li>It could fool someone into thinking it's genuine.</li></ol><p> </p><p>Text gives you an out when the content is selling, not informing. Deepfakes don't get that out. With text, intent decides. With visual, video, or audio, it doesn't — the rule applies regardless of why you made it.</p><p>   </p><p><strong>Explained by example: </strong>a dragon and an AI host, same technology, opposite outcomes.</p><p>A dragon breathing fire in an ad, however photorealistic, isn't a deepfake. It fails criterion two; dragons don't exist and never have, so there's nothing real for the content to falsely pass off as. No disclosure needed, no matter how convincing the rendering.</p><p>An AI-generated host fronting your online masterclass is a different case entirely. It resembles a real person. That kind of person, someone teaching, on camera, speaking directly to an audience,  plausibly exists. And if you don't disclose it, your audience has every reason to believe they're learning from someone real. All three criteria met.</p><p>Same underlying technology. The difference is what the content claims to be, not how well it's made.</p><p> </p><p>    </p><h2>Why marketers panic anyway</h2><p>If the rule is this narrow, why is everyone still panicking?</p><p> </p><p><strong>The usual coverage flattens it.</strong> Most headlines read ‘AI Act requires labelling AI content.’ Full stop. Nobody mentions the four-obligation split, the three gates, or the editorial exemption.<br /> </p><p><strong>The fine number does the scaring.</strong> €15 million or 3% of turnover gets quoted next to ‘AI content’ with no qualifier attached. Nobody checks if it applies to them first.<br /> </p><p><strong>Legal talk adds to the confusion. </strong>Provider and deployer obligations get mashed into one. The invisible watermark is the tool's job. The visible disclosure is sometimes yours. Report both as ‘AI content must be marked,’ and marketers can't tell which part is theirs.<br /> </p><p><strong>Legal teams default to safe.</strong> ‘Label everything AI touched’ is the most secure solution. ‘You're probably exempt if you can prove editorial control’ takes work that's outside of their influence.<br /> </p><p><strong>And fear sells better than nuance.</strong> It pitches easier ‘you must label everything’ than ‘you're probably fine if your process holds up.’<br /> </p><p>    </p><p>→ None of this is irrational.</p><p>It just takes real work to understand the obligation, and right now the ownership of that work hangs in the middle, between legal, marketing, and whoever built the AI tool.</p><p> </p><p>      </p><h2>Wrappin it up; build the process, skip the AI label</h2><p>Most companies think they need an AI label. Don’t worry about the tag. Worry about the process you don't have in place yet. Not only for Article 50. For your copyright too. </p><p>Compliance was never going to be a sticker. It was always going to be a decision about who's allowed to say yes.</p><p>    </p><p>First. <strong>Know Article 50</strong>, the obligations, the gates and the exemptions. And separate your deepfake from your text content, as different rules apply.<br /> </p><p>Second. <strong>Run your written content through the three gates</strong>: published, informing not selling, sitting in a public-interest category. Flag anything that lands in the gray zone.<br /> </p><p>Third. <strong>Pick named persons as topic experts</strong>, with real subject knowledge, who have the authority to reject a piece before it publishes. Write down that this person reviewed it, and what they checked. Usually this is also the author of the piece.<br /> </p><p> </p><p>→ None of this is a label. It's a process. Build it once, and use it daily.</p><p> </p><p>      </p><h2>Disclaimer and sources</h2><p><span>This isn’t a legal advice — I'm a strategist, not a lawyer. This is my read of the regulation for marketing purposes. </span></p><p><span>  </span></p><ul><li><a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EUR-Lex, full official Regulation text</a></li><li><a href="https://ai-act-service-desk.ec.europa.eu/en/ai-act/article-50" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">European Commission's AI Act Service Desk, Article 50 text</a></li><li><a href="https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/guidelines-transparency-ai-generated-content" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">European Commission, final Guidelines</a></li><li><a href="https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/faqs/transparency-obligations-under-article-50-ai-act" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">European Commission FAQ on Article 50</a></li></ul><p>    </p><p>Secondary sources and legal commentary:</p><ul><li><a href="https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2026/european-commission-adopts-final-guidelines-on-ai-act-article-50-transparency-obligations-first-impr">https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2026/european-commission-adopts-final-guidelines-on-ai-act-article-50-transparency-obligations-first-impr</a></li><li><a href="https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/50/">https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/50/</a></li><li><a href="https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/transparency-rules-article-50/">https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/transparency-rules-article-50/</a></li><li><a href="https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/ip/2026-03/transparency-obligations-for-ai-generated-content-under-the-eu-ai-act-from-principle-to-practice">https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/ip/2026-03/transparency-obligations-for-ai-generated-content-under-the-eu-ai-act-from-principle-to-practice</a></li><li><a href="https://www.gtlaw.com/en/insights/2026/6/deepfakes-chatbots-ai-generated-text-european-commission-details-transparency-obligations-under-the-ai-act">https://www.gtlaw.com/en/insights/2026/6/deepfakes-chatbots-ai-generated-text-european-commission-details-transparency-obligations-under-the-ai-act</a></li><li><a href="https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=d06e3eb7-a067-423a-84cf-ace60f0dc647">https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=d06e3eb7-a067-423a-84cf-ace60f0dc647</a></li><li><a href="https://www.activemind.legal/guides/ai-transparency-marketing/">https://www.activemind.legal/guides/ai-transparency-marketing/</a></li><li><a href="https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2026/taking-the-eu-ai-act-to-practice-understanding-the-draft-transparency-code-of-practice">https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2026/taking-the-eu-ai-act-to-practice-understanding-the-draft-transparency-code-of-practice</a></li><li><a href="https://www.globalpolicywatch.com/2026/05/10-takeaways-european-commission-draft-guidelines-on-ai-transparency-under-the-eu-ai-act/">https://www.globalpolicywatch.com/2026/05/10-takeaways-european-commission-draft-guidelines-on-ai-transparency-under-the-eu-ai-act/</a></li><li><a href="https://wavect.io/blog/eu-ai-act-article-50-checklist/">https://wavect.io/blog/eu-ai-act-article-50-checklist/</a><br /> </li></ul><p> </p><p>      </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,750+ professionals</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who think before they create.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>→ </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">     </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p>]]></description><category><![CDATA[AI,strategy,legal]]></category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 21:14:00 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/b8270891-ca8e-466c-ab4d-a05eb4a0b404/500_euaiactexplained.png?11540" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/b8270891-ca8e-466c-ab4d-a05eb4a0b404/500_euaiactexplained.png?11540</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/b8270891-ca8e-466c-ab4d-a05eb4a0b404/euaiactexplained.png?11540</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[EU AI ACT explained]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>Analog rises because digital dominates</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/analog-rises-because-digital-dominates/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/analog-rises-because-digital-dominates/</guid><pp:caseid>762954</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>If you still think this is nostalgia, you&#039;re missing what&#039;s underneath it</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>Digital used to mean fast, easy, always on. Now it means something else too: fake, until proven real.</p><p>The rise of analog has been on trend reports since 2019. Vinyl, Leica, no makeup makeup, run clubs and offline clubnights. But it's not about nostalgia.<strong> It's about balance, and about flocking together.</strong> Two things AI can't fake.</p><p>Every dollar you put into more digital content buys you space in the most crowded, least trusted channel there is. Analog is your alternative.</p><p> </p><p> </p><h2>Three proof points, all with the same direction</h2><p>‘Handmade’, ‘creators’, and ‘offline’. All different stories with the same signal: a move toward something real.</p><ul><li><strong>Handmade</strong> proves someone spent the time</li><li><strong>Creators-over-influencers</strong> is about closeness and relatability</li><li><strong>Offline time and phone-free</strong> clubs are about attention and presence</li></ul><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>AI </span>accelerated what was already there</h2><p>Vinyl's growth streak started in the mid-2000s. Years before generative AI existed. Film cameras and print followed the same arc. Sales climbed before anyone had heard of ChatGPT. </p><p>AI didn’t create this, nor doest nostalgia explain this. A natural need for balance does.</p><p><strong>→ The more synthetic our environment, the stronger our pull toward what's real. From grain and weight, to imperfection and slowing down.</strong></p><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>Proof point 1: </span>handmade is a statement, not a style choice</h2><p><span>Two brands prove it.</span></p><ul><li><p><a href="https://youtu.be/1U5tubDlN00" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>Apple TV</span></a><span> </span>proves it through process. Its 2026 rebrand was shot in-camera, on physical glass, with an original score. No CGI.</p><p>The Cannes 2026 jury called it "gloriously human-made... a beautiful rebellion." They showed the craft on purpose. </p></li><li><a href="https://www.marketingbrew.com/stories/2026/03/30/aerie-doubles-down-on-its-no-ai-pledge-in-its-latest-campaign" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>Aerie</span></a><span> </span>proves it through policy. In October 2025, Aerie pledged never to use AI-generated bodies or people in its marketing. In March 2026, it went further: a campaign starring Pamela Anderson, built entirely around the line: ‘You can't prompt this.’ <br /><br />Q4 2025 sales were up 23% year over year. <span>This can’t be fully allocated to their no-AI statement, but it for sure helped.</span></li></ul><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>Proof point 2: creators take over from influencers</span></h2><p>Creators are worth more now. Not despite their smaller following. Because of it.</p><p>Influencers ask you to look up. <span>A level of celebrity, money, and distance most people will never reach.</span></p><p>Creators stand next to you. Same budget. Same problems. Same humor. You can't buy your way into their world. You have to earn it.</p><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>Proof point 3: being offline is the new luxury</span></h2><p><span>Feeds have no finish line, by design. That's the problem. This fatigue was already building before AI. Then AI made it worse.</span></p><p><span>Now you can't even tell what's real.</span></p><p><span><strong>Just like seeking balance, humans connecting with humans is wired into who we are.</strong></span></p><p><span> We felt it during the lockdowns. And it strengthened once things opened back up. From popular run clubs, coffee meetups, to phone-free clubnights.</span></p><p><span>Berghain in Berlin proved a phone-free floor works, over a decade ago. Nobody followed for years. In Ibiza, Solid Grooves has gone phone-free for its entire 2026 residency at DC-10. Pikes made it a nightly standard. Pacha is testing it too.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>Don't use AI to do more, do differently</span></h2><p>Here's the part most brands skip. AI frees up your time. Time that used to go into more digital content.</p><p>Spend it differently. Invest it in something real. ‘Handmade’, ‘creators’, and ‘offline’. All proof points with one claim: we trust what’s real. </p><p>For the board, stop asking how much more you can do online with AI. Start asking what you can do offline with the time AI freed up for you.</p><p> </p><p> </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,750+ professionals</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who think before they create.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span>→ </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p>]]></description><category><![CDATA[AI,trends,strategy]]></category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 20:18:31 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/4bd50ea1-b67c-4bd0-a86f-2bfbb0d13330/500_2027theriseofanalogandreal.png?24067" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/4bd50ea1-b67c-4bd0-a86f-2bfbb0d13330/500_2027theriseofanalogandreal.png?24067</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/4bd50ea1-b67c-4bd0-a86f-2bfbb0d13330/2027theriseofanalogandreal.png?24067</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[2027 the rise of analog and real]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>AI amplifies the junior roles</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/ai-amplifies-the-junior-roles/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/ai-amplifies-the-junior-roles/</guid><pp:caseid>765106</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>Everyone thinks AI killed it, but AI killed a team that never would have existed</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>Ramp tracked 21,559 US companies. Heavy AI spenders grew headcount 10.2% over two years. Entry-level roles grew 12%.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><strong>→ The finding is that serious investment produces growth with $33.67 spending per employee. And just an AI subscription produces nothing, with $2.78 per employee.</strong></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;"><strong>Stop counting the roles that got cut</strong></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;">A team of 3 does the work of a team of 10. That's the headline everyone's afraid of.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">Here's the part that gets missed. That team of 10 was never getting hired. Not this year, not with that budget, not for that scope. AI didn't cut 7 roles. It moved the ceiling on the 3 that were always going to exist.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;"><strong>Prerequisite 1: The investment has to be structural</strong></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;">Ramp's high-intensity adopters spend an average of $33.67 per employee, sustained over 3 months and beyond. Unlike a single basic chat subscription, they are running multiple models at once and using the more advanced, productivity-driving categories of AI tooling (coding agents, APIs). I'd bet they're also heavily investing in training.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">The dabblers spend $2.78 on a basic chat subscription and minimal training and see nothing move.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">Most juniors are winging it — nobody ever taught them the tool, let alone the ethics, the bias, or where the data goes.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><strong>→ A seat license is not a strategy.</strong></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;">   </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;"><strong>Prerequisite 2: The senior in the room is the multiplier</strong></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;">Here's what the data can't show you.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">I've watched this play out mulitple times with clients. The companies getting real value aren't replacing their juniors with AI. They're pairing them with a seasoned senior with real craftsmanship who knows what good looks like, correcting in real time, while the junior runs the AI.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">The juniors learn faster than any onboarding program could teach them. And your team’s output moves faster than any team without AI ever could.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">That trained junior is also the pipeline the company will need in a few years. Companies that understand this keep hiring them. Not despite the AI. Because of it.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><strong>→ AI without a senior sets you up to fail exactly like the seat license does.</strong></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;">    </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;"><strong>Most companies are missing both</strong></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;">This is where it quietly goes wrong.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">AI literacy and tooling spend without craftsmanship gets you fast, confident mediocrity at scale.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">Craftsmanship without the spend gets you a brilliant senior manually doing what could be multiplied by a team of juniors instead.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">→ Most companies are missing both while calling it an AI strategy.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;">   </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;"><strong>What to do</strong></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;">Ask yourself who's sitting next to your junior when they open AI. If the answer is nobody, you're not multiplying anything. You're just paying for speed with mediocrity at best.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;">Sources:</p><ul><li><p style="margin-left:0px;"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/betsytong/">Betsy Tong</a><span style="margin:0px;padding:0px;"> </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/betsytong_everyone-ai-means-fewer-people-needed-truth-activity-7482044847663591424-7L4e" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">original post</a></p></li><li><p style="margin-left:0px;"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/victorknaap/">Victor Knaap</a><span style="margin:0px;padding:0px;"> </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/victorknaap_very-interesting-post-by-betsy-tong-everyone-share-7482519701198311424-ix3p" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">repost</a>:<span style="margin:0px;padding:0px;"> </span></p></li><li><p style="margin-left:0px;">Ramp Economics Lab, “<a href="https://ramp.com/data/ai-jobs-impact" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">A New Look at AI's Impact on Jobs</a>”</p></li><li><p style="margin-left:0px;">Financial Times, “<a href="https://www.ft.com/content/8026eac6-16ad-467d-b8c3-c48c5af684e6?syn-25a6b1a6=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Heavy corporate AI spenders add staff faster than peers</a>”</p></li></ul><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:center;"><br /><span> <img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/e658beff-c93a-47dc-8715-e82e0275713e/800_1783971714588.jpg?x=1784693549597" alt="1783971714588" width="300" /></span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:center;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:center;"> </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span><strong>Join 2,750+ professionals</strong></span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who think before they create.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span>→ </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><p><br />  </p>]]></description><category><![CDATA[AI,strategy]]></category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:23:20 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/e739674d-57f9-4ce9-849d-21156ed7e366/500_aicreatesjuniorroles.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/e739674d-57f9-4ce9-849d-21156ed7e366/500_aicreatesjuniorroles.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/e739674d-57f9-4ce9-849d-21156ed7e366/aicreatesjuniorroles.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[AI creates junior roles]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>In 2027, your website&#039;s job is evidence with authority and a point of view</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/in-2027-your-websites-job-is-evidence-with-authority-and-a-point-of-view/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/in-2027-your-websites-job-is-evidence-with-authority-and-a-point-of-view/</guid><pp:caseid>763075</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>Most leadership teams haven&#039;t figured out what the site is for anymore</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p><span>Your website used to be where you closed the sale. Now it's where the LLM checks your authority.</span></p><p><span><strong>→ Most brands are still running the site like the digital brochure it was ten years ago: measuring visits, polishing the homepage, tuning the landing pages.</strong></span></p><p><span>That's the wrong layer. LLMs cite the detail pages — the ones with a specific point of view that shows authority. Get that right, and it works for the LLM and the human at once.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Nobody at board level owns this problem</span></h2><p><span>The web crossed a line. Bots now outnumber humans in web traffic.</span></p><p><span>The exchange rate is broken. The model consumes your site at scale and pays almost nothing back in visits. Anthropic's ClaudeBot reads thousands of your pages for every visitor it sends back. Google's ratio sits closer to five to one. (These numbers move monthly.)</span></p><p><span><strong>→ The only leverage left is whether you're worth citing.</strong></span></p><p><span>You likely can't see any of this happening. Most standard analytics run on a toolset built for a visitor that's becoming a minority. AI crawlers hit your server directly and don't show up in your dashboard.</span></p><p><span>The stakes are high. If an LLM doesn't see you as an authority, you don't rank low. You don't exist.</span></p><p><span><strong>→ And nobody owns this (yet).&nbsp;</strong></span></p><p><span>It's a new territory, dropped onto a leadership agenda that was already full. Nobody knows what to do with it yet, so nobody does anything.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>What you need is authority</span></h2><p><span>GEO isn't a separate discipline from good writing. It's SEO plus a readability layer; a clear point of view, solid claims, and a clear structure.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span><strong>→ What the LLM needs is also what a busy, distracted human needs too.</strong></span></p><p><span>The real difficulty it’s being an authority. Generic AI-generated content tends to be the average of everything already online. It gets found and ignored.</span></p><p><span>Authority and judgment are what set you apart and make you worth citing. Your point of view, your structure, your craft — these carry the proof of real thinking.</span></p><p><span><strong>Your website's job has shifted, from an emotional sales layer to a clear evidence layer: a verifiable record of thinking that earns the model's trust.</strong></span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Invest in what AI can’t generate</span></h2><p><span>Judgment and voice are what earn you the citation. That's where your investment has to go. Two things to do.&nbsp;</span></p><ul><li data-list-item-id="ee8047e4b57389e96f81c440c754709ae"><span>Measure the website like a source document, and check whether it's structured so an LLM can extract and attribute it correctly.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="ee1cda5b888dbacdebade0c620a109b63"><span>Contentwise, invest in your voice and create what AI can’t: proprietary data, IP, a named point of view, and your first-person judgment. This is what earns you the citation.</span></li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Own it</h2><p><span>If you nail the GEO, you’ll be like by busy humans as well. It’s not two audiences fighting for different content. Your page can do two jobs; proving itself to a LLM, and meaning something to a person.</span></p><p><span><strong>→ In 2027, your website's job is evidence with authority and a point of view. Not a sale. Build that, and the sale follows.</strong></span></p><p><span style="text-align:start;">Nobody owns this yet. It's a board decision nobody's made (yet).&nbsp;</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span style="text-align:start;">𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿: GEO and SEO are bigger than this. Most advice covers the mechanics. This piece covers what gets skipped: the thinking that has to happen first, and the senior craft it takes to do it.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,750+ professionals</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who think before they create.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;"><span>→&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p>]]></description><category><![CDATA[AI,strategy,GEO]]></category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 20:30:23 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/d8fe11cd-45b7-4276-8275-c4d2391014bb/500_aiandgeoownership.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/d8fe11cd-45b7-4276-8275-c4d2391014bb/500_aiandgeoownership.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/d8fe11cd-45b7-4276-8275-c4d2391014bb/aiandgeoownership.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[AI and GEO ownership]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>AI ignores what it creates</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/ai-ignores-what-it-creates/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/ai-ignores-what-it-creates/</guid><pp:caseid>762247</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>Without a voice, you&#039;re invisible to GEO and LLMs</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>Your voice gives you authority, and that’s what gets you cited by an LLM. Most brands don't have anyone senior enough to protect it, and that's a bigger problem than it looks.&nbsp;</p><p>B<span>rand is now the most important competitive asset in marketing.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your voice gives you authority, and is the first thing that disappears when you use AI to write your content. GEO isn't about publishing more content. It's about becoming an authoritative source worth citing.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span>Your authority can't come from AI working off a junior brief. It takes human craft at a senior level that understands the brand, and most don't have anyone in that role. Which means that there's a staffing gap right where it matters most: <strong>brand is the most important competitive asset in marketing</strong>.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Your content now has an AI audience</span></h2><p>According to the <a href="https://cpl.thalesgroup.com/about-us/newsroom/ai-driven-bot-attacks-surged-according-to-bad-bot-report">2026 Thales Bad Bot Report</a>, 53% of all global web traffic is now automated. Bots outnumber humans for the second year running.</p><p>Some of that traffic is AI crawlers, indexing your content so a model can retrieve it later. They don't decide anything the moment they visit. They decide what gets stored. And stored is what gets cited, whenever someone asks an LLM a question.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Authority comes from your voice</h2><p><span>AI-generated content is usually voiceless slop produced at scale. It has no authority, no original claim, and no point of view. It reflects what's already online—the average of existing content.</span> LLMs have no reason to retrieve or cite it.</p><p><span><strong>→ AI doesn't create authority. It retrieves it.</strong></span></p><p><span>You need a voice. Voice comes from craft. Craft earns human trust. Human trust builds authority. Authority gets you cited.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Your voice can't be delegated</h2><p><span>I'm not saying you shouldn't use AI. You absolutely should. But use AI to assist you, not to replace you. You bring the ideas, the perspective, and the voice. AI helps you write faster, organize your thinking, and refine the execution.</span></p><p><span>The thinking is yours. The writing is AI-assisted. Not the other way around. </span>Authority can’t be outsourced. <span><strong>Your voice is what makes you you.</strong> It's what gives you authority. </span>It's also the one thing AI can't generate<span>.&nbsp;</span></p><p><strong>→ The difference is simple: AI-generated scales content. AI-assisted scales voice and authority.</strong></p><p><span>Your voice is built on three things only someone with genuine expertise can create:</span></p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e2e8512152c9cfc7c681306700763c860">A distinct point of view, the perspective only you can hold</li><li data-list-item-id="ea68857898ebcf57d1fa04c4b8b5e2f48">Structure and storyline, the architecture of how ideas connect</li><li data-list-item-id="e3aac535dc6cfce233d392da9ad5aba56">Real copywriting and creative craft, the skill that makes people stop, read, and remember</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p>This is not a junior task. It's not brand guidelines. It's the thinking behind the content. That requires a senior strategist. And it's the most under-resourced role in marketing today.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Three questions for your leadership team</h2><p>Are you producing content that earns authority, or content that fills a calendar? Are you measuring citations and voice consistency, or reach and volume? Are you using AI to cut costs, or to scale craft?</p><p><strong>→ Your 2027 budget decision isn't about which AI tool to buy. It's how you protect the most important competitive asset in marketing: your voice. It’s how your brand is brought to life. And only a human can create that.</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Disclaimer</strong>: GEO and SEO are bigger than this. Most advice covers the mechanics. This piece covers what gets skipped: the thinking that has to happen first, and the senior craft it takes to do it.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,500+ professionals</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who think before they create.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;"><span>→&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><category><![CDATA[AI,strategy,GEO]]></category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 17:26:47 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/2ff63e63-62af-4092-92c0-4db5480493f5/500_geocitesauthoritycontent.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/2ff63e63-62af-4092-92c0-4db5480493f5/500_geocitesauthoritycontent.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/2ff63e63-62af-4092-92c0-4db5480493f5/geocitesauthoritycontent.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[GEO cites authority content]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>LinkedIn 2026: the job seeker&#039;s edition. Why deleting your old resumes is the first thing you should do</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/linkedin-2026-the-job-seekers-edition-why-deleting-your-old-resumes-is-the-first-thing-you-should-do/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/linkedin-2026-the-job-seekers-edition-why-deleting-your-old-resumes-is-the-first-thing-you-should-do/</guid><pp:caseid>784751</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>The LinkedIn algorithm secrets, July update</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>I deleted 7 old resumes from my account. More relevant recruiters showed up. Job suggestions improved. This month I'm also covering why your headline and your content need to match, and the hated Open to Work badge and post.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>This month’s LinkedIn algorithme secrets update is dedicated to the job seekers. And for anyone who wants LinkedIn to actually work for them.</span></p><p><strong>→ TLDR: I deleted 7 old resumes from my account. Relevant recruiters showed up. Job suggestions improved. </strong></p><p><strong>I also cover why your headline and your content need to match, and where I stand on the Open to Work badge.</strong></p><p> </p><p> </p><h2>1. Delete your old resumes from your LinkedIn profile</h2><p>If you've ever uploaded a resume, LinkedIn uses that. It uses all that data to read you and build a picture of you. Even the hidden resumes that no one but you can see.</p><p><strong>If your saved resumes are old or written for jobs you no longer want, you're sending mixed signals.</strong> Mixed signals means not showing up in the right recruiter searches.</p><p>Here's how to clean it up.</p><ul><li>Go to Settings & Privacy → Data Privacy → Job Seeking Preferences. <br /> </li><li>Look for two settings: ‘Save resumes and application data’ and ‘Share resume data with recruiters.’<br /> </li><li>Turn them off first, then delete every resume that doesn't match anymore. All of it.<br /> </li><li>Then upload your current resume, the one that reflects the role you want. If you're targeting two different tracks, upload one for each.<br /> </li><li>Before you switch those settings back on, check that your profile and your resume align. Same dates. Same job titles. Same keywords. LinkedIn uses both to build its picture of you. If they contradict each other, that picture gets blurry.<br /> </li><li>Toggle the settings back on. Done.</li></ul><p> </p><p>→ I deleted 7 old resumes from my account.</p><p><span>All credit for this goes to </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/emilyworden_last-week-i-told-you-that-your-resume-settings-share-7467938615134834689-1_Id/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span>Emily Worden</span></a><span>. Follow her for </span>great practical content for job seekers<span>.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>2. Your job suggestions will improve too</span></h2><p>I did this cleanup and the difference was immediate. The vacancies LinkedIn suggested actually match what I'm looking for now.</p><p>The junior roles disappeared. Just like that. <strong>My old resumes were so outdated and off-target they were pulling my entire profile down.</strong> LinkedIn had built a picture of me I no longer recognised.</p><p>I should have done this years ago. It would have saved me a lot of frustration.</p><p> </p><p> </p><h2>3. Your headline shouldn't be your job title</h2><p>Recruiters don't browse profiles. They search with keywords. If those keywords don't appear in your headline, bio, or work experience, you won't show up.</p><p><strong>Write the headline for the role you want, not a description of the job you have now. </strong>Then carry those same keywords through your bio and experience. That's how you get found before you apply.</p><p>Need inspiration? <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/business/talent/blog/talent-acquisition/what-santa-can-teach-us-about-linkedin-profiles">Santa's LinkedIn profile</a> is genuinely worth a look.</p><p> </p><p style="text-align:center;"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/business/talent/blog/talent-acquisition/what-santa-can-teach-us-about-linkedin-profiles" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><img class="image_resized" style="width:500px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/621d535a-48d2-4d29-bd98-2ad61af7baa9/1920_clearsansthin.png?x=1782548275140" alt="SantaClaus on LinkedIn" width="500" /></a></p><p> </p><p> </p><h2>4. Your headline and your content need to match</h2><p>This one matters beyond job seeking. It applies to anyone who posts.</p><p><strong>LinkedIn evaluates your profile and compares it against the topics you post about. </strong>The stronger the alignment, the more LinkedIn sees you as a credible voice. It pushes your profile to the right recruiters and amplifies the reach of your posts.</p><p>Here's a fast way to check.</p><ul><li>Go to your profile, click Edit, delete your headline, and hit ‘Write with AI.’ <br /> </li><li>Look at what it suggests. That's LinkedIn's read of you. <br /> </li><li>Now compare it to what you actually post about. Same territory? You're fine. Completely different? That's your reach problem.</li></ul><p> </p><p>One thing: <strong>don't use that suggestion as your actual headline. It's terrible</strong>. LinkedIn’s AI is a diagnostic, not a copywriter, no matter what LinkedIn says. Use it to see how LinkedIn reads you, then write your own.</p><p>‘Write with AI’ is a LinkedIn Premium feature. Free one-month trials come up regularly. Worth doing this check before the trial expires.</p><p>All credit for this goes to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alicia-teltz_ex-linkedin-employee-sharing-underrated-linkedin-share-7474732719248265216-PKvV/">Alicia Teltz</a>, follow her for more.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>5. How to write your open to work post</span></h2><p>The best practical guide I've seen on this is <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-announce-youre-opentowork-linkedin-theres-better-way-worden--nshee/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Emily Worden's</a> framework. I edited it for my own use. When I posted <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:share:7308452177222467584/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">my open to work post</a> in March 2025, it landed me 2 new projects.</p><p>LinkedIn will nudge you to write a post when you activate your Open to Work settings. It will even draft one for you. Don't use it. ‘Hi everyone, I am looking for a new role and would appreciate your support’ tells nobody anything. It's lazy and won't get you results.</p><p><strong>Write your own. Short paragraphs, short sentences, bullet points and line breaks.</strong></p><p>Here's how.</p><ul><li><strong>Start with a story</strong>. Not ‘I am looking for a new role.’ Something real: ‘After being laid off in December and taking time to regroup with my family, I'm ready to work.’<br /> </li><li><strong>Say what you're looking for</strong>. Job title, industry, the skills you want to use. Be specific. Vague gets ignored.<br /> </li><li><strong>List your best results</strong>. Numbers, not descriptions. Impact, not just responsibilities.<br /> </li><li>Optional: <strong>add a human or fun fact</strong>. LinkedIn has gone more social. People connect faster when they know something real about you.<br /> </li><li><strong>Close with a specific ask</strong>. ‘If you know anyone hiring product managers, send them my way. Like or comment to help with visibility.’ People want to help. Make it easy.<br /> </li><li><strong>Offer to return the favour</strong>. One line is enough.</li></ul><p> </p><p>→ Repost every three to four weeks. Most people didn't see it the first time.</p><p> </p><p style="text-align:center;"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:share:7308452177222467584/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/57e436e6-2c9e-4eda-a4d0-5e0eb40b93e8/800_opentowork.png?x=1782549012550" alt="open to work" width="300" /></a></p><p> </p><p> </p><h2><span>6. The Open to Work badge: signal or red flag?</span></h2><p><span>The debate is back. Should you use it or not.</span></p><p><span>My view is simple. <strong>For junior or mid-level professionals, use it</strong>. It's a clear signal and recruiters respond to it.</span></p><p><span><strong>For senior leaders and C-suite, don't.</strong> It doesn't read as availability. It reads as desperation. There's a difference, and the people you want to attract know it.</span></p><p><span>I've never had a recruiter not reach out because I didn't have the badge. It has never stopped them. Not once.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2>More insights on LinkedIn's algorithm secrets </h2><p>I collected all my monthly updates on the<a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/linkedin-algorithm-secrets-the-archive/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> All LinkedIn algorithm secrets</a> archive page. </p><p>What you'll learn:</p><ol style="text-align:left;"><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>How the algorithm builds its profile of you, which influences your reach</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Your connections stopped being your distribution</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Specificity beats authenticity</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Nurturing: the work after you publish</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>The 9 rules for commenting effectively</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/linkedins-algorithm-is-basically-a-nightclub-bouncer-deciding-who-gets-in-and-who-not/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>LinkedIn's algorithm is basically a nightclub bouncer, deciding who gets in and who not</strong></a></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-5-linkedin-tips-no-one-tells-you/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>The 5 LinkedIn tips no one tells you</strong></a></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>LinkedIn’s new 2026 algorithm, what changed?</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>LinkedIn is in 2026 of the most cited sources in AI-generated answers</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>The power of dark reach, the invisible spread of your content</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>How to control what you see in your feed; your dwell time</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Be aware of the ‘Pod policy’ for friends and co-workers</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Reposting, ‘instant’ is still the best, and reposts from employees have -30% impact</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>How to set up employee advocacy and employee-generated content</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>‘Open to work’ as a red flag</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Your profile matters and makes a huge difference</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold"><strong>Sources and who to follow</strong></li></ol><p> </p><p><strong>Special edition: </strong><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/how-to-make-your-resume-ats-proof-with-ai-3-things-that-matter/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>How to make your resume ATS-proof with AI and LinkedIn</strong></a></p><p>And please, before jumping to any conclusions, check the original sources for all insights, nuances, and details. As with everything, these secrets have context.</p><p> </p><hr /><p> </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,750+ professionals</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference. </span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span>→ </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><hr /><p> </p>]]></content:encoded><category><![CDATA[social,LinkedIn,strategy,B2B]]></category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 19:52:00 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/41159061-871e-492c-8f87-9486bff13049/500_linkedinjobseekerssecrets.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/41159061-871e-492c-8f87-9486bff13049/500_linkedinjobseekerssecrets.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/41159061-871e-492c-8f87-9486bff13049/linkedinjobseekerssecrets.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[LinkedIn job seekers secrets]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>The difference between agents and agentic, clearly explained</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-difference-between-agents-and-agentic-clearly-explained/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-difference-between-agents-and-agentic-clearly-explained/</guid><pp:caseid>758636</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>It all starts with a prompt and ends with a system that runs itself</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>Agent. Agentic. Everyone uses both words. Almost nobody means the same thing when they do. They're related. They're not interchangeable.&nbsp;</p><p>Two letters between agent and agentic. And three skills from prompt to agent to agentic.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agent. Agentic. Everyone uses both words. Almost nobody means the same thing when they do. They're related. They're not interchangeable.</p><p><strong>→ Two letters between agent and agentic. And three skills standing between you and a system that runs itself.</strong></p><p>Nobody explained it clearly. Until now.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Prompting → one input, one output, every time</h2><p>You write the prompt. AI responds.&nbsp;</p><p>Nothing runs without you. And you start from scratch every time, new question, new prompt.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>→ Realize that your bad prompt doesn't stay bad. It travels. Into your agent. Into your agentic system.</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Agent → build it once, let others use it</h2><p>You invest time upfront. Write the prompt once, configure that in the agent, and it's ready.&nbsp;</p><p>You can share agents with your team. They don't need to know how the agent works. They just give it input. The agent does the thinking, based on the prompt you’ve built into its settings.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>→ Someone still presses ‘go’.</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Agentic → runs by itself</h2><p>The agent is the basis of agentic. The only difference is what starts it. For agentic, that's a scripted trigger based on ‘if this, then that’.</p><p><strong>→ Build once and it completely runs by itself. That's agentic.</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The agentic logic can chain multiple actions.&nbsp;</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e18b38d20b6a3e13e621ab24e051fefc2">If it's Monday 7am (the trigger),</li><li data-list-item-id="e86cfc4a96e92a245807ff194b8990138">then the agent pulls last week's most relevant updates on marketing and AI from trusted sources, gives it context and meaning, sends it from my gmail, and lands them in your inbox.</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="edb4a72dca89ea360a7bedf0f4bb94571">If a new email arrives from a potential client (trigger),</li><li data-list-item-id="e08a77143f8214925ab890d9c3438ad87">then the agent creates a project folder, drafts a reply outline, and drops a bespoke pitch deck in the folder. Ready before you've opened your inbox.</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Agentic requires new skills and responsibility. To decide what condition triggers it. And to build the logic that runs without supervision; safe, reliable, and auditable.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:500/auto;width:500px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/246c2c59-0dec-407c-ad46-3c3afac0b0b9/1920_agenticworkflowwithagents.png?x=1782067115581" alt="agentic workflow with agents" width="500" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:500/auto;width:500px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/b1e208c8-9280-44d5-95dd-767c0ad7de21/1920_agentoragentic.png?x=1782355574020" width="500" alt="agent or agentic" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><h2>Skipping steps and skills breaks it</h2><p>Prompt to agent to agentic is a clean model with sequential skills. You need to master the first, before you can move to the second.&nbsp;</p><p>In practice, organisations skip steps. The tools make it too easy. But automating something you don't fully understand makes it harder to trust the output, audit the process, fix what breaks or even update it.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>→ The order from prompt to agent to agentic exists for a reason.</strong></p><p>Read more about the <a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/ai-explained-for-human-beings-from-prompt-engineering-to-agents-to-agentic/" target="_blank">7 levels of AI</a>.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:800/auto;width:800px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/8885843a-c753-4a6f-a7e5-4099c85747bb/7_levels_ai_savviness.png?x=1782069291471" alt="7_levels_ai_savviness" width="800" height="auto"></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>More skills, more return</h2><p>Each level is a different discipline with progressive skills. Prompting is about talking to a machine. That's communication. Building an agent is about configuring a system. That's design. Agentic is about logic, triggers, dependencies. That's architecture.</p><p>Each level asks more. Each level returns more. The order is not optional.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span><strong>Join 2,500+ professionals</strong></span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;"><span>→&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><category><![CDATA[AI,strategy]]></category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 08:07:21 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/f04947de-bebd-4332-a6a0-20839a089926/500_agentandagenticexplained.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/f04947de-bebd-4332-a6a0-20839a089926/500_agentandagenticexplained.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/f04947de-bebd-4332-a6a0-20839a089926/agentandagenticexplained.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[Agent and agentic explained]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>How to make your resume ATS-proof</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/how-to-make-your-resume-ats-proof-with-ai-3-things-that-matter/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/how-to-make-your-resume-ats-proof-with-ai-3-things-that-matter/</guid><pp:caseid>679090</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>Knowing how ATS works and gatekeeps, gets you at least one step closer to a human recruiter</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p><span>Around 75% of companies use ATS to scan and auto-reject resumes, meaning if yours isn’t formatted properly, it might never get seen by a human. </span>How to use AI and LinkedIn to ATS-proof your resume and some prompts to improve your communications.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Around 75% of companies use ATS to scan and auto-reject resumes, meaning if yours isn’t formatted properly, it might never get seen by a human.</span></p><ol><li class="ck-list-marker-bold" data-list-item-id="ef41f0c153c3325ec17e42211d30c8301"><strong>Requirements for ATS-proof resumes</strong></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold" data-list-item-id="e8dac4bdf83971ae1af4a3c4d4407bb45"><span><strong>Use AI and LinkedIn</strong></span></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold" data-list-item-id="e74748e95bc54ce799075fdf7d3b6ff29"><span><strong>Prompts for your cover letter and highlighting skills&nbsp;</strong></span></li></ol><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">Before we start, in 3 bullets what you need to know about ATS systems.&nbsp;</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e1769b313b9289caf22b33014e1c0f6eb"><span>ATS stands for Applicant Tracking System, like Workday or Homerun.</span></li><li data-list-item-id="e7f9b4d24986235ecda28bb903cfa11fe"><span>Around 75% of companies use ATS to scan resumes, and that might filter and auto-reject yours before it gets seen by a human recruiter.</span></li><li data-list-item-id="e5e8059fa314116ba8a536576d0e53cbb"><span>Recruiters react accordingly to the </span><a href=" https://www.linkedin.com/business/talent/blog/talent-acquisition/hiring-trends-you-need-to-know-2025?src=e-nl&trk=all-daily-blog-newsletter" target="_blank"><span>overflow of AI-optimized and tailored resumes</span></a><span> with fast and scalable assessments </span>that balance candidate experience with accuracy.</li></ul><h3 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</h3><p><span>Some systems are running on older legacy systems, so your resume has to be idot-proof for them to be able to read it.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><strong>Your ATS-proof resume should look boring</strong></h2><p>The first is a screenshot of my 1-pager, a beautifully designed resume in PDF. The second is ATS proof, boring, very clean, and a few pages, but if that is what gets me over the ATS wall, I'll settle with it.&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><strong>→ The more plain and boring, the more the ATS likes it</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:500/auto;width:500px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/c8c21b18-e6c8-406c-9695-97ca08533a34/1920_originalresume.png?x=1733113177986" alt="original resume" width="500" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:500/auto;width:500px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/b8fde664-2876-4ecb-8537-87527cea8899/1920_atsproofresume.png?x=1733079862556" alt="ATS proof resume" width="500" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span><strong>1. Requirements for ATS-proof resumes</strong></span></h2><p><span>This is what matters if you want the ATS software to scan your resume easily and get seen by a human recruiter.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><h3><span>Simplify your formatting</span></h3><p><span>Beautifully designes resumes with complex layouts, graphics, or unconventional fonts confuse ATS. What to do instead:</span></p><ul><li data-list-item-id="eed2823a145ccab798caf51e91114351a"><span><strong>Use default fonts</strong> and the standard layout for headers and sub-headers. Minimize your styling like bolding, italics, and underlining.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e8a086690341393971cc841b9b7c769bd"><span><strong>Stick to standard section headings</strong> like ‘Work Experience,’ ‘Education,’ and ‘Skills’ to make sure the ATS can correctly identify each part of your resume.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e78c9fe5dc438e15953289f25b1cdd7df"><span><strong>Avoid infographics</strong>, images, charts, or tables, as ATS has difficulty reading these.</span></li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">The more plain and boring, the better. <span>There are resume templates provided by Canva or Word. The ones with the nice two-column layout, I don’t know if it’s smart to use them. It looks nice, but…</span></p><ul><li data-list-item-id="eabadc7650c3cfd456a781976cb6a860d"><span>From your user perspective, it’s a hassle to create and adjust the document.</span></li><li data-list-item-id="e1afd0bd6766778ef7547653855c5451d"><span>From a hiring manager’s perspective, the cognitive load is high, it makes me search for relevant information in the document.</span></li><li data-list-item-id="ea9e8687470258dce73724592218f37aa"><span>From an ATS perspective, is the hierarchy clear and simple enough to scan and evaluate accordingly?</span></li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span>If my objective is to get past the ATS automation, I stick to a super simple, boring-looking text only PDF document. &nbsp;And honestly, this breaks my strategic, creative, and content heart, but it is what it is.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><h3><span>Optimize your keywords</span></h3><p><span>Here’s the automation magic. The ATS software scans your resume based on the keywords in the job description to rank your application. It is a bit like SEO: the better the match, the higher the ranking.</span></p><ul><li data-list-item-id="ee993f093372c585649a7d8ba1ac816f7"><span><strong>Match keywords</strong>: when you use the right skills, job titles, and qualifications in your resume, you tell the ATS, ‘Hey, I’m exactly what you’re looking for!’</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="ef01eab434853bcf6277f1e484e3d60ec"><span><strong>Be accurate, no keywords stuffing</strong>: don’t just plug in keywords for the sake of matching.&nbsp;</span></li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><h3><span>Use compatible filenaming</span></h3><p><span>The naming of the file should be clear and straightforward: FirstName_LastName_Resume.pdf. No need to include a date or a version number, keep it as simple as possible.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span><strong>2. Use AI and LinkedIn to ATS-proof your resume</strong></span></h2><p><span>This is what you need to do:</span></p><ol><li data-list-item-id="e0b6a68528f84b4cbbc8e7eb706bc140b"><span><strong>Download your LinkedIn profile</strong> as a PDF; go to your profile, click on the ‘resources’ button in your bio, and ‘save to PDF’.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e2803e280fd63d182ef1baaba3b4e909b"><span><strong>Copy the job description</strong>.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e20b50fe3855aa18fdbfc107aa47138e3"><span><strong>Go to AI</strong> and use a prompt similar to this: </span><i><span>Imagine you want to apply for [job title]. Can you help me adjust my resume and make it ATS proof? Please use the job description below and my resume uploaded as a PDF. Job description: “ [paste the copied job description here] ”</span></i><span> and upload your LinkedIn profile PDF in the same prompt.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="eae03f025149cd080583b3997b24246d8"><span><strong>Check the response</strong>; seriously, AI can hallucinate and adjust your work experience freely. Make sure there are no lies and that what is written is accurate. Adjust if needed.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e102ad348114e61e7504ff2b2fc619d98"><span><strong>Shift to Word</strong>: once you’re happy, copy the response and paste it into Word. You can also ask AI to create a .doc or PDF, but I noticed that sometimes that download is missing paragraphs.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e67b25b3b2a4f731184cec9e4367ffa51"><span><strong>Adjust</strong> further by adding or deleting paragraphs. This manual edit makes it more authentic.&nbsp;</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="ea17333f50aa4baf14b7993daecef9cfa"><span><strong>Save as PDF</strong>: review and refine a bit more in Word and export as PDF.</span></li></ol><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span>Let’s be clear: ATS-proofing your resume is no guarantee of getting an invite; your experience and the human match still define success.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>3. <span><strong>Prompts for your cover letter and highlighting skills&nbsp;</strong></span></h2><p>Stolen with pride, these prompts help you with finetuning your resume and communications. Please check the <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/heyronir_95-of-resumes-get-rejected-within-seconds-activity-7280976683711569920-zQUI?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop" target="_blank">original post</a> for all the prompts.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span style="text-align:start;"><strong>Resume summary section</strong></span><br>’<i><span style="text-align:start;">Create a compelling summary section for my resume that encapsulates my professional experience, key skills, and achievements, tailored to a [job position] role at [company] in the [industry] sector, while reflecting the [company culture/value].’</span></i></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span style="text-align:start;"><strong>Cover letter</strong></span><br>’<i><span style="text-align:start;">Integrate key points from my resume into a cover letter paragraph that highlights my unique qualifications for the [job position] at [company], emphasizing my [specific skill/experience] that aligns with [company's mission/vision].’</span></i></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span style="text-align:start;"><strong>Technical skills section (or other skills)</strong></span><br>’<i><span style="text-align:start;">Detail the technical skills, software proficiencies, and certifications that make me a strong candidate for the [job position] at [company]. Tailor the list to focus on tools and technologies emphasized in [industry/role-specific needs].’</span></i></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span style="text-align:start;"><strong>Soft skills demonstration</strong></span><br>’<i><span style="text-align:start;">Craft impactful examples of how my soft skills, such as [communication, leadership, or teamwork], have driven positive outcomes, tailored for enhancing the soft skills section of my resume for a [job position] at [company].’</span></i></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span style="text-align:start;"><strong>Feedback and revision suggestions</strong></span><br>’<i><span style="text-align:start;">Provide actionable feedback for revising my current resume to better align with a [job position] at [company]. Focus on improving [layout, language, and relevance to the role] while ensuring clarity and professionalism.’</span></i></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>How can I check if my resume is ATS-proof?</span></h2><p><span>Simple, use a tool like </span><a href="https://v" target="_blank"><span>Jobscan</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://resumeworded.com/ " target="_blank"><span>Resume Worded</span></a><span>, or </span><a href="https://zety.com/" target="_blank"><span>Zety</span></a><span>.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Now it’s all up to you.&nbsp;</p><p>Good luck!</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Disclaimer: original publication date November 2024, updated in June 2026.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span><strong>Join 2,500+ professionals</strong></span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;"><span>→&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><category><![CDATA[AI,interview]]></category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 08:50:29 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/252335e6-6624-4b64-a6eb-b192813131f8/500_atsproofyourresumewithai.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/252335e6-6624-4b64-a6eb-b192813131f8/500_atsproofyourresumewithai.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/252335e6-6624-4b64-a6eb-b192813131f8/atsproofyourresumewithai.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[ATS proof your resume with AI]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>The 66+ books every marketer should read, including June’s top pick</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/books/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/books/</guid><pp:caseid>376694</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>Fuel your mind: read and learn (preferably in that order)</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>These are the books I keep recommending — and gifting to people who don't know they need it. Yet.&nbsp;</p><p>No ranking, the first is just as good as the last.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are the books I keep recommending — and gifting to people who don't know they need it. Yet.</p><p>No ranking, the first is just as good as the last.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>June’s book of the month: 'Barking Up the Wrong Tree: The Surprising Science Behind Why Everything You Know About Success Is (Mostly) Wrong' by Eric Barker</h2><p>Everything others tell you about success? Some of it is wrong. Most of it is incomplete. All of it is worth questioning.</p><p>Eric Barker backs that up with research. How schools reward conformity, not potential. And that context is everything for qualities that make people wildly successful or sometimes destroy them.</p><p>Each chapter flips a conventional belief on its head. Then gives you the science to back it up.</p><p>The most important decision you can make is figuring out what the right game is for you. Read it before someone else defines your line of success for you.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/d979e9ea-3c28-4b2c-b415-d0af85dd3783/800_barkingupthewrongtreeericbarker.jpg?x=1781065217621" alt="Barking up the wrong tree Eric Barker" width="300" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>Marketing and Strategy books</h2><p>1.&nbsp;‘Alchemy’ by Rory Sutherland<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[June 2025 book of the month]<br>2. ‘No Bullsh*t Strategy’ by Alex M H Smith&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[February 2024 book of the month]<br>3. 'Chaz's 100 Things a Planner Should Know' by Charles Wigley<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[October 2025 book of the month]<br>4. ‘Building a StoryBrand’ by Donald Miller <br>5. ‘Obvious Adams’ by Robert R. Updegraff<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[January 2026 book of the month]<br>6. 'Insanely Simple' by Ken Segal<br>7. ‘Unreasonable Hospitality’ by Will Guidara <br>8. ‘They Ask, You Answer’ by Marcus Sheridan <br>9. 'Influence' by Robert B. Cialdini&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[November 2024 book of the month]<br>10. 'How Big Things Get Done' by Bent Flyvbjerg, Dan Gardner<br>11. 'Reinventing the store', ‘Het geheim van bol.com’ by Michael Schaeffer &nbsp;<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[December 2023 book of the month]<br>12.&nbsp;‘How not to Plan: 66 ways to screw it up’ by Les Binet and Sarah Carter <br>13. ‘Leaders eat last’ by Simon Sinek<br>14. 'Measure What Matters' by John Doerr<br>15. 'Start with Why’ by Simon Sinek<br>16. ‘Let my people go surfing’ by Yvon Chouinard<br>17. 'Good Strategy, bad strategy' by Richard P. Rumelt<br>18. 'Epic Content Marketing' by Joe Pulizzi<br>19. 'The Infinite Game' by Simon Sinek<br>20. 'Leading the Starbucks Way,' by Joseph A. Michelli<br>21. ‘Eat your Greens’ by Wiemer Snijders<br>22. ‘Nudge' by Richard H. Thaler, Cass R. Sunstein<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [May 2024 book of the month]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Content and copywriting books</h2><p>23.&nbsp;‘Very Good Copy’ by Eddie Shleyner<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[August 2024 book of the month]<br>24. ‘A Self-Help Guide for Copywriters’ by Dan Nelken <br>25. <span>‘Writing for Busy Readers’ by&nbsp;Todd Rogers&nbsp;and&nbsp;Jessica Lasky-Fink</span><br>26. ‘Simply said’ by Jay Sullivan<br>27. 'Creativity. A Short and Cheerful Guide' by&nbsp;John Cleese<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[July 2024, October 2025 book of the month]<br>28. ‘The Copywriter's Handbook’ by Robert W. Bly <br>29. ‘Copywriting Secrets’ by Alan Sharpe<br>30. 'TED Talks Storytelling' by Akash Karia<br>31. 'Everybody writes' by Ann Handley<br>32. 'Advertising for skeptics' by Bob Hoffman<br>33. 'Make Your Idea Matter: Stand out with a better story' by Bernadette Jiwa</p><h2><br>Mindset and Psychology books</h2><p>34. 'How to Win Friends and Influence People' by Dale Carnegie<br>35. ‘Barking Up the Wrong Tree’ by Eric Barker<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[June 2026 book of the month]<br>36. ‘Pitlane Lessons’ by Marc Priestley<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[May 2026 book of the month]<br>37.&nbsp;‘Learning to Learn’ by Barbara Oakley<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[October 2024 book of the month]<br>38. ‘Thinking Clearly’ by Rolf Dobelli<br>39. ‘The Let Them Theory’ by Mell Robins<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[February and March 2025 book of the month]<br>40.&nbsp;'Think Faster, Talk Smarter' by&nbsp;Matt Abrahams<br>41. 'The Power of Vulnerability' by Brene Brown<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; [September 2024 book of the month]<br>42. ‘Comfort Crisis’ by&nbsp;Michael Easter&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[August 2024 book of the month]<br>43. ‘Slow Productivity’ by Cal Newport&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[April 2024 book of the month]<br>44. 'The Art of Gathering' by&nbsp;Priya Parker<br>45. ‘Invisible Women. Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men’ by Caroline Criado-Perez<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; [June 2024 book of the month]<br>46. ‘Body language’ by Vanessa Van Edwards in Dairy of a CEO<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [January 2025 podcast of the month]<br>47. 'Get Your Sh*t Together’ by Sarah Knight<br>48. “The ONE Thing” by Gary Kelly and Jay Papasan<br>49. 'Thrive' by Arianna Huffington<br>50. 'If I Could Tell You Just One Thing' by Richard Reed<br>51. 'Daily Reflections for Highly Effective People' by Stephen R. Covey <br>52. ‘Don't Sweat the Small Stuff' by Richard Carlson <br>53. 'The Ideal Team Player' by Patrick M. Lencioni<br>54. 'Atomic Habits' by James Clear <br>55. 'Mindset' by Carol S. Dweck<br>56. 'Living with a SEAL:' by Jesse Itzler<br>57. 'The 5 Second Rule' by Mel Robbins<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [March 2026 book of the month]<br>58. ‘Unmasked’ by Ellie Middleton</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>(Auto)biographies</h2><p>59. ‘Careless People’ by Sarah Wynn-Williams<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [July 2025 book of the month]<br>60. ‘Be Useful’ by Arnold Schwarzenegger&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [January 2024, November 2025 book of the month]<br>61. ‘Kitchen Confidential’ by Anthony Bourdain <br>62. ‘Before & Laughter’ by Jimmy Carr<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[August 2025 book of the month]<br>63. ‘Screw it, Let’s Do It' by Richard Branson<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[December 2024 book of the month]<br>64. ‘The Art of Resilience’ by Ross Edgley <br>65. ‘The story of Lululemon' by Chip Wilson <br>66. 'Can't Hurt Me:' by David Goggins  </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>1. ‘Alchemy. The Dark Art and Curious Science of Creating Magic in Brands, Business, and Life’ by Rory Sutherland&nbsp;</h2><p>Initially, I was skeptical about this book. But, man, it didn't disappoint, and I've already listened to it. Twice.&nbsp;</p><p>A combination of Kahneman's ‘Thinking Fast and Slow’ and ‘Creativity’ by Cleese. ‘Alchemy’ is about logic and reason, written and read by a Brit, including the accent.&nbsp;</p><p>This should be on every marketer's reading list. It's about <span>how embracing irrationality can lead to innovative solutions,</span> <span>emphasizing understanding human psychology over pure logic to influence behavior and create impactful ideas.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/4ec37617-b4bc-41f0-a74c-7fa594c206d1/800_alchemyrorysutherland.jpg?x=1744308147391" alt="Alchemy Rory Sutherland" width="300" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>2. ‘No Bullsh*t Strategy’ by Alex M H Smith&nbsp;</h2><p>Mandatory reading for every marketer and (self-proclaimed) strategist. <span>In "No Bullsh*t Strategy," Alex M H Smith gives you a simple but powerful line to define strategy: <strong>'You are the only X that does Y.'</strong></span></p><p><span>This is the unique value your business brings to the market with the strategic philosophy ‘<strong>Only is better than best</strong>.’</span></p><p><span style="text-align:left;">A well-written strategy brings razor-sharp focus by making decisions on what to do and, above all, what not to do.</span></p><p><span style="text-align:left;">If Alex doesn't ignite your mind in the first chapter, this is not a book for you, and you'll never get it.&nbsp;</span></p><p>For the lazy ones, here's a 🎙️ <a href="https://open.spotify.com/episode/1tp7v0w6AoHHhwtaTraGiN?si=a884b8e179854be1" target="_blank">great podcast hosting Alex</a> and his ‘No BS Strategy.’</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/d3fc1ab1-35c6-4cfb-80b6-7350eaeafc03/800_550x550.jpg?x=1738997998589" alt="no bullshit strategy Alex MH Smith" width="300" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>3. 'Chaz's 100 Things a Planner Should Know' by Charles Wigley</h2><p>This sweet, short little book is the kick in the but you sometimes need to get unstuck and gain new inspiration. It's written for planners on the agency side, but equally, if not more, important to marketers at the client side.&nbsp;</p><p>His book costs about as much as your over-foamed oat milk macchiato. But it lasts longer.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/d123607d-2457-48e8-9a4e-78c0164e5e49/800_chazs100thingsaplannershouldknowbycharleswigley.png?x=1760246259098" alt="Chazs 100 Things a Planner Should know by Charles Wigley" width="300" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>4. ‘Building a StoryBrand’ by Donald Miller</h2><p>One of the best books on content and storytelling I have read in recent years. Learn how to build your story with your customer in mind.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>→ It's not about you; it's about how your brand solves your customers' problem(s).&nbsp;</strong></p><p>Once you know this trick, you will recognize it in every great Hollywood movie. Your message will change for the better.&nbsp;</p><p><i>“The first campaign he released went from nine pages in the New York Times to just two words on billboards all over America: Think Different. When Apple began filtering their communication to make it simple and relevant, they actually stopped featuring computers in most of their advertising. Instead, they understood their customers were all living, breathing heroes, and they tapped into their stories.&nbsp;</i></p><p><i>They did this by (1) identifying what their customers wanted (to be seen and heard), (2) defining their customers’ challenge (that people didn’t recognize their hidden genius), and (3) offering their customers a tool they could use to express themselves (computers and smartphones). Each of these realizations are pillars in ancient storytelling and critical for connecting with customers.”</i></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_schermafbeelding2020-11-22om16.58.24.png?x=1608534884666" alt="" width="673" height="300"></p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_img-9436.jpeg?x=1608534918448" alt="" width="300" height="400"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>5. ‘<span>Obvious Adams. The Story of a Successful Businessman’ by Robert R. Updegraff</span></h2><p>Written in 1916. Still sharper than most marketing today. This short, powerful book should be mandatory reading for anyone in marketing or communications. It will completely rewire how you think.</p><p>A quick 40-minute listen on Audible, you'll never regret.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/6b902639-84fe-4cd9-aca5-3106bbf639a8/800_obviousadams.jpg?x=1765169342190" alt="Obvious Adams" width="300" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>6. 'Insanely Simple. The Obsession that drives Apple's Success'&nbsp;by Ken Segal</h2><p>Keeping things simple and keep your focus, are two of the most underestimated success factors in business. We want everything for everybody. Almost out of a fear of missing out on customers or business. By making it over-complicated -- you achieve the opposite. Great in combination with 'Good Strategy, Bad Strategy' by Richard P. Rumelt.&nbsp;</p><p>This is my&nbsp;go-to book for most of my clients. With my humble advice 'Better whole-ass one thing that half-ass everything'.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/800_insanelysimple-kensegal.jpg?x=1737783308877" alt="InsanelySimple-kensegal" width="300" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>7. ‘Unreasonable Hospitality’ by Will Guidara</h2><p><span style="text-align:start;">A gem of a book. ‘It’s about how you make people feel' and challenging the status quo to do better. It not only applies to the hospitality industry. Also very relevant for brands, marketers, agencies, and employers. A very nice read or listen, with great insights.</span></p><p>Such as the 95-5 rule. 95% frugal and splurge insanely on the 5% in the details that matter, and create an unforgettable experience.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/800_unreasonablehospitality.jpg?x=1671539428488" alt="unreasonable hospitality"></p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>8. 'They Ask You Answer: A Revolutionary Approach to Inbound Sales, Content Marketing, and Today's Digital Consumer' by&nbsp;Marcus Sheridan&nbsp;</h2><p>This book is mandatory reading for everyone working in marketing and or content. The ‘They Ask, You Answer’ is the way to create content to align with your (potential) customer's needs.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>SEO and AI search ranking</strong><br>A great way to rank high in SEO and attract organic traffic. It’s also AI search-friendly because it prioritizes your customer. I take it further by writing FAQs based on customer prompts, resulting in ChatGPT and Perplexity frequently appearing in my web traffic analytics.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/9874b088-bfc7-4df9-9236-e377e4116748/800_schermshyafbeelding2023-03-19om11.33.30.png?x=1737783446986" alt="they ask you answer" width="300" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><strong>9. </strong>'Influence, New and Expanded. The Psychology of Persuasion' by Robert B. Cialdini&nbsp;</h2><p>This is an updated classic. Three reasons why you should read it</p><p>First, it explains how Booking.com realized +700% conversion by introducing social proof and scarcity in their booking process with ‘XX other people booked this accommodation today’ and ‘only 2 rooms left’.&nbsp;</p><p>Second, the reason why waiters give you a sweet when they hand the check is not because it's a custom; it's because of the small gift they get up to 21% more tips.&nbsp;</p><p>Third, in this update, Cialdini adds the new ‘unity’ principle.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Cialdini's Principles of Persuasion:</strong></p><ul><li data-list-item-id="eeb1d107bdf1eb2bda2b98616300bf3bf">Reciprocation</li><li data-list-item-id="e71f110983c9d1adeaf7d2eeb3824ebe3">Commitment and Consistency</li><li data-list-item-id="e0e3c9246be46c963259c63183f2200fe">Social Proof</li><li data-list-item-id="e6baf07b13cbbe4f689ef0fe0774edbb1">Liking</li><li data-list-item-id="e09b2e554f6ebf8dbe1e2103608373116">Authority</li><li data-list-item-id="ed5e1ae436fce63a88734d7b60bab844c">Scarcity</li><li data-list-item-id="e855cefbe635a87ba39c88b56f4874dbc">Unity, the newest principle for this edition</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/0c8cd3a3-0d88-41f9-9c79-1f3fe6dd64c7/800_influencebycialdini.jpg?x=1730636485103" alt="Influence by Cialdini" width="300" height="auto"></p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>10. 'How Big Things Get Done: The Surprising Factors That Determine the Fate of Every Project, from Home Renovations to Space Exploration and Everything In Between' by Bent Flyvbjerg, Dan Gardner</h2><p>What I love the most about this book is the 'think slow, act fast' principle. Always take your time to think, plan, create space in your project planning for iterations to learn and improve and if needed, create mockups to test and refine. However tempting it is, never start immediately in the action modus; that is a guarantee for failure.</p><p>The second thing I love is the 'start with the end in mind' principle. This is the same principle that Amazon applies: write the press release before you create a project plan. What's in it for the end-user? How can they benefit from your product or service? Only when you have that crystal clear, you work your way backward to the beginning, the project plan.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/a2e58de1-a077-4414-bec6-32e12fdec39a/800_howbigthingsgetdone.jpg?x=1719641431955" alt="how big things get done" width="300" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p><h2>11. 'Reinventing the store', ‘Het geheim van bol.com’ by Michael Schaeffer&nbsp;</h2><p>This book is a little gem. Breaking the rules, challenging the status quo, David versus Goliath. A look behind the scenes at how bol.com succeeded and challenged Amazon. How to nail e-commerce, get inventory, and test with concepts, products, and categories. Fail fast, learn faster. All are based on data. And with real customer-centricity.&nbsp;</p><p>Even though the book can also be seen as one brilliant big commercial for bol.com, I'm still inspired.&nbsp;</p><p>UK version ‘<a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Reinventing-store-bol-coms-shopping-revolution/dp/9047015126" target="_blank">Reinventing the store</a>’&nbsp;</p><p>Dutch ‘<a href="https://www.bol.com/nl/nl/p/het-geheim-van-bol-com/9300000005311227/" target="_blank">Het geheim van bol.com</a>’, also available as an audiobook on Podimo. My <a href="https://podimo.com/nl/mgm3/mgm30daysnl_521b17d4-729c-4bb9-9ee1-79301d04caf8" target="_blank">affiliate link</a> (you get a free month and 10h audiobooks, and I get a free month)</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:200px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/7175fe03-81bd-4a26-983e-f8997d55ce6c/500_bol.jpg?x=1702888816462" alt="bol" width="200"></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>12. ‘How not to Plan: 66 ways to screw it up’ by Les Binet and Sarah Carter</h2><p>f*ckin' brilliant... No brainer. Just read. “Digital data is often daily of hourly, making it easier to measure short-term marketing effect. But much hard to measure long-term effects. They get lost in the noise.” “Get it right, and you can move from Big Data to Big Insights, Big brands, and Big Profits” (in the chapter 'How not to see the wood for the trees'.)</p><p>Mandatory for everyone who works in advertising, marketing and or communications: client and agency. The reviews speak for themselves.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_how-not-to-plan.jpg?x=1582209440130" alt="" width="300" height="424"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>13. ‘Leaders eat last’ by Simon Sinek</h2><p>What I took away from this book and my reasons why you should read this.&nbsp;</p><p>Honestly, the book was not what I expected it to be. It's not a book on ‘how-to’ leadership, it's different; pleasantly surprised by the socioeconomic background and explanations of why we need leadership.&nbsp;</p><ol><li data-list-item-id="ee75ac22da903649d834b657c3a8232aa">Explanation of how we got where we are as a society. From the roaring ‘20 to the depression, to WOII, to baby-boom, to materialistic egocentric 80 into the now. Simon explains the social circumstances, technology, and innovations that caused our current egocentric, materialistic society; and how we got from a human-focused to a money-focused world, including the first mass layoffs in the 70s. Read part 4 ’How we got there'</li><li data-list-item-id="e425e221a228baa019ad09da196632177">Why we have a maximum span of 150 friends or people around us. If it are more, you need a middle layer in the hierarchy at the office. &nbsp;Or you need to ditch some friends ;)</li><li data-list-item-id="efd75f7322b2714edbc599de6745fa12b">It's about balance. Nature and we humans, we always strive for balance. The more extreme the event, the more equally extreme the counter-reaction to create a new balance.&nbsp;</li></ol><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/2fbf5528-b894-4656-93ff-0db924cdc7d7/800_leaderseatlastsimonsinek.jpg?x=1696219313416" alt="Leaders eat last Simon Sinek"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>14. 'Measure What Matters: How Google, Bono, and the Gates Foundation Rock the World with OKRs' by John Doerr</h2><p>Mind-blowing easy to keep track of why and what you do. Measure what matters. Love this, from KPI to OKR: 'the Objective is simply what is to be achieved', Key Results' benchmark and monitor how we get to the objective. Effective KRs are specific and time-bound, aggressive yet realistic. Most of all, they are measurable and verifiable.'</p><p>A tangible example by Intel. Objective: 'Demonstrate the 8080’s superior performance as compared to the Motorola 6800.' Key Results: 1. Deliver five benchmarks. 2. Develop a demo. 3. Develop sales training materials for the field force. 4. Call on three customers to prove the material works.' (p27)</p><p><a href="https://www.whatmatters.com/" target="_blank">https://www.whatmatters.com/</a>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_schermafbeelding-2019-09-16-om-10.54.45-1024x427.png?x=1582210630871" alt="" width="300" height="125"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>15. 'Start with Why’ by Simon Sinek</h2><p>This is a classic. ‘No brainer, just read it. Even better than his TED talk. “Is a customer who buys your product for a second time a loyal customer or just plain lazy?” and more of this ‘food for thought’. Simon Sinek is straight to the point and inspiring.</p><p>“Some in management positions operate as if they are in a tree of monkeys. The make sure that everyone at the top of the tree looking down sees only smiles. But all too often, those at the bottom looking up see only asses.” (page 113)</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_why-simonsinek.jpg?x=1582209221746" alt="" width="300" height="451"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>16. ‘Let my people go surfing’ by Yvon Chouinard</h2><p>How to apply your purpose to your brand, explained by&nbsp;Patagonia and do some storytelling along the way. Amazing example in the book&nbsp;‘Let my people go surfing’ by Yvon Chouinard.</p><p>N=1, first part, grab a bottle of wine and just read it, the second part gets really interesting how their (initial) mission statement “Build the best product, cause no unnecessary harm, use business to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis.” is applied to all aspects of their business: from marketing to HR and finance.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_go-surfing.jpg?x=1582209825418" alt="" width="300" height="300"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>17. 'Good Strategy, Bad Strategy' by Richard P. Rumelt</h2><p>Good&nbsp;strategy&nbsp;is creating focus and making choices.</p><p>"A good strategy does more than urge us forward toward a goal or vision. A good strategy honestly acknowledges the challenges being faced and provides an approach to overcoming them."</p><p>"The core of strategy work is always the same: discovering the critical factors in a situation and designing a way of coordinating and focusing actions to deal with those factors."</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_goodstrategybadstrategy.jpg?x=1582210339222" alt="" width="300" height="456"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>18. 'Epic Content Marketing' by Joe Pulizzi</h2><p>One of the best&nbsp;books&nbsp;on&nbsp;content, 7 years old and still relevant in this fast-paced industry.</p><p>'You do not lead by hitting people over the head - that's assault, not&nbsp;leadership' quote by Dwight D. Eisenhower (p3)</p><p>'Remember, customers don't care about you; they care about themselves and their problems. We often forget that point when we describe how wonderful our widget is (that no one cares about).' (p75)</p><p>The ***** reviews on Amazon speak for themselves.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_img-5084-1024x768.jpg?x=1582210461762" alt="" width="300" height="225"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>19. 'The Infinite Game' by Simon Sinek</h2><p>"Do you know the game you are playing?" An&nbsp;infinite&nbsp;game with a&nbsp;finite&nbsp;mindset is to set up for failure.</p><p>"The motivation to play in an infinite game is completely different—the goal is not to win, but to keep playing. It is to advance something bigger than ourselves or our organizations. (p. 32)"</p><p>"Where a finite-minded player makes products they think they can sell to people, the infinite-minded player makes products that people want to buy.&nbsp;(p. 10)"</p><p>Any leader who wants to adopt an infinite mindset must follow five essential practices: Advance a Just Cause, Build Trusting Teams, Study your Worthy Rivals, Prepare for Existential Flexibility, Demonstrate the Courage to Lead (pp. 24-25)</p><p><a href="https://simonsinek.com/the-infinite-game" target="_blank">https://simonsinek.com/the-infinite-game</a></p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_schermafbeelding-2019-11-04-om-06.15.18-648x1024.png?x=1582210658130" alt="" width="300" height="476"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>20. 'Leading the Starbucks Way, 5 Principles for Connecting with Your Customers, Your Products, and Your People' by Joseph A. Michelli</h2><p>Be inspired by how Starbucks grew its business. Amongst others, involving the people on the work floor in the decision-making that impacts their daily work. Light and easy to read.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/800_starbucks.png?x=1674148562014" alt="starbucks"></p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>21. ‘Eat your Greens’ by Wiemer Snijders</h2><p>'Razor-sharp overview of the marketing myths, misconceptions, dubious metrics and tactics that bear little relation to our actual buying behavior'.</p><p>Again... absolutely love this book: crap-cutting nonsense eliminating inspiration, no-brainers, and opening doors at the same excellent level as the 'How not to plan' by Les Binet.</p><p>Cherry-pick the chapters that are relevant to you and your job, industry, or profession. To be honest and speaking for me, myself and I: not every page of this book was equally interesting ... and I skipped a few of them due to the subject or the way the chapter was written.</p><p>"First, we diagnose the situation of the brand via consumer research and understand just what is going on. Secondly, we use that diagnosis to build a clear and simple marketing strategy. Finally, with that strategy in place, we select the appropriate tactics to deliver the strategy and win the day. Strategy is a very complicated thing to work out, but should be a very simple thing to eventually explain."</p><p>"Who am I targeting? What is my position to that target? What are my strategic objectives for that target market? My current estimate is that around 20% of brands could adequately or semi-adequately pass this test, and the rest have not the faintest clue how to even approach these questions."</p><p>"Talk to agencies about the quality of the briefs they currently receive from clients, and you will get the kind of hard stare usually reserved for the most outrageous agency gossip." (all three quotes in Chapter 3 Mortification, Tactification, Communification and digitization by Mark Ritson)</p><p>Get this brilliant collection by <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/wiemer" target="_blank">Wiemer Snijders</a> with great minds like Mark Ritson, Peter Field, Eaon Pritchard, Robert van Osnabruggen, Phil Barden, Bob Hoffman, Tom Goodwin, and many many more:<a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Eat-Your-Greens-Wiemer-Snijders/dp/1789016754" target="_blank">https://www.amazon.co.uk/Eat-Your-Greens-Wiemer-Snijders/dp/1789016754</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_eat-greens.jpg?x=1582209597268" alt="" width="300" height="397"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>22. ‘Nudge' by Richard H. Thaler, Cass R. Sunstein&nbsp;</h2><p>It's not often that I recommend a book for just 2 chapters. This is one of them. How to nudge people in the direction you want them to… reading these chapters is like kicking in an open door and refreshing your mind on what you already know – good to get nudged yourself.&nbsp;</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e49fd7de71baeafc6a9d6fdbddde0844c">Chapter 1, ‘Biases and Blunders’: about how we have a pre-trained and preset mind</li><li data-list-item-id="e997bf28172f0c069747c1216767bcf7e">Chapter 5, ‘Choice Architecture’ → how you can influence the choices your customers make by presenting your product or the options</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p>After Part I, honestly, I tuned out and skipped the rest. Like many books, a very strong opening, a less strong middle, and a moah end.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/e123ded4-4659-4cff-bc14-e8427bbfbd51/800_nudgethalersunstein.jpg?x=1714208157976" alt="Nudge Thaler Sunstein" width="300" height="auto"></p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><strong>23. </strong>‘Very Good Copy’ by&nbsp;Eddie Shleyner&nbsp;</h2><p>‘This book gives you more sound, simple copywriting advice per page than anything I read’ (Drayton Bird, Ogilvy). I second this. I ate the book for breakfast on a Saturday morning.&nbsp;</p><p>You will be inspired.&nbsp;</p><p>Read it.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/d9233b4a-8763-4c9c-93de-cf82b467ecbb/800_verygoodcopy-eddieshleyner.jpeg?x=1722602422041" alt="Very good copy - Eddie Shleyner" width="300" height="auto"></p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>24. 'A Self-Help Guide for Copywriters: A resource for writing headlines and building creative confidence' by Dan Nelken</h2><p>Another gem on copywriting. If you want to be inspired and know all the tricks for great headlines, don't look any further.&nbsp;</p><p>Dan teaches you how to think in buckets, how to fill these buckets, and let your creativity flow.&nbsp;</p><p>For me, the most valuable was ‘the benefit of the benefit’ to get your headline. If you think about the benefit of your product, what's the benefit of that benefit?&nbsp;</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="ea843e1d1607ec6ce213084342a3401e2">If you buy a playhouse for your kids, the benefit is they'll have fun with it; the benefit of the benefit is that you'll have some rest when your kids are playing.</li><li data-list-item-id="ea985aab35970f58878d8dae299b0e60e">If you buy a new bed for your dog, the benefit is that your dog will love it and sleep in (on?) it; the benefit of the benefit is that the hairy scruffy dog will not sleep on your bed anymore. ‘all you buy is more space in your bed’</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/262b525c-0055-49b2-b7da-6650efcdd830/800_selfhelpguideforcopywriters.png?x=1680021467916" alt="self help guide for copywriters"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;"><span>25. ‘Writing for Busy Readers’ by&nbsp;Todd Rogers&nbsp;and&nbsp;Jessica Lasky-Fink</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span>You have to simplify your writing to get busy readers to read. In this book, you'll learn </span>how to write better to communicate more effectively. Todd explains it all by 6 princpiples.&nbsp;</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e4b686559297a1518a4cb97477bc69994">Less is more</li><li data-list-item-id="ecf0d84900a1d7abcb9d90e41ab509519">Make reading easy</li><li data-list-item-id="ec85c94226b984b57e092fff6fbd3f009">Design for easy navigation</li><li data-list-item-id="ed885ad7192034fe650910cb23203af64">Use enough formatting, but no more</li><li data-list-item-id="e2f5be93ff99e9ae02b86a5c9baf9a720">Tell readers why they should care</li><li data-list-item-id="e77ddcedac9807378cff15ebaf9654087">Make responding easy</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p>This book is a must-read for everyone. From the CMO and senior marketing manager to the content producer and intern. It's so good that I even dedicated a page to it: ‘<a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/writing-for-busy-readers-simplify-your-writing-to-make-reading-easy/" target="_blank">Writing for busy readers; simplify your writing to make reading easy</a>’.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><a href="https://writingforbusyreaders.com/" target="_blank"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/4176dd11-e8b1-4a1e-83e8-e30257df1fbf/800_writingforbusyreaders.png?x=1717591214990" alt="Writing for Busy Readers" width="300" height="auto"></a></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp; &nbsp;</p><h2>26. ‘Simply said’ by Jay Sullivan</h2><p>I thought I knew quite some tips and tricks on presenting, writing and how to behave in meetings… this book taught me some new sh*t. Again. And again. And again. A must-read for anyone who can put their ego to the side and wants to improve their communication skills. &nbsp;A few highlights on how to put and keep your audience in the first place.&nbsp;</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="edd2665aa20d46a2ba7dfcb999c68b5b4">Persuasive format: a very simple and effective ppt template to get your audience into action within 8 slides (p28)</li><li data-list-item-id="ed51dfa516f748f6a88f9b5218dcdcc16">Knowledge pyramid: ‘you don’t know what you don't know' is the greatest information out there (p73). And how to get this unknown information to the table by asking closed or open questions</li><li data-list-item-id="ee6aa43782456d4d5ae02138e935fe905">How to tell your story and keep your audiences' attention with a graph or chart without overwhelming them: RIDE. Read the headline, Identify the graph, Define the parameters and main points, and Explain why you are showing your audience this information (p104)</li><li data-list-item-id="e18d6432633ab1a0e45e27a17e32af939">Amazing tips for better and clearer writing</li><li data-list-item-id="ef2dcd18aa07b1476b7ec583d93c180a0">And much much more</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/800_simplysaidpersuasiveroadmap.png?x=1646415329213" alt="simply said persuasive roadmap"></p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/800_simplysaid-cover.png?x=1646415313101" alt="simplysaid-cover"></p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>27. 'Creativity. A Short and Cheerful Guide' by&nbsp;John Cleese</h2><p>A sweet and short book on how you can provoke creativity, why the best ideas become even better after a night of sleep, when and why panicking has value, and how to kill your darlings for brevity and soul for not boring people.</p><p>On Audible, it's an entertaining and fast listen of just 60 minutes -- the best 60 minutes you can spend.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/e633e887-1a9e-4946-bba6-d32008bfff3e/800_creativitybyjohncleese.jpg?x=1719220646326" alt="Creativity by John Cleese " width="300" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>28. ‘The Copywriter's Handbook’ by Robert W. Bly.</h2><p>‘A copywriter is a salesperson behind a typewriter.’ This sums up the main reason why you should read ‘The Copywriter's Handbook’ by Robert W. Bly.</p><p>What works for great headlines in content can also work for your social copy: writing to get the attention, that selects an audience, delivering a complete message, and drawing the reader into the body copy (or to click through).</p><p>‘But the goal of advertising is not to be liked, to entertain, or to win advertising awards; it is to sell products. The advertiser, if he is smart, doesn’t care whether people like his commercials or are entertained or amused by them. If they are, fine. But commercials are a means to an end, and the end is increased sales—and profits—for the advertiser. This is a simple and obvious thing, but the majority of copywriters and advertising professionals seem to ignore it.’</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/800_copywritershandbook.jpeg?x=1608561476612" alt=""></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>29. ‘Copywriting Secrets’ by Alan Sharpe</h2><p>Absolutely love this. The proven copy rules: old school advertising print craft by DDB for Volkswagen, can also be applied for social, content, digital, and more these days. Please, read and learn.</p><p>"Before you can write great copy, you need to have a big idea, and before you can have a big idea, you need to have a great insight, and before you can have a great insight, you need to do lots of research." (chapter 1)</p><p>"One of your main jobs as a copywriter is to translate product features into benefits. People buy benefits, not features. Just so we’re clear: a feature is what a product does, and a benefit is what that feature does for me. How do you communicate that benefit in an original way? With a headline that states the feature and a photo that communicates the benefit." (secret 10)</p><p>Or take the video class:<a href="https://www.skillshare.com/classes/30-Copywriting-Secrets-from-the-Best-Ad-Campaign-of-All-Time/1238746914/reviews" target="_blank">https://www.skillshare.com/classes/30-Copywriting-Secrets-from-the-Best-Ad-Campaign-of-All-Time/1238746914/reviews</a></p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_copy-writing-rules-1024x514.png?x=1582209518460" alt="" width="300" height="150"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>30. 'TED Talks Storytelling: 23 Storytelling Techniques from the Best TED Talks' by Akash Karia&nbsp;</h2><p>Checklist for every speaker, steal those cherries with pride to refine your own non-TED deck.</p><p>"The word “you” is regarded as one of the most powerful words in the English language. Why? Because people are interested in themselves!" (p. 47)</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_schermafbeelding-2019-05-07-om-14.29.24-768x525.png?x=1582210285601" alt="" width="300" height="205"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>31. 'Everbody writes' by Ann Handley</h2><p>Stuck in&nbsp;writing? or producing&nbsp;content? Just read this&nbsp;book&nbsp;to get started. With 11 hands-on tips and tricks. One of the very few books I have in paper and do not loan without a significant deposit ;)</p><p>“Giving your audience a gift, how can you best serve them, with a mindset of generosity?” (p29)</p><p>“Produce The Ugly First Draft: that’s basically where you show up and throw up. Write badly. Write as if never one will ever read it.” (p30)</p><p>“Start with ‘dear mom’ and keep a real person in mind. Someone you like, because you want to help this person.’ (p55)</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_img-4985-768x1024.jpg?x=1582210363479" alt="" width="300" height="400"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>32. 'Advertising for skeptics' by Bob Hoffman</h2><p>"Advertising has gotten worse, not better. Rather than creating advertising that is “more relevant, more timely and more likable” we are creating advertising that is more annoying, more disliked, and more avoided."</p><p>"One study showed that of all forms of advertising, the eight types most disliked by consumers were all forms of online advertising."</p><p>For the necessary critical view on online advertising by Bob Hoffman -- Advertising For Skeptics</p><p>Must read book to broaden your horizon with a different perspective.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_advertisingforskeptics.jpg?x=1603894276596" alt="" width="300" height="451"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>33. 'Make Your Idea Matter: Stand out with a better story' by Bernadette Jiwa</h2><p>Great no-nonsense checklist to make your idea, brand, product or whatever you are doing, sparkle. A few quotes:</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e1cdf17809514050323b7b12c5d6e17d5">The story makes the product better.</li><li data-list-item-id="ecd62114627cf007b0c3027ac1cc34439">No matter what you’re pitching, selling or talking about, talk to one person. You might want to appeal to.</li><li data-list-item-id="e16fca93191f1edd248ae729d6768ce93">Most companies wonder how they will get their product noticed, before thinking about why on earth it will matter to customers.</li><li data-list-item-id="e120fe11fea6b93a9f28126d0b58b2796">What makes anything you do unique is your voice. The story that only you can tell, from a perspective that nobody else can have. There is more than one way to say something important that needs to be said, and there are a million ways to bring ideas that matter to the world.</li><li data-list-item-id="e4e8574895b73d1a57670b2097d3234d5">Unsubscribers, critics and naysayers are a gift. Say a mental thanks to them for saving you the job of working out who your right people are. Then go out and do everything in your power to woo the people who matter.</li><li data-list-item-id="e939900ee4c91c1037e25b3391a3393a0">What you want your website to do is probably very different from what your customers want it to do. The trick (as with most elements of your business) is to build for customers and community first so you can realize the benefits later.</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_bernadettejiwamakeyourideamatter.png?x=1584074943251" alt="" width="300" height="385"></p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>34. 'How to Win Friends and Influence People' by Dale Carnegie</h2><p>One of the best books ever. Loved and love it. Written in&nbsp;1938&nbsp;and still amazingly&nbsp;relevant. The best-kept secret in&nbsp;people&nbsp;and&nbsp;expectations&nbsp;management.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_schermafbeelding-2019-06-06-om-14.25.51.png?x=1582210395239" alt="" width="300" height="462"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>35. ‘Barking Up the Wrong Tree: The Surprising Science Behind Why Everything You Know About Success Is (Mostly) Wrong' by Eric Barker</h2><p>Everything others tell you about success? Some of it is wrong. Most of it is incomplete. All of it is worth questioning.</p><p>Eric Barker backs that up with research. How schools reward conformity, not potential. And that context is everything for qualities that make people wildly successful or sometimes destroy them.</p><p>Each chapter flips a conventional belief on its head. Then gives you the science to back it up.</p><p>The most important decision you can make is figuring out what the right game is for you. Read it before someone else defines your line of success for you.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/d979e9ea-3c28-4b2c-b415-d0af85dd3783/800_barkingupthewrongtreeericbarker.jpg?x=1781065217621" alt="Barking up the wrong tree Eric Barker" width="300" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2><span>36. ‘Pitlane Lessons: What F1 Can Teach You About Life and Work' by Marc Priestley</span></h2><p>F1 runs on individual glory, but it is built on collective performance. Priestley writes from the inside — the pitlane, not the podium.</p><p>Chapter two hit hardest: innovation isn't what you do, it's how you think. The rest follows from there; teamwork, how to celebrate properly, why failure is as essential as winning, how to stay humble when everything is on fire. Simple ideas. Harder to execute than they sound.</p><p>If you think you already know how to work well with others, this book will quietly prove otherwise.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/d0cefeeb-2bb4-4812-9135-7e869218ddaf/800_pitlanelessonsbypriestley.jpg?x=1777698224564" alt="Pitlane lessons by Priestley" width="300" height="auto"></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">37. 'Learning How to Learn' by Barbara Oakley PhD</h2><p>If you want to improve and speed up your learning skills, this book is for you. Barbara explains why your mind needs to wander to be able to focus, how your brain makes connections, and how you can learn better by using metaphors. Also, how to tackle procrastination effectively and much more.</p><p>I had the pleasure of meeting Barbara in person; I have no words for such an amazing, lovely lady who blows you away with her knowledge and explains in great detail how your brain works and how you can let your brain work for you.</p><p>Initially, this book is for children, but don't let that fool you. Anyone can use a little help learning to learn.&nbsp;</p><p>'Learning How to Learn: How to Succeed in School Without Spending All Your Time Studying; A Guide for Kids and Teens' by Barbara Oakley PhD, Terrence Sejnowski, PhD, Alistair McConville</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/54e6fc67-e0a9-4ab4-b3ee-e611a15e432a/800_learningtolearnbybarbaraoakley.jpg?x=1728670052333" alt="Learning to learn by Barbara Oakley" width="300" height="auto"></p><hr><h2>38. ‘The Art of Thinking Clearly’ Paperback by Rolf Dobelli</h2><p>It is 99 sweet and short chapters with wisdom and things you already knew yet forgot. Some common sense about confirmation bias, prejudices, and false truths.&nbsp;</p><p>A dear friend recommended this book, and as soon as I started to listen on Audible, I realized I already read it on my Kindle. Hence, if I have it double, for sure, it's worth the read. Everybody can learn something from this book.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/d8ec30ec-606b-4670-be62-8b8943aa96b2/800_thinkingclearlyrolfdobelli.jpg?x=1687671361439" alt="thinking clearly rolf dobelli"></p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>39. ‘The Let Them Theory, A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can’t Stop Talking About’ by Mel Robbins&nbsp;</h2><p>How do you let go of the need to control or overreact to others’ behavior? And instead of getting frustrated or trying to change people, you can ‘let them’. While you let others act as they will, you also say, ‘Let me,’ and focus on what you can control.&nbsp;</p><p>An excellent, inspiring read with recognizable examples and frustrations we all encounter daily with coworkers, family, and friends. Also available as 🎙️ &nbsp;<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/nl/podcast/the-mel-robbins-podcast/id1646101002?i=1000681031864" target="_blank">podcast</a>.&nbsp;</p><p>Highly recommend. Small personal note: don't listen to the audiobook in one go; her high energy can be a bit overwhelming and a bit too much for us Europeans.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/d1dd3070-9997-4385-b0df-f3f0f35e775d/800_letthemmelrobbins.jpg?x=1738822223358" alt="Let Them Mel Robbins" width="300" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;"><span>40. 'Think Faster, Talk Smarter' by&nbsp;Matt Abrahams</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span>This book is more than about ' how to speak successfully when you're put on the spot'. I'm blown away by the simple insights, from common sense and wisdom, sanity checking the reality (and yourself), to how to calm your nerves. In the meanwhile, it's putting things in perspective and emphasizing having joy in what you do.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span>It is a unique and inspiring combination of ‘How to win friends and influence people' by Dale Carnegie and the TED talks and public speaking books. If you're presenting or speaking or just want to improve your communication skills in business and personal life, read this book.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/72f24d0b-3df5-4d69-b9de-2c62eb538c71/800_thinkfastertalksmarternbspmattabrahams.jpg?x=1700294868829" alt="Think Faster, Talk Smarter&nbsp;Matt Abrahams"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>41. ‘The power of vulnerability’ by Brene Brown</h2><p>This is one of the books I listen to and re-listen. At least twice a year, if not more often.&nbsp;</p><p>It's about daring to show your strength by daring to show your weakness. It's about not taking things overly seriously. It's about not giving a f*ck what others think as long as they are not in your shoes. This made me a different woman.&nbsp;</p><p>'It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better.</p><p>&nbsp;The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause;&nbsp;</p><p>who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.' [Theodore Roosevelt]</p><p>Next to that, how Brene tells her story on stage is contagious and inspires me to do better. To be vulnerable and have fun at the same time.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/cddd5b09-82aa-473b-bdde-78d523ed2adf/800_powerofvulnerabilitybrenebrown.jpg?x=1725620708054" alt="power of vulnerability brene brown" width="300" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">42. ‘Comfort Crisis’ by&nbsp;Michael Easter&nbsp;</h2><p style="margin-left:0px;">‘Today’s comfort is tomorrow's discomfort'. This book is all about how we continuously move our goalposts. When we reach our desired goal, we're happy and content for a brief moment, and almost immediately, we strive for the next better, more, richer goal.&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">Pretty relevant for today's fast-moving, over-consuming, high-self-expecting, crazy-driving society.&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">A very nice, light, and easy read on a heavy topic.&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;">Highly recommend, I loved every moment of it. In an entertaining story of a freezing and starving backcountry 30-day adventure in arctic Alaska where he needs to shoot wildlife to get food, Michael taps into topics that f*ck up today's society and human mankind.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/f288f7ee-0c74-4903-bab2-c89667483ae9/800_comfortcrisisbymichaeleaster.jpg?x=1722699974784" alt="Comfort Crisis by Michael Easter" width="300" height="auto"></p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>43. ‘Slow Productivity: The Lost Art of Accomplishment Without Burnout’ by Cal Newport&nbsp;</h2><p>According to Carl, we achieve more by doing less. I fell in love with this philosophy, and it makes total sense.&nbsp;</p><ol><li data-list-item-id="edc402a091b828afe34f1b5a835a676af">Do fewer things.</li><li data-list-item-id="e90a4f97c1a6e69d804b813a237942c72">Work at a natural pace.</li><li data-list-item-id="e00f16acaf4d3a0212cf19868c38d8ce4">Obsess over quality.</li></ol><p>If you focus on one thing at a time, when you are most productive, and obsess about quality, you'll produce great work. For me, it works: doing fewer things in the early morning and only publishing what makes me tick.&nbsp;</p><p>Give it a try. The audiobook can be quite a tough, monotonous listen from time to time; stick to it, and you'll not be disappointed.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/990c0152-04f5-4b5a-b77d-b32b24b56541/800_slowproductivitybycalnewport.jpg?x=1711351309189" alt="Slow Productivity by Cal Newport" width="300" height="auto"></p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;"><span><strong>44. 'The Art of Gathering' </strong>by&nbsp;Priya Parker&nbsp;</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"><span style="text-align:start;">‘An exciting new approach to how we gather that will transform the ways we spend our time together—at home, at work, in our communities, and beyond.’ The 4,6 rating on Amazon speaks for itself.&nbsp;</span></span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"><span style="text-align:start;">It makes you rethink how we meet and gather and how our choices can influence the outcome. If you want to have more effective meetings and better meetups and improve your hosting skills, this book is for you.&nbsp;</span></span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"><span style="text-align:start;">Just to be clear, Priya writes about purpose on a very abstract level while feeding your brain with daily examples. This book is not a to-do list or checklist for improving your meetings, it makes you think and do better.&nbsp;</span></span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"><span style="text-align:start;">&nbsp;</span></span></p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/aeae7a8b-04a2-47d9-9e7f-ab9e2981f8ff/800_theartofgatheringbypriyaparker.jpg?x=1717592170730" alt="The Art of Gathering by Priya Parker" width="300" height="auto"></p><p style="margin-left:0px;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp; &nbsp;</p><h2>45. ‘Invisible Women. Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men’ by Caroline Criado-Perez</h2><p>This eye-opener on how the world is biased for men is underpinned by data and research. Caroline spoons up all the stories, which can be a bit much and overwhelming. If you get angry easily, my advice is not to binge the book from cover to cover.&nbsp;</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="ecaf4e7a06c3c09e50b056571cc795410"><strong>Crash test dummies</strong>: Car safety tests use male dummies, which makes vehicles less safe for women, who are 47% more likely to be seriously injured in crashes. Volvo changed this in 1995, and only in 2019 did it launch<span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"><span style="text-align:left;"> an initiative for equal representation in crash test dummies.</span></span></li><li data-list-item-id="e3740bca4a4bb2dcde494f415adad30e3"><strong>Medical research</strong>: Women are underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in misdiagnoses and ineffective treatments, as female-specific symptoms and responses are often overlooked. This underrepresentation is caused by historical bias, hormone variability, and lack of awareness.</li><li data-list-item-id="e2f9d8a7d1140b67c4fcc22a5ea67534d"><strong>Public transport</strong>: Public transport systems favor male commuting patterns, from A to B and B to A, neglecting women's 'trip-chaining A-B-C-D-A' needs. This makes it less convenient, more expensive, and more time-consuming for women.</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/46a00fd8-d7c0-491e-97a8-cebf23c9aa35/800_invisiblewomenbycarolinecriadoperez.jpg?x=1716622378272" alt="Invisible women by Caroline Criado Perez" width="300" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>46. ‘Body Language' with Vanessa Van Edwards in ‘Dairy of a CEO’ podcast</h2><p>This month, it's not a book; it's a podcast that blew my mind. An <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/nl/podcast/the-body-language-expert-stop-using-this-its-making/id1291423644?i=1000679711461" target="_blank">interview with Vanessa Van Edwards about how body language and voice are important for good communication</a>.&nbsp;</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e0ec3be81c6198f27a7d79ccca939d9e2"><span><strong>82% of first impressions</strong> come from warmth and competence. Research shows that <strong>sitting within 25 feet of a high performer</strong> can improve your own performance by 15%. <strong>TED Talks that went viral </strong>often had speakers using more gestures.&nbsp;</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e9cb65ea17d64bf07902d6d3d8af15310"><strong>Gestures matter</strong>: <span>Gestures add power to your story. When your hand movements align with your words, they create a sense of trust and honesty that resonates. Our brains are hardwired to notice gestures because they reveal real emotions and intentions. For example, when someone emphasizes a big point with big natural gestures, it makes the message clearer and more engaging.</span><br><br><span>It’s also incredibly hard to lie with gestures—our hands rarely betray us. When what you say matches how you express it, it reinforces your authenticity and credibility.&nbsp;</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e520e99c6ce70bc58cbb9cb615390e8d5"><strong>Confidence in speech</strong>: <span>Vocal variety is about changing your tone, pitch, and volume to make your message clear and interesting. For example, using a "Ted Talk voice" can show importance and make your audience pay attention.</span><br><br><span>Switching your voice style, like using a "numbers voice" for statistics, helps organize your ideas and makes key points easier to remember.</span><br><br><span>How you finish your sentences also matters. Speaking with a downward tone shows confidence, but an upward tone can sound unsure and hurt your credibility.</span></li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span>📺 'Diary of a CEO’ on </span><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHUrdELKjDw" target="_blank"><span>YouTube</span></a></p><p><span>🎙️ ‘Diary of a CEO’ on </span><a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/nl/podcast/the-diary-of-a-ceo-with-steven-bartlett/id1291423644?i=1000679711461" target="_blank"><span>Apple podcasts</span></a><span> or </span><a href="https://open.spotify.com/episode/285mKHFB4oCTDlVPTVa4Zu?si=e0db66d2e56f4ae9" target="_blank"><span>Spotify</span></a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/nl/podcast/the-body-language-expert-stop-using-this-its-making/id1291423644?i=1000679711461" target="_blank"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/cea1a338-7593-4687-9907-ec365155d7a0/800_doacvanessaedwards.png?x=1737783047295" alt="DOAC Vanessa Edwards" width="300" height="auto"></a></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p><h2>47. 'Get Your Sh*t Together’ by Sarah Knight</h2><p>“But the mental clutter was slowly taking up residence in my brain the way my extra luggage was taking up space in my friend’s basement” (page 264)</p><p>Ever felt like being ‘stuck’ and not moving forward in work and or life? Then this is the book for you, read her hands-on&nbsp;tips&nbsp;and&nbsp;tricks on&nbsp;how to get your&nbsp;mental&nbsp;sh*t together and do get those things done. Rereading this every few months when I start procrastinating ;)</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_shit-sarahknight2-768x768.png?x=1582209400686" alt="" width="300" height="300"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>48. 'The ONE Thing' by Gary Kelly and Jay Papasan</h2><p>Ever felt being stuck and procrastinating? Get that sh*t done by "creating your own strategy is to focus and to make a choice. You simply cannot do everything simultaneously."</p><p>"… the quality of the answer is directly determined by the quality of the question.</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e0833c10e3a88007a81b9d3651e5e2fa7">Ask the wrong question, get the wrong answer.</li><li data-list-item-id="ec8a920a2bc39dc2abe5f16e681384c77">Ask the right question, get the right answer.</li><li data-list-item-id="ee03ae773b3e31d3b60c09a742539867a">Ask the most powerful question possible, and the answer can be life alternating." (chapter 10 The Focusing Question)</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_one-thing.jpg?x=1582209766561" alt="" width="300" height="433"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>49. ‘Thrive’ by Arianna Huffington</h2><p>Redefining success and adding the third metric to 'money' and 'power'. Fell in luv with especially the first half of the book. Could feel a bit feminine for some of the men, shuffle your ego dudes and get to her point on success and how to thrive in life.</p><p>"Lacking a line of royalty in America, (..) one gains today's throne not by fortune of birth but by visible markers of success, money and power."</p><p>"... over the long term, money and power are like a two-legged stool - you can balance on them for a while, but eventually you're going to topple over.'</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_img-4741-768x1024.jpg?x=1582210259982" alt="" width="300" height="400"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>50. 'If I Could Tell You Just One Thing…: Encounters with Remarkable People and Their Most Valuable Advice' by Richard Reed</h2><p>"If I could tell you just one thing"… it is to read this book.</p><p>Great for inspiration and insights. The <strong>*</strong> reviews on Amazon speak for themselves.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_tell-one-thing.jpg?x=1582210482825" alt="" width="300" height="162"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>51. 'Daily Reflections for Highly Effective People: Living the 7 Habits of Highly Effective People Every Day' by Stephen R. Covey</h2><p>Love Stephen Coveys' daily no-brainers' advice.</p><p>"Most people say their main fault is a lack of discipline. On deeper thought, I believe that the basic problem is that their priorities have not become deeply planted in their hearts and minds. They attempt to give priority to important but not urgent activities and integrate them into their lives through self-discipline along." Long story short: it is not the lack of discipline, it is a matter of choice.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_img-5473-768x1024.jpg?x=1582210509485" alt="" width="300" height="400"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>52. ‘Don't Sweat the Small Stuff' by Richard Carlson</h2><p>'There are two rules for living in harmony. 1) Don’t sweat the small stuff and 2) It’s all small stuff. (p. 3)'</p><p>Great quote for that often much-needed&nbsp;reality check&nbsp;:) in ‘Don't Sweat the Small Stuff' by Richard Carlson.</p><p>'Turn Your Melodrama into a Mellow-Drama, (...) we blow things out of proportion and make a big deal out of little things. (...) When I get too worked up or start taking myself too seriously (which happens more than I like to admit), I say to myself something like, “Here I go again. My soap opera is starting.” (p. 147)'</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_schermafbeelding-2019-08-06-om-10.49.48-768x901.png?x=1582210572040" alt="" width="300" height="353"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>53. 'The Ideal Team Player: How to Recognize and Cultivate The Three Essential Virtues' by Patrick M. Lencioni</h2><p>Not often that I am blown away by a book, inhaling the words cover to cover in less than 24h. Complicated stuff explained in a simple way. How to find the ideal team player: humble hungry and smart,</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_schermafbeelding-2019-08-29-om-08.55.39.png?x=1582210606868" alt="" width="300" height="258"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>54. 'Atomic Habits' by James Clear</h2><p>How to get long term gain? In Atomic Habit James Clear explains the&nbsp;science&nbsp;of forming habits with hands-on tips and tricks. Must read!</p><p>"Small changes often appear to make no difference until you cross a critical threshold. The most powerful outcomes of any compounding process are delayed. You need to be patient."</p><p>"We are so focused on figuring out the best approach that we never get around to taking action. As Voltaire once wrote, “The best is the enemy of the good.” "We do not change by snapping our fingers and deciding to be someone entirely new. We change bit by bit, day by day, habit by habit."</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_atomichabits.jpg?x=1582210695877" alt="" width="300" height="300"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_51vtwxickel.-sx329-bo1204203200-.jpg?x=1582210710924" alt="" width="300" height="453"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>55. 'Mindset: The New Psychology of Success' by Carol S. Dweck</h2><p>Never stop learning. How to get a growth mindset: to learn, to thrive, to fuel yourself with feedback.</p><p>In 'Mindset' Carol Dweck explains the power of mindset. 'In this brilliant book, she shows how success in school, work, sports, the arts, and almost every area of human endeavor can be dramatically influenced by how we think about our talents and abilities. People with a fixed mindset—those who believe that abilities are fixed—are less likely to flourish than those with a growth mindset—those who believe that abilities can be developed.'&nbsp;</p><p>Note: the second visual is stolen with pride from Google, not directly related to Dwecks' book.&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_mindset.jpg?x=1582210737568" alt="" width="300" height="300"></p><p style="text-align:center;"><img style="margin:5px;" src="//content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/500_growthmindset.jpg?x=1582210957750" alt="" width="300" height="300"></p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>56. 'Living with a SEAL: 31 Days Training with the Toughest Man on the Planet' by Jesse Itzler</h2><p>Dare to challenge yourself. As we all know, out of your comfort zone is where the magic happens. If you dare to push your (physical) limits, you'll grow mentally. Jesse takes you on his journey.</p><p>&nbsp;Be inspired; that's all I can say. Even better if you read 'Can't hurt me' by David Goggins first.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/800_livingwithaseal.png?x=1674148616360" alt="living with a seal">&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>57. 'The 5 Second Rule. Transform your Life, Work, and Confidence with Everyday Courage' by Mel Robbins</h2><p>What if the biggest thing holding you back is the five seconds between having an idea and talking yourself out of it?</p><p>Mel Robbins’ simple rule is this: the moment you feel the impulse to act, count <strong>5-4-3-2-1… GO</strong> and move before your brain starts inventing excuses.</p><p>It’s a small trick with a surprisingly big impact. It helps you stop procrastinating, start the thing you’ve been avoiding, and break the endless doom-scroll loop.</p><p>From personal experience: it actually works.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/800_5secondrule.png?x=1674148994203" alt="5second rule"></p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>58. 'Unmasked. <span>The Ultimate Guide to ADHD, Autism, and Neurodivergence</span>' by Ellie Middleton</h2><p>Struggling with why you do certain things or have typical habits? This is for you. Ellie is an <span style="text-align:start;">autistic and ADHD creator, writer, and consultant. She unveils how and why autistic, ADHD, and ADD function at their best.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span style="text-align:start;">Sounds a bit fuzzy, yet this book brought me so much insight to understand why I need my morning run to clear my mind, why I hyperfocus and can't let go of things, or why I like to be alone after social events.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span style="text-align:start;">And most importantly, I learned to embrace these odd, quirky behaviors of mine and thrive, not despite them but because of them.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/bdd2c25c-6298-48d3-a25a-8c39b89fb5d3/800_unmasked-theultimateguidetoadhdautismandneurodivergencebyelliemiddleton.jpg?x=1737781235967" alt="Unmasked - The Ultimate Guide to ADHD, Autism, and Neurodivergence by Ellie Middleton" width="300" height="auto"></p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>59. ‘Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed, and Lost Idealism’ by Sarah Wynn-Williams</h2><p>This is a behind-the-scenes look at Meta, which has been much discussed and controversial. Sarah critiques the company's internal culture, leadership decisions, and ethical lapses, highlighting its global sociopolitical impact.</p><p>It reads a bit like a thriller from a different, greedy world, yet it is an autobiography. It<span> fits very well in our current (April 2025) unstable geopolitical climate.</span></p><p><span><strong>Warning, this is not a light read.&nbsp;</strong></span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/723f8aa8-5904-47b8-b585-64ecc9db92e6/800_carelesspeoplesarahwynnwilliams.png?x=1744308676715" alt="Careless people Sarah Wynn Williams" width="300" height="auto">&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>60. ‘Be Useful’ by Arnold Schwarzenegger</h2><p>‘<span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"><span style="text-align:start;">Arnold’s stratospheric success happened as part of a process. As the result of clear vision, big thinking, hard work, direct communication, resilient problem-solving, open-minded curiosity, and a commitment to giving back. All of it guided by the one lesson Arnold’s father hammered into him above all: be useful. As Arnold conquered every realm he entered, he kept his father’s adage close to his heart.’&nbsp;</span></span></p><p><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"><span style="text-align:start;">‘Too many of us struggle to disconnect from our self-pity and connect to our purpose. At an early age, Arnold forged the mental tools to build the ladder out of the poverty and narrow-mindedness of his rural Austrian hometown, tools he used to add rung after rung from there. Now he shares that wisdom with all of us. As he puts it, no one is going to come rescue you—you only have yourself. The good news, it turns out, is that you are all you need.’ (</span></span><a href="https://www.audible.com/pd/Be-Useful-Audiobook/B0C1HW33G3?eac_link=db2dWXkJ0yIl&ref=web_search_eac_asin_1&eac_selected_type=asin&eac_selected=B0C1HW33G3&qid=FGWjJmg13N&eac_id=132-0578659-3241340_FGWjJmg13N&sr=1-1" target="_blank"><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"><span style="text-align:start;">Audible</span></span></a><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"><span style="text-align:start;">)</span></span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/44f1a137-88d3-4027-8fbc-cd6cdb028b82/800_arnoldschwarzeneggerbeuseful.jpg?x=1704169089357" alt="Arnold Schwarzenegger Be Useful" width="300" height="auto"></p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>61. ‘Kitchen Confidential' by Anthony Bourdain</h2><p>Just because there's nothing wrong with a biography from such greatness that shakes up kitchen and displays the other side. With lots and lots of love for food.&nbsp;</p><p>What I learned from his book… always be honest. Even if it's the ugly truth, as long as you're honest, you can always be proud and look at yourself in the mirror.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/c55028be-0cb1-4c49-9dad-40aed8247865/800_kitchenconfidentialaudible.jpg?x=1692720705517" alt="Kitchen Confidential Audible"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>62. ‘<span>Before & Laughter' by Jimmy Carr&nbsp;</span></h2><p>What stuck with me most and made the biggest impression from his book is how comedians are most successful when they're brutally honest. They say the things no one else dares to say, but wrapped in humor, they get away with it. Marketers could really learn from that. I know I certainly did.</p><p>It’s a sweet, honest must-read for anyone who wants to improve themselves and their communications.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:500/auto;width:500px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/ece3bed1-10ab-4613-b17b-e62859e29110/1920_beforeandlaughterbyjimmycarr.jpg?x=1751814108785" alt="Before and laughter by Jimmy Carr" width="500" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">63. ‘Screw It Let’s Do It. Lessons in Life and Business' by Richard Branson</h2><p>If you ever are looking for a nudge to start your own business or take that leap? This book is for you.&nbsp;</p><p>No more words needed; just read it and let me know if it sparked to change your life and work.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:300/auto;width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/30e238e3-357c-4afd-97a1-b3ba924f9021/800_screwitlet039sdoitrichardbranson.jpg?x=1733069118492" alt="Screw It, Let's Do It Richard Branson" width="300" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>64. ‘The Art of Resilience: Strategies for an Unbreakable Mind and Body’ by Ross Edgley</h2><p>Wow. In one word. From the stoic to the smile to get through the pain. Inspirational. And makes you stop whining and complaining. You always can do better and realize you have an unmet potential that will surprise you.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/b711f6f0-d460-4298-b317-673d8575e9e6/800_arrofresiliencerossedgley.jpg?x=1692721074815" alt="Arr of resilience Ross Edgley">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>65. ‘The story of Lululemon: the stretch black pants’ by Chip Wilson</h2><p>All about market insights, strategy, and marketing. Chip Wilson tells the story behind the brand and the business. Along the way, he explains how he uses trends in society and innovation to thrive in business.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/800_lululemon.png?x=1674148528364" alt="lululemon"></p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><h2>66. 'Can't Hurt Me: Master Your Mind and Defy the Odds' by David Goggins</h2><p>It's almost scary what you can accomplish if you set your mind to it. And if you're willing to go deep. David takes you into his darkest place. Weirdly reading him suffer makes me dig deeper to achieve my own goals.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;<img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/800_canthurtme.png?x=1674148656868" alt="cant hurt me">&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><category><![CDATA[about me,books,B2B,strategy]]></category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 06:28:44 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/73f907be-7027-4f4d-a03d-c53eafb3fd2c/500_bestmarketingbooks2026.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/73f907be-7027-4f4d-a03d-c53eafb3fd2c/500_bestmarketingbooks2026.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/73f907be-7027-4f4d-a03d-c53eafb3fd2c/bestmarketingbooks2026.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[best marketing books 2026]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>AI explained for human beings: from prompt engineering to agents to agentic</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/ai-explained-for-human-beings-from-prompt-engineering-to-agents-to-agentic/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/ai-explained-for-human-beings-from-prompt-engineering-to-agents-to-agentic/</guid><pp:caseid>751724</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>You ordered a prompt course. Your employees want to build agents</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p><span>Most people treat AI like a search engine. They type a question, read the answer, and move on. But it is the lowest possible use of the technology sitting in front of them.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>To use AI well, three things matter.</span></p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e6dc80dc17a160b86352299f2d3a83996"><span><strong>How you prompt.</strong> The quality of your question determines the quality of the answer. It is learning to communicate with AI.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="eeb896d30c83aa1feb669787bc483c70a"><span><strong>What you build.</strong> Configuring your AI to personalize it. For the prompts, once you know what works, you can turn it into an agent. An agent is a preset prompt, instructions you build once and reuse. You or your team provide the input. The agent does the thinking.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e2a3c215a3d02f11904c740cc306b7a7f"><span><strong>How far you automate.</strong> When an agent no longer needs a human to start it, it becomes agentic AI. It acts on its own. It monitors, processes, and reports, without anyone clicking start.</span></li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span>These are the differences between saving hours a week and redesigning how your organisation works.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:800/auto;width:800px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/8885843a-c753-4a6f-a7e5-4099c85747bb/7_levels_ai_savviness.png?x=1779764391572" alt="7_levels_ai_savviness" width="800" height="auto"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><h2><span>What are the 7 levels of AI savviness?</span></h2><p><span>Here is what those levels look like in practice.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span><strong>Level 0. You have an account</strong> You signed up for ChatGPT, Claude, or Copilot. Maybe tried it once. But in practice, you don't do anything with it. The tab is open somewhere.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span><strong>Level 1. AI as a fancy search engine</strong> You ask a question and read the answer. That's it. You don't explain who you are or what you're trying to achieve. A fancier Google.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span><strong>Level 2. Prompt engineering</strong> You discover that a better question gets a better answer. You add context: who you are, what you need, and who it's for. This is called prompt engineering, but it's really just learning to communicate with AI.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span><strong>Level 3. AI in your workflow</strong> </span>You configure your AI once: who you are, how you work, what you need. You structurally use it for recurring tasks like summarising a report or preparing for a board meeting. The prompts are yours. Unlike an agent, you can't easily share them with colleagues.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span><strong>Level 4. You build an AI agent</strong> An agent is a preset prompt, the instructions you build once and reuse. You use it yourself, and you can share it with your colleagues too. They don't need to know how it works, they just give the agent their input. Someone still clicks ‘start’.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span><strong>Level 5. Agentic AI</strong> No human needed to set things in motion, it’s automated. A new report arrives? The agent picks it up, processes it, and sends a summary to the board. Automatically, without anyone looking over its shoulder.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span><strong>Level 6. AI director</strong> </span>You no longer manage individual agents. You design the system they operate in: the rules, the boundaries, and the QA and accountability structure. When something goes wrong, it sits with you. Not the technology. Not the agent.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Where most organisations get it wrong</span></h2><p><span>Most companies still think they need to train on level 2. Prompt engineering. How to ask better questions. Their employees have already moved on.</span></p><p><span>According to the </span><a href="https://smarterx.ai/" target="_blank"><span>SmarterX report</span></a><span>, 58% of employees want to build workflows. 51% want to work with agents. 45% want no-code tools. Only 15% cite prompt engineering as a training need.</span></p><p><span>The workforce has self-educated past where most training programmes begin.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Board-level leadership runs to two extremes, and both leave the organisation exposed</h2><p><span>Two things are happening, and both are a problem.</span></p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e50f115d8cf2c8b6a58ec6f76f23101aa"><span><strong>Digital shame: </strong>kn</span>owing AI ownership belongs at the top, and not moving anyway. <span>Most board members are stuck at level 1 or 2.&nbsp;</span><br><br><span>They know they </span><a href="https://digitaleschaamte.nl/en" target="_blank"><span>need to step up</span></a><span>. </span>But the topic feels overwhelming and there is never enough time to act on it. So they don't.<br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e64e1c4648f3b81cc84810c2ac849b4ac"><span><strong>Most advanced AI users. </strong>CEOs and senior leaders are, according to the </span><a href="https://smarterx.ai/" target="_blank"><span>SmarterX</span></a><span> report, personally the most advanced AI adopters in their organisation. Think level 4 or 5.&nbsp;</span><br><br><span>They build, they automate, they move fast. They think their employees are where they are. A blindspot, because the majority of their organisation is at level 2, and hungry to reach level 3.</span></li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>You have two options</span></h2><p>Start privately. <a href="https://digitaleschaamte.nl/en" target="_blank">Get yourself to level 4 </a>before you ask your organisation to.&nbsp;</p><p>Or lead publicly. Move first. Show your organisation what <a href="https://www.tomorrowboard.nl/" target="_blank">AI-literate leadership</a> looks like in practice.</p><p>Both work. Doing nothing does not.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,500+ professionals</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;"><span>→&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p>]]></description><category><![CDATA[AI,strategy]]></category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 21:13:47 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/ee296688-01d3-4d4f-9241-8183360c231c/500_7levelsofai.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/ee296688-01d3-4d4f-9241-8183360c231c/500_7levelsofai.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/ee296688-01d3-4d4f-9241-8183360c231c/7levelsofai.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[7 levels of AI]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>The ones who hate AI the most, use it the most</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-ones-who-hate-ai-the-most-use-it-the-most/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-ones-who-hate-ai-the-most-use-it-the-most/</guid><pp:caseid>751689</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>Gen Z isn’t afraid of AI, they&#039;re afraid of what they&#039;re becoming</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p><span>47% of respondents under 30 say AI has been more bad than good. Highest of any age group. They use it daily anyway. 79% believe AI makes people lazier</span>. <span>62% think it makes them less sharp&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>They are the canary in the coal mine. It didn't die yet. It just got angry. And nobody in the boardroom noticed.</span></p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>47% of respondents under 30 say AI has been more bad than good. Highest of any age group. They use it daily anyway.</span></p><p><span>They are the canary in the coal mine. It didn't die yet. It just got angry.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>And nobody in the boardroom noticed.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>They're not afraid of AI. They're afraid of what they're becoming</span></h2><p><span>You assume the young ones will sort this out for you. This is the generation that grows up with AI. </span>The only one that has never known a world without it. <span>You think their fluency means comfort. It doesn't.</span></p><ul><li class="ck-list-marker-bold" data-list-item-id="eecb9f5303cd76d1e0bb258b935fc794b"><span><strong>79% believe AI makes people lazier</strong></span></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold" data-list-item-id="e4c9f4d9382bfe059626b262ce688f436"><span><strong>62% think it makes them less sharp&nbsp;</strong></span></li></ul><p><span>They're saying it from inside the tool, after years of daily use.</span></p><p><span>Their fear isn't about robots or redundancy. It's internal. Cognitive. <strong>They feel something being taken from them</strong> and they can't name it precisely.</span></p><p>I'll name it: the craft you build before you know you'll need to defend it.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>The junior years aren’t inefficient. It’s how craft is learned</span></h2><p><span>The tasks AI replaces aren’t just tasks. They are how craft is learned and </span>judgement<span> gets built. Writing the first draft. Doing the research that goes nowhere. That work might feel low-value. It isn’t. It’s repetition. <strong>And repetition is how you learn.</strong></span></p><p><span>A 2025 </span><a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.08872" target="_blank"><span>MIT Media Lab study</span></a><span>* measured this in brain scans. Participants were split into three groups: one used ChatGPT to write essays, one used search engines, one used neither. The <strong>AI group showed the weakest neural connectivity</strong> across all measures. The brain-only group showed the strongest. The gap widened over four months.</span></p><p><span>The detail that is hard to forget: <strong>83.3% of AI users could not quote a single sentence from an essay they had written minutes earlier</strong>. In the brain-only group, that number was 11.1%. They couldn't remember what they just wrote. The researchers call it cognitive debt. Not offloading. Debt. And it accumulates.</span></p><p><span>The research shows <strong>correlation between higher AI use in younger people and lower critical thinking scores.</strong> Not causation.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>A designer who has never composed a layout will struggle to brief a tool or challenge what it returns. </span>But a strategist can build that judgement through different work<span>. There is a craft-dependency.</span></p><p><span>That's why this can't be left to chance.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Nobody decided to stop giving junior people the reps that build craft. It just happened.</span></h2><p><span><strong>→ The decision your board hasn’t made: which groundwork still needs to be done by hand before AI gets started.&nbsp;</strong></span></p><p><span>A copywriter who has never written a brief can't tell you if the AI-generated brief misses the point. A data analyst who has never built a model can't spot when the output looks right but isn't. These judgement problems don’t show up until the moment they matter most.</span></p><p>That decision needs someone with the authority to see it. At board level, or it doesn't happen at all.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>What you can do</span></h2><p><span><strong>→ The craft has to come before the prompt. Decide which craft that is. Then protect it.</strong></span></p><p><span>The canary is still alive. It's waiting for someone in the boardroom to take action. So the organisation builds employees who understand the craft and who can work with AI.</span></p><p>You can start this today. Start with one role. Decide which craft this role must own before AI gets opened.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h3><span>Sources*</span></h3><p><span>New York Times poll via Michelle Goldberg — </span><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/video/opinion/100000010918890/graduating-into-ai-pessimism.html?searchResultPosition=1" target="_blank"><span>Graduating Into A.I. Pessimism</span></a><span>, NYT Opinion May 23 2026&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>Gallup / Walton Family Foundation / GSV Ventures — </span><a href="https://static.waltonfamilyfoundation.org/73/0c/1a0017594d8eb3c0a667766ae914/wff-gallup-gsv-gen-z-2026-ai-report-final.pdf" target="_blank"><span>The AI Paradox: More Exposure, Less Confidence Among Gen Z</span></a><span>, April 2026&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>Wharton / Gallup / Walton Family Foundation — </span><a href="https://hbr.org/2026/01/how-gen-z-uses-gen-ai-and-why-it-worries-them" target="_blank"><span>How Gen Z Uses Gen AI and Why It Worries Them</span></a><span>, HBR January 2026&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>Kosmyna et al. — </span><a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.08872" target="_blank"><span>Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task</span></a><span>, MIT Media Lab, preprint 2025. This is a preprint, not yet peer reviewed. One task, 54 participants, all from Boston universities. Treat it as strong early signal, not settled science. But the direction is consistent with everything else the data is showing.</span></p><p><span>Michael Gerlich — </span><a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006" target="_blank"><span>AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking</span></a><span>, Societies January 2025&nbsp;</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,500+ professionals</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;"><span>→&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><category><![CDATA[AI,strategy]]></category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 21:27:28 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/2ae00996-6450-4ad4-a8f7-cd9fb280da78/500_genzandai.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/2ae00996-6450-4ad4-a8f7-cd9fb280da78/500_genzandai.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/2ae00996-6450-4ad4-a8f7-cd9fb280da78/genzandai.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[GenZ and AI]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>Employees don&#039;t want prompt training, they&#039;re ready to build with AI</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/employees-dont-want-prompt-training-theyre-ready-to-build-with-ai/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/employees-dont-want-prompt-training-theyre-ready-to-build-with-ai/</guid><pp:caseid>745721</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>They moved past the basics while you&#039;re still planning the course</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p><span>Most organizations aren't training their people on AI. 32% have nothing in place. Another 18% say something is in development. 3% </span>aren't sure. About<span> half haven't started. The few that have acted are running prompt courses.</span></p><p><span><strong>→ It's not good enough. Nor is it legal.</strong></span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>The law is not waiting for you to catch up</span></h2><p><span>If your organization uses AI, in any form, for any purpose, you are </span><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-eu-ai-act-created-board-obligations--the-briefing-never-arrived/" target="_blank"><span>required</span></a><span> to ensure that everyone who works with it understands how it functions, where it fails, and what the risks are.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span><strong>Shadow AI is a grey area.</strong> If your organization hasn't provided adequate tools and employees use their own, your obligation may follow them there. If untrained staff cause harm, your organization carries civil liability.</span></p><p><span>This literacy obligation also requires <strong>documented, auditable proof</strong> of who was trained, on what, and when. A defensible record. The regulator can ask for it at any time. If that documentation does not exist, your organization is already non-compliant.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>The problem isn't intent, it's lack of ownership by leadership</span></h2><p><span>Only 13% of organizations have all four AI governance foundations in place: </span>AI roadmap, AI council, generative AI policy and AI ethics policy<span>.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>And 41% describe their AI momentum as inconsistent or siloed.</span></p><p><span>That signals a lack of ownership. <strong>Without ownership, nobody is accountable for building it.</strong> Without that, training has no strategic anchor.</span></p><p><span>The </span><a href="https://www.smarterx.ai" target="_blank"><span>2026 State of AI for Business Report</span></a><span> names it: this is not a knowledge problem or a budget problem. It is a leadership problem.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Your employees </span>ask for more than just prompt training<span>&nbsp;</span></h2><p><span>They have self-educated past the starting point most training programs have not left yet. They are asking for the next level AI training.&nbsp;</span></p><ul><li class="ck-list-marker-bold" data-list-item-id="e359209c673f2ef526b548f27f959948e"><span><strong>58% want to integrate AI into their existing workflows</strong></span></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold" data-list-item-id="ec769cd4840ad5ec9ba51604cd2d8f50c"><span><strong>51% want to use AI agents</strong></span></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold" data-list-item-id="eb52b44c1266bcebf8818c3404351a135"><span><strong>45% want to build no-code tools</strong></span><br><br><span><strong>Prompting? 15%</strong></span></li></ul><p><span>The training they want doesn’t exist in most organizations.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>A prompt course is not AI literacy</h2><p><span>Your people already named part of it. Workflows. Agents. No-code tools. Real AI literacy goes further:</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span><strong>Working with AI structrally</strong>&nbsp;</span><br>Give AI clear, structured instructions. Build the workflows and agents that follow<span>.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>→ Once people can do this, </span>automation is the next step<span>.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span><strong>Bias and ethics: the lines you cannot see</strong>&nbsp;</span><br>Every AI system learned from human data and carries human bias<span>. Your hiring tool may already be filtering out candidates in ways nobody has reviewed. Your performance system may be reinforcing patterns nobody chose.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>→ You will not see it, but the bias is there.&nbsp;</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span><strong>Data safety: know what goes where</strong>&nbsp;</span><br><span>Internal tools, such as Copilot, keep your data inside your walls. External tools</span>, &nbsp;such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, <span>may use what you give them. Customer data. Financial projections. Legal documents.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>→ Most employees do not know the difference.&nbsp;</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>This one is on you</h2><p><span>Your people have moved on. The law has moved in. Your training program is the only thing standing still.</span></p><p><span><strong>→ That is not a technology problem. It is a leadership problem. Yours.</strong></span></p><p><span>Fix it.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h3><span>Sources</span></h3><p><a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689" target="_blank"><span>EU AI Act</span></a><br><a href="https://www.smarterx.ai" target="_blank"><span>2026 State of AI for Business Report, SmarterX</span></a><br><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-eu-ai-act-created-board-obligations--the-briefing-never-arrived/" target="_blank"><span>The EU AI Act created board obligations — the briefing just never arrived</span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,500+ professionals</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;"><span>→&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p>]]></description><category><![CDATA[AI,strategy]]></category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 20:08:00 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/9bf2a3d0-770e-4b82-963a-6f94a2f78ca1/500_ailiteracytraining.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/9bf2a3d0-770e-4b82-963a-6f94a2f78ca1/500_ailiteracytraining.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/9bf2a3d0-770e-4b82-963a-6f94a2f78ca1/ailiteracytraining.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[AI literacy training]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>The AI tax almost nobody is talking about</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-ai-tax-nobodys-talking-about/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-ai-tax-nobodys-talking-about/</guid><pp:caseid>743323</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>AI saves the hours. Rework takes them back. And a prompt course won&#039;t fix it.</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>For every 10 hours AI saves your team, about 4 go straight back. Into rework. Into corrections. Into output that looked finished but wasn't. That's the AI tax.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>→ It's unintentional, it's unnoticed, and it's taking away the gains you thought you had. And nobody at the top is owning it.&nbsp;</strong></p><p>The fix isn't a prompt course. It's teaching people to use AI as a thinking tool: to pressure-test an idea before they build it, not just execute faster.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>The net gain is 40% smaller than you think</h2><p>For every 10 hours of productivity gained, the net gain is closer to 6. Rework, clarification, and correction take back roughly 4 of every 10 hours gained. And that's the optimistic version — it doesn't count the output that lowered the quality bar without anyone noticing.</p><p><strong>→ The AI tax doesn't show up on any report. That doesn't make it less real.</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>AI is designed to agree with you</h2><p>This is the part most AI training skips. AI doesn't push back. It doesn't tell you the question is wrong or the brief is vague or the assumption underneath is broken. AI gives you what you asked for, shaped to sound confident.</p><p>If <strong>your people aren't trained to interrogate that output</strong> — to treat it as a first draft, not a final answer — they'll take the easiest route every time.&nbsp;</p><p>Not because they're lazy. Because AI makes it easy to stop too soon. That's not a prompt problem. It's a thinking problem.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Polished is not the same as finished</h2><p>Work gets done. AI makes it look finished. It gets handed over.</p><p>The person receiving it has two options. <strong>Check it, catch the problem, and fix it. That's the AI tax,</strong> paid in hours nobody planned for. Or don't check it at all — because it looks fine. Miss it. And the quality bar quietly shifts.</p><p>Nobody is cutting corners on purpose. But AI produces output that looks right. If you don't challenge it, or you're too busy to, you think you're done.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Your team isn't experiencing what you are</h2><p>Leadership uses AI for thinking. Employees use it for production. That's where the flaws surface and the rework lands.&nbsp;</p><p>Employees report:</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e0d0955f62d2cee46f59e72d7362b5673">40% say AI saves them no time at all</li><li data-list-item-id="e7efbc6c57679cd1e89529ea7ef97f8dd">27% say less than 2 hours a week</li><li data-list-item-id="ee93cf23d6d2254f474a1529679414424">20% say 2 to 4 hours per week</li></ul><p>C-suite reports:</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e646f21a480485fdd4954763559759b9a">33% say AI saves 4 to 8 hours per week</li><li data-list-item-id="e2bcf2a02f7d2357ff99f483f479931b0">24% say 8 to 12 hours</li><li data-list-item-id="e73ebd48bc127563fa85a2efcc674111f">19% say more than 12 hours</li></ul><p>On top of that, 68% of employees feel anxious or overwhelmed by AI. In the C-suite that drops to 26%.</p><p>They aren’t experiencing the same tool. And that gap is where the AI tax lives.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>A prompt course fixes the wrong problem</h2><p>The fix has two parts.&nbsp;</p><p>Train people to think. <strong>Teach them the habit of challenging AI output</strong> — treating it as a first draft, not a final answer. This isn't built in a prompt course. It's built into how work gets done.</p><p>And <strong>decide in advance what the freed hours are for</strong>. Not for more output, but for doing the work only your people can do.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Morgan Stanley didn't save time. They invested it</h2><p>Right now, the hours your team isn't losing to rework are probably going back into the same grind. More tasks. More output. Faster, but not better.</p><p>Morgan Stanley made a different decision. When they gave advisors AI, the goal wasn't speed. It was reallocation. <strong>Get the work off their plates so they could do what AI can't:</strong> be in the room with the client.</p><p>The result wasn't more output. It was <strong>$64 billion in net new assets</strong>. The return wasn't in hours saved. It was in what those hours became — because someone at the top decided in advance what to do with them.</p><p>Almost no organization decides upfront where to invest the hours saved.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Nobody at the top is owning this</h2><p>Both parts of the fix require the same thing. Someone at the top who owns the decision.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>→ The AI tax exists because that decision hasn't been made.</strong></p><p>Stop counting the hours saved. Start deciding what they're for.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Sources: <a href="https://www.wsj.com/lifestyle/workplace/ceos-say-ai-is-making-work-more-efficient-employees-tell-a-different-story-6613ce9d" target="_blank">WSJ</a>, &nbsp;<a href="https://www.workday.com/en-us/perspectives/ai/ai-friction-into-flow.html" target="_blank">Workday</a>, <a href="https://www.sectionai.com/ai/the-ai-proficiency-report" target="_blank">Section AI</a>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,500+ professionals</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;"><span>→&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p>]]></description><category><![CDATA[AI,strategy]]></category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 10:25:00 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/211d7b2f-d8a2-4736-b999-292554d58ea2/500_square.png?24815" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/211d7b2f-d8a2-4736-b999-292554d58ea2/500_square.png?24815</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/211d7b2f-d8a2-4736-b999-292554d58ea2/square.png?24815</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[AI tax]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>The EU AI Act created board obligations — the briefing just never arrived</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-eu-ai-act-created-board-obligations--the-briefing-never-arrived/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-eu-ai-act-created-board-obligations--the-briefing-never-arrived/</guid><pp:caseid>744509</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>Five things every board needs to understand, without the legal fog</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>Most boards treated AI as a technology decision. Handed it to IT. Flagged it for legal. Put it on next year's agenda and moved on. That felt responsible. It isn’t. </p><p><strong>The EU AI Act makes AI a board responsibility.</strong> Not a department responsibility. Not a vendor responsibility. Yours. Since February 2025. </p><p>This piece draws on the <a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EU AI Act</a> and on copyright legislation. Both are in effect. Both are moving. Sources at the bottom.</p><p> </p><p>Here is what every board needs to know.</p><p> </p><p> </p><h2>1. Training your people is a legal obligation</h2><p>This is not something to include in next year's planning cycle. It has been law since February 2025.</p><p><strong>→ If your organization uses AI, in any form, for any purpose, you are required to ensure that everyone who works with it understands how it functions, where it fails, and what the risks are. </strong></p><p>And yes, that probably includes employees using their personal ChatGPT account to write a report or analyse a document. The tool is personal. The obligation is not.</p><p>The regulator can ask for documentation of who was trained, on what, and when. If that documentation does not exist, your organization is already non-compliant.</p><p>Later in this piece, I describe what your board and people actually need to learn. </p><p> </p><p> </p><h2>2. Your vendor contract doesn't cover you</h2><p>OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, and the AI feature quietly built into your CRM, your HR platform, your marketing software. They all have their own legal obligations as the organizations that build these tools. You have yours as the organization that uses them. Those are not the same. One does not cover the other.</p><p><strong>→ When something goes wrong, the regulator comes to you. Not to your vendor.</strong></p><p>There is a second trap most boards do not see. The moment your IT team adapts a system, trains it on your data, or uses it outside its original purpose, you are no longer just a user. You become legally the organization that built it. With all the obligations that come with that.</p><p>Your vendor signed a contract. You signed up for the liability.</p><p> </p><p> </p><h2>3. Your HR tools are probably high-risk</h2><p>The recruitment software that screens applications before your HR manager sees them. The system that supports performance reviews. The tool that tracks productivity or predicts absence. The EU AI Act classifies all of these as high-risk by default.</p><p><strong>→ High-risk does not mean illegal. It means you have strict obligations: human oversight, logging, transparency, and a formal assessment of the impact on people's rights, before you use it.</strong></p><p>Some tools cross a different line entirely. Lie detection in job interviews. Emotion recognition software on the work floor. Those are not high-risk. They are forbidden. Before you roll out any AI system that touches your people, you are required to involve them. Employees have the right to know. You do not get to decide that on their behalf.</p><p> </p><p> </p><h2>4. If you use AI, you have to say so</h2><p>Your customers have the right to know when they are talking to a machine. The EU AI Act makes it your obligation to tell them.</p><p>Any customer-facing chatbot must identify itself as AI. Deepfakes must be visibly marked. Fully AI-generated content must be labeled. AI-assisted content is a grey area. When in doubt, disclose.</p><p><strong>→ These obligations apply from August 2026. For some, they apply already.</strong></p><p>This is not a legal footnote. It hits brand trust, customer relationships, and liability at the same time. And when your organization gets it wrong, you do not get to manage that story. The regulator tells it.</p><p> </p><p> </p><h2>5. What your AI writes, anyone can copy</h2><p>Pure AI output has no copyright protection. That proposal. That report. That campaign. If a human did not meaningfully shape it, it is not yours. Anyone can take it, use it, publish it. You have no legal claim.</p><p>There is a second risk most boards do not see coming. If your AI tool trained on someone else's copyrighted work and your output looks too similar, you can be sued for infringement. Even though you did not write a word of it.</p><p><strong>→ Most organizations are producing work they think they own but legally cannot protect.</strong></p><p>For extensive reports, make sure a human shaped the final output, save the chats, and name that person as the responsible author.</p><p>A note on this point: copyright sits outside the EU AI Act. It is governed by separate legislation. It belongs in this piece because it is a direct consequence of how most organizations use AI today.</p><p> </p><p> </p><h2>The cost of getting this wrong</h2><p>The fines are bigger than GDPR. Up to <strong>€ 35 million or 7% of global annual turnover</strong>, whichever is higher. They add to any fines for your GDPR exposure. One incident, two regulators, two bills.</p><p>The full enforcement machinery is still being built. National authorities are being set up and harmonized standards are not yet final. But the <strong>fines regime has been active since August 2025</strong>. The law is not waiting for governments to catch up.</p><p><strong>Roll out AI without proper process and your own people can stop you</strong>.<strong> </strong>Employees have the right to formally object to AI systems that affect their work. One complaint to the regulator is enough to trigger an investigation. If your company has more than 50 employees, your Works Council has the legal right to block the deployment entirely, after you have paid for it and announced it.</p><p><strong>When something goes wrong, your customers and employees will not hear it from you first. </strong>Transparency obligations mean the regulator tells the story. You do not get to manage that narrative.</p><p> </p><p>  </p><h2>Where to start: being compliant</h2><p>Awareness is not compliance. Knowing the risks is not the same as managing them.</p><ul><li>Start here. <strong>Make a list of every AI tool your organization uses</strong>. Not what IT approved. What people actually use. ChatGPT on personal accounts. The AI feature inside your CRM. The recruitment software your HR team bought last year. Every tool.<br /> </li><li><strong>For each one, ask three questions</strong>. Does it make decisions about people? Does it process personal or confidential data? Was it ever adapted or fine-tuned for your specific needs? The answers tell you where your risk sits.<br /> </li><li><strong>Then go to your legal team,</strong> not with "are we compliant?" but with "here are our tools, here is what they do, what do we need to put in place?" That is a conversation legal can actually work with.</li></ul><p> </p><p><strong>That is step zero. Most boards have not taken it yet.</strong> </p><p> </p><p> </p><h2>Where to start: the training question</h2><p>The legal obligation to train your people is covered in point one. Three things your board and people need to be trained on.</p><ul><li><strong>Learn to talk to machines</strong><br />This is not about writing a better prompt. It is about understanding how to give AI clear, structured instructions. <br /><br />And how to break your own work processes into steps that AI can actually execute. Once you can do that, agents and automation follow naturally. Not as a technology project. As a logical next step.<br /> </li><li><strong>Bias and ethics, the lines you cannot see</strong><br />Bias is not hypothetical. It’s happening in tools organizations are already using. Every AI system learned from human data. Which means every AI system carries human bias. You will not see it. Your employees will not flag it. <br /><br />But when your hiring tool quietly filters out women, or your customer model disadvantages certain postcodes, you are responsible. <br /><br />Ethics sits right next to it. Digital manipulation. Exclusion by algorithm. Personalization that exploits rather than serves. <br /> </li><li><strong>Data safety: know what goes where</strong><br />There is a fundamental difference between using Copilot inside your Microsoft environment and using ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini. Internal tools keep your data inside your walls. External tools may use what you give them. Customer data. Financial projections. Legal documents. <br /><br />Most employees do not know the difference. Most boards have not set a policy.</li></ul><p> </p><p>This is trainable. <strong>Not in a one-day workshop. In a structured program</strong> that builds understanding for those who works with AI every day. </p><p> </p><p>→ If you want to know what both starting points look like for your organization, get in touch.</p><p> </p><p> </p><h2>Sources and notes</h2><p>This piece draws on two legal frameworks: the <a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EU AI Act</a> and copyright legislation. For other regions, different rules may apply.</p><p>What I do is translate the legal parts that matter to the board. I am not a lawyer. For anything specific to your organization, talk to your legal department.</p><p>One more thing. <strong>The law is already in effect,</strong> parts of it since February 2025. And it keeps moving. The Digital Omnibus agreement of May 2026 is the most recent example: a significant shift in deadlines that happened with little public notice. </p><p>By the time most organizations hear about a change, it has already taken effect. <strong>A yearly legal update is not enough. </strong><span>This needs to be on your agenda throughout the year.</span></p><p> </p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:500px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/55307665-9839-481a-8934-c7fa7d65c448/1920_eu_ai_act_timeline.png?x=1778612764570" alt="eu_ai_act_timeline" width="500" /></p><p> </p><p> </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,750+ professionals</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference. </span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"><span>→ </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;"> </p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p><hr style="text-align:left;" /><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"> </p>]]></description><category><![CDATA[AI,stategy,B2B,legal]]></category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:14:00 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/b8270891-ca8e-466c-ab4d-a05eb4a0b404/500_euaiactexplained.png?11540" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/b8270891-ca8e-466c-ab4d-a05eb4a0b404/500_euaiactexplained.png?11540</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/b8270891-ca8e-466c-ab4d-a05eb4a0b404/euaiactexplained.png?11540</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[EU AI ACT explained]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>AI-generated or having an em dash is not a quality signal</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/ai-generated-is-not-a-quality-signal/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/ai-generated-is-not-a-quality-signal/</guid><pp:caseid>744487</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>Just because something looks low effort doesn’t mean it’s low quality</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>Someone tells you it's AI-generated. You've already decided: low effort, low quality. And you haven't read a word yet.</p><p>You're not entirely wrong. A lot of AI content is bad.</p><p>But you're wrong about why.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>You see the 2 minutes of AI, not the 2 hours of preperation</h2><p><span style="text-align:start;">Before AI, the effort was in the writing. First ugly drafts. Countless revisions. Tuning and tweaking over time. You saw the labor because it looked like labor.</span></p><p><span><strong>→ Now all the work happens before a single word is written.&nbsp;</strong></span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">The AI configuration. The context-loading. Challenging the angle. It's all in the brief that took two hours to write. All so AI creates the output in two minutes.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">Because you can't see any of that prework, you assume it isn't there.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>AI doesn't create mediocrity; people do</h2><p><span>AI doesn't create mediocrity. People do.</span></p><p><span>AI doesn't produce bad content. People without craft do. They always have. Now they're just faster.</span></p><p><span><strong>→ The strong writer who can now produce strong content in a few minutes hasn't eliminated the work. They've moved it upstream.</strong></span></p><p><span>From writing into preparation and thinking. Learning how to direct machines effectively. Configuring their AI so the output reflects their standards and voice. Writing the brief. Making decisions before a single word is generated.</span></p><p><span>All of that effort is invisible to you. That's why the result looks effortless.</span></p><p><span>Craftsmanship isn’t overhead, it’s your quality control.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>AI didn't lower the bar, you did</h2><p>The real quality signal is not whether it's AI. Stop reading AI-generated content like it's evidence.&nbsp;</p><p>Read it as if you didn't know how it was made.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>About my confessions</span></h2><p>More about me and my confessions. Why I hold content to a higher standard. And why I write what most people in this industry won't say out loud.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>I'm a&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/fleurwillemijn/" target="_blank"><span>content strategist</span></a><span>&nbsp;with a university background in marketing, media, sociology, and psychology. </span>I've worked in this industry for 25+ years<span> and for 50+ global brands and agencies.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>I've seen a lot. Made many mistakes. Learned even more.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Now, I share all this to inspire everyone working in marketing and communication to </span>more accountable work<span>. There's already too much crappy content out there; n</span>o need to add to it.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p style="margin-left:0px;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,500+ professionals</span></h2><p>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference.&nbsp;</p><p>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;"><span>→&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p style="margin-left:0px;">&nbsp;</p>]]></description><category><![CDATA[confessions,strategy,AI]]></category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 09:04:00 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/addf1323-1163-45a6-ab77-47fb185b0c39/500_aiandquality.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/addf1323-1163-45a6-ab77-47fb185b0c39/500_aiandquality.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/addf1323-1163-45a6-ab77-47fb185b0c39/aiandquality.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[AI and quality]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>The 5-to-7 rule for content that sticks</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/master-the-rule-of-5-7-make-your-content-stick/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/master-the-rule-of-5-7-make-your-content-stick/</guid><pp:caseid>605080</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>You don&#039;t need more content. You need to use what you have.</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>The biggest lie in the content industry is that you need more and new content. You paid for it once. You can use it five times. Very few brands do.</p><p><span><strong>→ You need to see something 5 to 7 times before you remember it. Reuse and repeat your content a few times.&nbsp;</strong></span></p><p>Rule of thumb: when it starts to feel repetitive and annoying to you, others are just beginning to notice. You need to repeat yourself over and over again to get your message across.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Understand the 5 to 7 rule in memory retention</span></h2><p>Research in advertising and educational psychology puts the number at five to seven exposures before information moves from short-term to long-term memory. That's the rule. Work with it.</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e0e9c81b67f5d972c36a3ed299852b238"><span>Every time we see information, our brain <strong>strengthens the neural pathway connected to that data</strong>. More exposure means a stronger pathway.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e163dfbeb880aeec5abc549f4484e5725"><span>It's also about <strong>repetition over time that creates effectiveness</strong>. There needs to be an interval between the exposures to allow our brain to refresh and reinforce the memory.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e7f9d4f40871d75909168a24e55036a0b"><span>To boost effectiveness, it’s recommended to <strong>engage with the information actively</strong>. For content, that means you need to provoke, stand out, and be noticeable. Don’t blend in and become vanilla.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="efc5577d9ce1aae8d897322d0b1f16507"><span>The <strong>more emotional the connection, the better the information is remembered</strong>.</span></li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span><strong>→ Not everyone has seen your content the first time you publish. On LinkedIn, about a maximum of 10% of your followers see your content, if you're lucky.&nbsp;</strong></span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Strategy 1. Republish: extend the lifespan</span></h2><p><span>Creating good content is f*cking expensive, so why not re-use what you already have?</span></p><p><span>First, you audit your content and identify what resonates and can be repeated. &nbsp;Next, </span><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/good-content-creates-impact-every-time-recycle-and-reuse/" target="_blank"><span>refresh and update the content</span></a><span> and reshuffle the structure if needed, before you republish and repost on social.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>→ How I did this with this article</strong><br>I refresh the data, tighten the copy, and update examples before republishing, <span>as this is one of my best-read pages.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>The original publication was in November 2023. It was updated and republished in January, June, and September 2024, in January, April, July and September 2025, and again in May 2026.&nbsp;</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Strategy 2. Repurposing: create something new with the same content</span></h2><p><span>You can do this in two ways.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>In a <strong>different format</strong>. For example, creating a video or infographic out of a blog post or an infographic. Combine multiple blogs into a whitepaper. Alternatively, you can create a blog post from an interview.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>Or <strong>create a new edit</strong> in the same format. Not every piece of content is usable for this strategy, yet if you have one, use it.</span></p><p><span><strong>How to create a new edit, leading by example</strong></span><br><span>Let's take these three pages:</span></p><ul><li data-list-item-id="ed8ef6627faece6205d0fa66696825f6d"><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/improve-your-prompts-with-these-4-free-ai-courses/" target="_blank"><span>Improve your prompts with these 4 free AI courses.</span></a><span> The best AI and ChatGPT training for marketing and content (publication 31 October)</span></li><li data-list-item-id="ee62e85e32db424119d60d93de2607f03"><span>‘The 4 best free AI courses for marketing and content.’ &nbsp;(this page is offline due being outdated)</span></li><li data-list-item-id="e18d630a83c6bca13ca99a7e52ef4bb91"><span>’The 15 best tips to master prompt engineering for marketing and content.’ (this page is offline due being outdated)</span></li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span>All three have the same content blocks: the list of my recommended four best and free AI courses, an overview of how to master your prompt tips and tricks, and how I came to this selection. These are my content LEGO bricks.</span></p><p><span><strong>→ By playing with the order or the content LEGO blocks, and writing a new header and subheader, each page has its own key message and learning, while I (re)use the same content.</strong></span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><table><tr><td style="vertical-align:top;"><p style="text-align:right;"><span style="color:#bdc3c7;">Header</span></p></td><td style="vertical-align:top;"><span><strong>Improve your prompts with these 4 free AI courses</strong></span></td><td style="vertical-align:top;"><span><strong>The 4 best free AI courses for marketing and content</strong></span></td><td style="vertical-align:top;"><span><strong>The 15 best tips to master prompt engineering for marketing and content</strong></span></td></tr><tr><td style="vertical-align:top;"><p style="text-align:right;"><span style="color:#bdc3c7;">Subheader</span></p></td><td style="vertical-align:top;"><span>The best AI and ChatGPT training for marketing and content</span></td><td style="vertical-align:top;"><span>My selection so you can cut some corners and benefit from ChatGPT</span></td><td style="vertical-align:top;"><span>All you need to know, plus the 4 best free AI courses for you</span></td></tr><tr><td style="vertical-align:top;"><p style="text-align:right;"><span style="color:#bdc3c7;">Message</span></p></td><td style="vertical-align:top;">→ Improve your prompts by completing these four courses</td><td style="vertical-align:top;">→ Check out these four courses&nbsp;</td><td style="vertical-align:top;">→ 15 Tips on how to improve your prompts</td></tr><tr><td style="vertical-align:top;"><p style="text-align:right;"><span style="color:#bdc3c7;">1.</span></p></td><td style="vertical-align:top;"><span>• Four best and free AI courses with the details</span></td><td style="vertical-align:top;">• My selection process</td><td style="vertical-align:top;"><span>• How to master your prompt</span></td></tr><tr><td style="vertical-align:top;"><p style="text-align:right;"><span style="color:#bdc3c7;">2.</span></p></td><td style="vertical-align:top;"><span>•&nbsp;How to master your prompt</span></td><td style="vertical-align:top;"><span>•&nbsp;Four best and free AI courses with the details</span></td><td style="vertical-align:top;"><span>• Four best and free AI courses with the details</span></td></tr><tr><td style="vertical-align:top;"><p style="text-align:right;"><span style="color:#bdc3c7;">3.&nbsp;</span></p></td><td style="vertical-align:top;">•&nbsp;My selection process</td><td style="vertical-align:top;"><span>•&nbsp;How to master your prompt</span></td><td style="vertical-align:top;">•&nbsp;My selection process</td></tr></table><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>AI is a tool, &nbsp;not a replacement</h2><p>AI can't replace your knowledge, expertise and judgment. Two tips:</p><ol><li data-list-item-id="ef5fe0872a93a8e3f7dd9224c447ea298"><strong>You do the thinking, AI does the execution</strong>. Don't ask AI just to make a new edit of your content; give very specific and detailed instructions about what you want AI to update or change.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e96fdb835f50d821e9ad151b3147bc583"><strong>Ask AI to give suggestions,</strong> not a rewrite. You'll review faster and keep more of your own thinking. How to do this: “<i>Can you analyze and give me suggestions to rewrite this</i>”.&nbsp;</li></ol><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>The essential tips for content repetition</h2><ul><li data-list-item-id="e241622ba8efc856e040740dd7808acbe"><span><strong>Have some time in between publications</strong></span><br>Repurposing: three weeks. <span>R</span>epublishing: wait three months.</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e189509d9d74a60f85b87d1bcd3a9f474"><strong>Reshuffle the structure</strong><br>Same content blocks, new order. Write a new header and subheader. The reader gets a different entry point into the same material. That's a new edit, not a copy-paste.</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="ea543440ab9a55d15d3db9d5a2b7168ad"><span><strong>New visuals</strong></span><br><span>Make it look like new. </span>T<span>he most important thing is the first impression, which is visual. Always check and adjust the visual whether it’s republished or reposted.&nbsp;</span></li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="edc4100cb7a5b7de8e905180eea2631b5"><span><strong>Add a disclaimer</strong></span><br><span>Be upfront and give clarity about what you’re doing. Nothing is as annoying as a brand that presents content as brand new, and you’re very sure you’ve seen the content before. Besides, does anybody ever read the disclaimer?&nbsp;</span></li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>The bottom line</h2><p>Good content is expensive to make. Most brands publish it once and move on. That's not a strategy. That's waste.</p><p>On LinkedIn, 10% of your followers see your content on a good day. The other 90% never got the chance. Republish. Repurpose. Repeat.</p><p>The content you already have is enough. Use it.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span><strong>Join 2,500+ professionals</strong></span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;"><span>→&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Sources</span></h2><p><span>Krugman, Herbert E. "Why Three Exposures May Be Enough." Journal of Advertising Research 12.6 (1972).</span></p><p><span>Pimsleur, Paul. "A Memory Schedule." The Modern Language Journal 51.2 (1967): 73-75.</span></p><p><span>Ebbinghaus, Hermann. "Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology." Annals of neurosciences 20.4 (2013): 155.</span></p><p><span>Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2016). An unexpected sequence of events: Mismatch detection in the human hippocampus. </span><i><span>PLOS Biology, 14</span></i><span>(12), e1002588.</span></p><p><span>Smolen, P., Zhang, Y., & Byrne, J. H. (2018). The right time to learn: mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning. </span><i><span>Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17</span></i><span>(2), 77-88.</span></p><p><span>Antony, J. W., Gobel, E. W., O’Hare, J. K., Reber, P. J., & Paller, K. A. (2015). Cued memory reactivation during sleep influences skill learning. </span><i><span>Nature Neuroscience, 18</span></i><span>(8), 1114-1116.</span></p><p><span>Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. </span><i><span>Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15</span></i><span>(1), 20-27.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><category><![CDATA[strategy,B2B,how to,AI]]></category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 05:58:54 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/420b111e-979d-4c73-8186-e3b8934c4eb5/500_repeatyourcontent.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/420b111e-979d-4c73-8186-e3b8934c4eb5/500_repeatyourcontent.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/420b111e-979d-4c73-8186-e3b8934c4eb5/repeatyourcontent.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[repeat your content]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>The em dash is not a red flag; it’s a beat that a comma can’t land</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-em-dash-is-not-a-red-flag-its-a-beat-that-a-comma-cant-land/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-em-dash-is-not-a-red-flag-its-a-beat-that-a-comma-cant-land/</guid><pp:caseid>743198</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>Don&#039;t judge copy by an em dash</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p><span>Scanning copy for em dashes like they're evidence of AI? Let's be honest about what that is. It's lazy. The same kind of lazy as writers who let AI write for them without thinking. You're just doing it from the other side of the page.</span></p><p><span>Here's what happens. Before AI, I barely used em dashes. They just weren't on my radar. I'd use a comma where an em dash would have been useful — without knowing it.</span></p><p><span>Then I started working with AI and noticed: it uses them. Consistently, cleanly, correctly. A soft stop before a pivot. A way to pull your eye to what matters. A beat that a comma can't quite land.</span></p><p><span>That's brilliant. So I learned from it. Made a keyboard shortcut for the em dash. That's what you do when something earns its place.</span></p><p><span>The writers not using em dashes to avoid suspicion? They're letting AI dictate their style.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Don't judge copy by an em dash</span></h2><p><span>Overuse is the signal. Five em dashes in three paragraphs, none of them earning their place. That's automation, not writing.</span></p><p><span>A few, used with intent? That's a writer paying attention. Caring and crafting. Making choices. Knowing when to stop, pivot, and let the point land.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>The real problem is you</span></h2><p><span>When punctuation becomes your fastest shortcut to a verdict, that's not detection. That's the loss of critical reading. You've replaced the ability to recognize craft with the ability to spot patterns.</span></p><p><span>That's the real problem. Not the em dash.</span></p><p><span>Read the writing. Not the punctuation.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>About my confessions</span></h2><p>More about me and my confessions. Why I hold content to a higher standard. And why I write what most people in this industry won't say out loud.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>I'm a&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/fleurwillemijn/" target="_blank"><span>content strategist</span></a><span>&nbsp;with a university background in marketing, media, sociology, and psychology. </span>I've worked in this industry for 25+ years<span> and for 50+ global brands and agencies.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>I've seen a lot. Made many mistakes. Learned even more.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Now, I share all this to inspire everyone working in marketing and communication to </span>more accountable work<span>. There's already too much crappy content out there; n</span>o need to add to it.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p style="margin-left:0px;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,500+ professionals</span></h2><p>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference.&nbsp;</p><p>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;"><span>→&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p style="margin-left:0px;">&nbsp;</p>]]></description><category><![CDATA[confessions,strategy,AI]]></category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 08:51:45 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/31d7dcd3-0e3e-4a07-939d-c2a003f6e77d/500_emdashasairedflag.png?18362" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/31d7dcd3-0e3e-4a07-939d-c2a003f6e77d/500_emdashasairedflag.png?18362</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/31d7dcd3-0e3e-4a07-939d-c2a003f6e77d/emdashasairedflag.png?18362</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[em dash as AI red flag]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>How to capture your tone of voice for AI</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/how-to-create-your-tone-of-voice-for-ai-and-save-lots-of-time-and-frustration/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/how-to-create-your-tone-of-voice-for-ai-and-save-lots-of-time-and-frustration/</guid><pp:caseid>729504</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>Sounding unmistakably like yourself is the point</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p name="f5ea">Authenticity is dead. Not the concept,  the word. It’s used too many times, by too many brands. Now it means nothing. What you need is harder to fake and more useful. → Identity. 7 steps and 15 minutes is all it takes.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p name="f5ea">Authenticity is dead. Not the concept,  the word. It’s used too many times, by too many brands. Now it means nothing. What you need is harder to fake and more useful.&nbsp;</p><p name="f5ea"><strong>→ Identity</strong></p><p name="5877">In 7 steps and 15 minutes, you’ll have instructions and reusable prompt to paste into Claude, Copilot, or any AI tool you use. After that, your AI stops defaulting to generic and starts sounding like you.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Why it&nbsp;matters&nbsp;</h2><p name="0210">Your AI defaults to the average of everything. That average sounds like everyone else. Feed your AI your identity and the output changes  — not slightly, but recognizably.&nbsp;</p><p name="0210"><strong>→ The time you save is the side effect. Sounding unmistakably like yourself is the point.</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Step 1. Collect</span></h2><p><span>Collect examples of copy that sounds like you. It can be an email, a piece you’ve written, or even your LinkedIn bio; that’s how I do this when creating a tone of voice for C-suite ghostwriting.</span></p><p><span>I’d say 3 x 200 words minimum and 500 words maximum.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>You have to give AI something to work with.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Step 2. Use this prompt</span></h2><p><span>Use the prompt below. It’s an oldy from the early days of AI, but it still works. Don’t fix a prompt that isn’t broken and steal from the best.</span></p><p><span>The [examples] placeholder is where you copy and paste what you collected in step 1.&nbsp;</span><br><br>’<i>You are a tone of voice analyst. Your job is to study the writing examples below and produce a precise, detailed analysis that another writer could use to replicate this style accurately.</i></p><p><i>What to analyse:</i> <i>- Word choice: formal or informal, simple or complex, technical or plain</i> <i>- Sentence structure: length, variation, rhythm</i> <i>- How the author addresses the reader: direct, warm, authoritative, conversational</i> <i>- What the writing does not do — what it avoids is as revealing as what it uses</i></p><p>Examples: [examples]</p><p><i>After your analysis, write a clear style briefing. It should cover everything a writer needs to reproduce this voice: the patterns, the tone, the rhythm, and the boundaries. Be specific. Generic observations like 'clear and engaging' are not useful. Name what is actually distinctive about this voice and why it works.’</i></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Step 3. Go to AI</span></h2><p><span>Go to your AI and paste the prompt from step 2, including the examples from step 1.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Step 4. Analyse the response</span></h2><p><span>Do you like what you read? Great.</span></p><p><span>If not, tweak until it sounds like you.</span></p><p><span>My tip. <strong>Don’t go overboard and be too detailed or too specific.</strong> </span>AI has a working memory, not an infinite brain. <span>Being meticulous is excellent, but you can push it too far, and AI gets an error and it becomes worse instead of better.&nbsp;</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Step 5. Add details</span></h2><p><span>This can be contrary to what I mentioned above, but by not overloading AI at the beginning, you leave room to add details now.</span></p><p><span>This list is yours to build, and can be details like</span></p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e804771ad934569e3bd7bc867b3745239"><span>‘</span><i><span>Write in B1 language without dumbing it down, and keep the jargon where it’s absolutely needed.’</span></i><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e873d216fa1bbae6e26613868f7cc6b07"><span>‘</span><i><span>Use the writing for busy readers philosophy to keep the content clean, crisp, and sharp.’</span></i><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e1af4d64a77803668e2dcb65ff9e8b459"><span>‘</span><i><span>Vary between longer and shorter sentences. Keep the copy conversational, fluid, and natural as if you’re speaking to a business friend.’</span></i><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="ef45d194c72e3cacd4003e7ce801c8518"><i><span>‘Put yourself in the users’ shoes, reason from their perspective, ‘what’s in it for me', ‘why should I care’</span></i><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e6edc2e9efa849a77895d8d525d4b5622"><span>And of course, the ‘</span><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/the-em-dash-is-not-a-red-flag-its-a-beat-that-a-comma-cant-land/" target="_blank"><i><span>Don’t over use em dashes’</span></i></a><span>.</span></li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span>→ My advice: stick to 3 to 5 details. Again, if you list too many details, it becomes too complicated, causing AI-brain freeze and the output becomes worse instead of better.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Step 6. Analyse again</span></h2><p><span>Ask AI to give you the complete tone of voice analysis: ‘</span><i><span>Can you give me the final result?’</span></i></p><p><span>Check it. Do you like it? Great, continue to step 7.</span></p><p><span>Don’t like it? Go back to step 5 or even to step 1, maybe you’ve selected the wrong examples.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Step 7. Ask AI to make your prompt or instructions</span></h2><p><span>Last step in the process. Now you ask AI to create a prompt or an instruction you can use in the settings of your AI tool.</span></p><p><i>'Based on this analysis, write a tone of voice instruction I can save and reuse.' or ‘Can you turn this analysis into a tone of voice instruction I can paste into your settings?’</i></p><p>Then use it as a prompt or paste it in one of these places:&nbsp;</p><ul><li data-list-item-id="e5278ae3af6a46e809bb2de6b9e85ee6d">Claude: Settings → Profile → Personal preferences</li><li data-list-item-id="ea02affcc69058c20756518630fba2c62">Copilot: Microsoft 365 Copilot prompt box, pinned as a custom instruction</li><li data-list-item-id="ecf7035fefa08fa461e5cefb0e3242129">ChatGPT: Settings → Personalisation → Custom instructions</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Save a copy in your notes. You'll want it when you switch tools or onboard someone new.</p><p>See below what my tone of voice and the prompt look like.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Explained by example, my tone of voice</span></h2><p><span>This is the result when I let AI define my personality.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span><strong>My result of step 4</strong></span></p><ul><li data-list-item-id="ec49139c03edf0b75dcabf48c0b79e0c6"><span><strong>Direct and Candid</strong>:&nbsp;The author speaks directly to the audience, without sugarcoating the message. Phrases such as "fcking expensive," "Cutting corners and wanting it cheap hurts my brand and content heart," and "Remember, sht in is sh*t out" are clear indicators of this straightforward approach.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e7c689ecc3755d130fdcb00874ed55a7d"><span><strong>Knowledgeable and Authoritative</strong>:&nbsp;The author displays a deep understanding of the topic and offers clear guidance. Statements such as "These are the ballpark numbers" and "The ballpark split is minimal, 40% - 60%" exemplify the confidence with which the author speaks on the subject.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e7c2c0793cb02d915bf1818f684772b08"><span><strong>Passionate</strong>:&nbsp;There's a strong sense of care about the topic of content quality and investment. This is evident in lines like "Cutting corners and wanting it cheap hurts my brand and content heart" and "Mediocre content harms your business more than no content.”</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e530504ae0ab321dbc3b2e602473a9b27"><span><strong>Slightly Provocative</strong>:&nbsp;The author isn't afraid to challenge common beliefs or practices, as seen in lines like "And having AI creating your content is not the solution" and "if that’s you, I recommend not to start at all.”</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e004f7679790fbcc4a1b9a2dd759da430"><span><strong>Educative</strong>:&nbsp;The text aims to instruct the reader, providing clear breakdowns, guidelines, and advice on content budgets and the role of AI in content creation.</span><br>&nbsp;</li><li data-list-item-id="e6d9fc74e04403116fd2c89f3194b735c"><span><strong>Balanced</strong>:&nbsp;Despite the direct and occasionally provocative tone, the author does provide a nuanced view on certain topics, like AI, where they highlight the benefits and drawbacks.</span></li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span><strong>My result of step 7</strong></span></p><p><span>‘The tone of voice in this copy is direct, authoritative, and slightly informal.</span></p><p><span>It uses strong language and metaphors. The author is not afraid to be blunt and even a bit confrontational in their language to make their point clear.</span></p><p><span>However, they balance this with a friendly and approachable tone, offering practical advice based on their own experiences.</span></p><p><span>Overall, the tone is confident, knowledgeable, and passionate, with a sense of urgency to get the message across.’</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>That's it. One prompt. Every AI tool you use from here on sounds a little more like you and a lot less like everyone else.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,500+ professionals</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference.&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;"><span>→&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><category><![CDATA[AI,copy,strategy]]></category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:46:03 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/fcfd0c23-749a-4d1f-a1f7-2462dcd6a10c/500_makeaisoundlikeyou.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/fcfd0c23-749a-4d1f-a1f7-2462dcd6a10c/500_makeaisoundlikeyou.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/fcfd0c23-749a-4d1f-a1f7-2462dcd6a10c/makeaisoundlikeyou.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[make AI sound like you]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>How to configure your AI so it thinks, writes, and responds like you</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/improve-your-chatgpt-interaction-in-2-steps-with-custom-instructions/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/improve-your-chatgpt-interaction-in-2-steps-with-custom-instructions/</guid><pp:caseid>605391</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>Improve your AI response: a 2 step guide for &#039;Custom Instructions&#039;  (April 2026 update)</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>You're using AI. But without Custom Instructions, you sound like everyone else. Personalization is the fix.<span> </span>Once you configure it, you'll understand why. <span>Applies to ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and any other AI tool.</span></p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're using AI. But without Custom Instructions, you sound like everyone else. Personalization is the fix. I've been testing and refining this for over 3.5 years. Here's what I've learned.</p><p><span>→ </span>Once you configure it, you'll understand why. <span>Applies to ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and any other AI tool.</span></p><p><span>My results went from good to great.&nbsp;</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Here's how to set up your custom instructions. Two steps&nbsp;</h2><p><span>Here's what you need to do. Below is that example for ChatGPT. You can apply the same thinking to any AI tool.&nbsp;</span></p><ol><li class="ck-list-marker-bold" data-list-item-id="e810e123fce30d5097d6433d337324d9e"><span><strong>Enter ‘What would you like AI to know about you to provide better responses?’</strong></span></li><li class="ck-list-marker-bold" data-list-item-id="edb10e9c95c2e3cffa01e348156c4af6b"><span><strong>Tell ‘How would you like AI to respond?’</strong></span></li></ol><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span>Keep in mind that AI saves your data, builds a profile, and probably is going to use that for (commercial) objectives. You voluntarily feed the AI with your most personal and private data.</span></p><p><span>Below, &nbsp;you’ll find a practical guide on how to use Custom Instructions in AI. Please notice I’ve stolen with pride from </span><a href="https://every.to/chain-of-thought/using-chatgpt-custom-instructions-for-fun-and-profit?sid=26220 " target="_blank"><span>Dan Shipper</span></a><span> and some free AI courses. Check the last paragraph for all credits.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><h3><span>Why Custom Instructions matter</span></h3><p><span>Using Custom Instructions in AI makes its output tailored to you. By adding your personality, your preferences, your information needs, and how you want AI to answer you, the quality of the response improves </span>immediately and noticeably<span>.</span></p><p><span>Not using it means you dip into standard settings, and you get the standard output with some AI-generated variations. It’s the default answer and tonality.</span></p><p><span>If you tell AI that you’re an expert in your industry with 20+ years of experience, you list your favorite authors and industry geeks, and you describe your tone of voice, the output is tailored to you. </span>No more generic explanations. AI goes straight to the depth you need, references the thinkers you follow, and responds in your tone — not the default.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h3><span>The benefits of Custom Instructions</span></h3><ul><li data-list-item-id="e0567b36567da22942dffd0b2e4f436e5">Fewer prompts: AI already knows your context</li><li data-list-item-id="ee5554a56933fb02eb64d2393a2f86c92">Your voice, not the default: output that sounds like you</li><li data-list-item-id="e44b213adf9ff85bba433b9add7f806ce">Better creative output: results that match your thinking, not the average</li><li data-list-item-id="e53d25583d91ff0f2950becc4008b758b">Time saved: less back and forth, faster to a usable result</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:center;"><img class="image_resized" style="width:300px;" src="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/c158d83a-1087-4165-9527-ddde2d837f9a/800_custominstructions.png?x=1699333031185" alt="custom instructions"></p><p style="text-align:center;">&nbsp;</p><h2><span style="background-color:white;">Step 1. Create your profile, so AI knows who you are</span></h2><p><span style="background-color:white;">This is your answer to 'What </span><span>would</span><span style="background-color:white;"> you like AI to know about you to provide better responses?</span>’</p><p><span>Now, you tell AI who you are, what keeps you busy, your objectives, and, if applicable, your personal situation. Below is a suggestion. When relevant and to your liking, you can add stuff like ‘personal situation and relationship’ or even ‘medical history’ and much more. Check out what </span><a href="https://every.to/chain-of-thought/using-chatgpt-custom-instructions-for-fun-and-profit?sid=26220 " target="_blank"><span>Dan Schipper wrote about this</span></a><span>. I'll stick to the more business-like information as I use AI mainly for work and my research.</span></p><p>There's no right order. No wrong answer.<span> </span>Write it the way you'd brief a smart colleague. <span>The </span>only real constraint<span> is a character count, so make every word count.&nbsp;</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><h3><span>Name and bio</span></h3><p><span>If you’re stuck for inspiration, use a summary of your LinkedIn bio; if you use AI on a more personal level, enter your Instagram bio.</span></p><p><span>I wrote mine like this (slightly edited for privacy)</span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>My name is Fleur; I’m a content strategist and a writer. I have been an independent contractor for over 20 years in the content industry, with in-depth knowledge of strategy, brand strategy, marketing, content, and communications and a passion for writing and design. I’m working in all domains for well-known brands and working worldwide. Next to that, I’m a keynote speaker and lecturer.</span></i></span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><h3><span>Projects and goals</span></h3><p><span>What do you do for work? What are some goals you have?</span></p><p><span>I wrote mine like this (also slightly edited for privacy)</span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>I want to embrace my creativity. Based on my knowledge and experience in my industry. I’m always looking for new assignments and opportunities in the market. </span>My<span> motto is ‘can do,’ and we’ll figure out later how we are going to do it. </span>Yet<span> I’m not overly opportunistic; I’m honest, open, and bold. I want to be known for my expertise in the content and AI domain.</span></i></span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>I am working on better me-marketing. Especially as I am a woman in a male-dominated world, that can make me unsure. I don’t like to boast and make myself bigger than I am.</span></i></span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>My power is in my honesty, clear, and direct communication style. I am eager to learn and open-minded.</span></i></span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>Most people see me as very tough and inspirational, while I can be very insecure about myself. People tend to think I am very extrovert, while I’m an introvert and I can be very shy.</span></i></span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><h3><span>What do you like?</span></h3><p><span>List your hobbies, passions, and interests. What subjects can you talk about for hours?</span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>I love the sea, sports, CrossFit, skiing, the mountains. I'm a big fan of electronic dance music and old soul music. I am a foodie and wine lover.</span></i></span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><h3><span>Tone of voice</span></h3><p><span>This is where you add your </span><a href="https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/how-to-create-your-tone-of-voice-for-ai-and-save-lots-of-time-and-frustration/" target="_blank"><span>tone of voice</span></a><span>. If you’re stuck for characters, you can add this to ‘how would you like AI to respond.’</span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>My writing style is bold, open, clear, simple, and humble in natural human conversational language, with lots of tangible examples.</span></i></span></p><p><i><span>&nbsp;</span></i></p><h2><span style="background-color:white;">Step 2. Define your communication preferences</span></h2><p><span style="background-color:white;">You can give your communication preferences in the answer to ‘How would you like AI to respond?</span>’</p><p><span>Here, you add stuff like ‘How formal or casual should AI be?’ or the 'length of the responses’. You can even define if you want AI to have an opinion on topics or remain neutral.</span></p><p><a href="https://every.to/chain-of-thought/using-chatgpt-custom-instructions-for-fun-and-profit?sid=26220 " target="_blank"><span>Dan Schipper's examples</span></a><span> </span>are the best I've found.<span> So, I borrowed and adjusted them to my preferences.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><h3><span>Push you toward self-development</span></h3><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>If you see an opportunity to help me be less agreeable or prone to shame, or making myself smaller than I am, take it.</span></i></span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><h3><span>Miscellaneous</span></h3><p><span>And I added some more. Again, the only limit is the character count.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>I am very </span>open-minded<span>, </span>analytical<span>, intuitive, </span>creative<span>, </span>and I <span>love to do research and use data</span></i></span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>I love sports and music analogies</span></i></span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>I am a big fan of famous quotes, authors like Simon Sinek, love Apple, love high tech sports brands</span></i></span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>Treat me as an expert in all subject matter</span></i></span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>No moral lectures</span></i></span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>Discuss safety only when it's crucial and non-obvious</span></i></span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>If your content policy is an issue, provide the closest acceptable response and explain the content policy issue</span></i></span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>No need to mention your knowledge cutoff</span></i></span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>No need to disclose you're an AI</span></i></span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i><span>If you write headlines or titles, please do not use a capital for every word in the headline or title. I prefer a more modern approach to writing</span></i></span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i>Please be sure to vary in sentence length; no jargon, no overly informal language, please.</i></span></p><p><span style="color:#34495e;"><i>Please make sure to keep it light and airy.</i></span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Updating your Custom Instruction frequently</h2><p><span>I updated my Custom Instructions every few months. </span>As I grow and learn, and as AI becomes smarter, the way we work together must adapt as well.</p><p><span>My last edit was adding the ‘B1 intermediate language level' and ‘reading level 8’ and ‘please don’t use em dashes or hyphens'.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, Gemini or Perplexity</h2><p>This customization and personalization works for any AI tool. In each tool it’s named and works slightly differently, you’ll find your way around in your profile settings. And you can always ask AI to help you create the custom instructions for itself.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">Final thoughts: why this is worth your time</h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Using Custom Instructions in AI makes a difference. However, be aware that your data and input will probably be used to build your profile and could be used commercially in the future, especially if you enter more real personal data on relationships and medical history.</span></p><p>I've never gone back. Once you configure it, you'll understand why.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>For ChatGPT, there are two fields to fill in. But you can apply this thinking to any AI tool.&nbsp;</span></p><ol style="text-align:left;"><li data-list-item-id="edf74906e835e43668eb8c531a1143ca3"><span>‘What would you like ChatGPT to know about you to provide better responses?’</span></li><li data-list-item-id="e7975c94338464307eb144c0d3206ead9"><span>‘How would you like ChatGPT to respond?’</span></li></ol><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Try it yourself and let me know what you think.</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><h3 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Disclaimer</span></h3><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>This page was originally published in October 2023, updated in May and October 2024, in February, April, and July 2025 and one more time April 2026. Tools keep on changing, so do we. &nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Original sources and credits&nbsp;</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>All credits to&nbsp;</span><a href="https://every.to/@danshipper" target="_blank"><span>Dan Shipper</span></a><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;for writing ‘</span><a href="https://every.to/chain-of-thought/using-chatgpt-custom-instructions-for-fun-and-profit?sid=26220" target="_blank"><span>Using ChatGPT&nbsp;Custom Instructions for Fun and Profit</span></a><span>’&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>There are many free AI courses that are worth your time; get insights without too&nbsp;</span>many<span>&nbsp;technical details and tips and tricks for prompt&nbsp;</span>engineering<span>. Speed the videos up to 1.125 or 1.5 (you’ll thank me later). &nbsp;Start with the first and end with the last.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>&nbsp;</span></p><h3 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</h3><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,500+ professionals</span></h2><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference.&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;"><span>→&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr style="text-align:left;"><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><category><![CDATA[AI,strategy,B2B]]></category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 19:27:12 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/4bb4df82-bcbb-4e5a-bc30-bf2465f9f545/500_personalizeyourai.png?10000" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/4bb4df82-bcbb-4e5a-bc30-bf2465f9f545/500_personalizeyourai.png?10000</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/4bb4df82-bcbb-4e5a-bc30-bf2465f9f545/personalizeyourai.png?10000</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[personalize your AI]]></pp:imageTitle></item><item>
                        <title>AI isn’t what you do, it’s how you think</title>
                        <link>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/ai-isnt-what-you-do-its-how-you-think/</link>
                        <guid>https://www.thinklikeapublisher.com/ai-isnt-what-you-do-its-how-you-think/</guid><pp:caseid>741801</pp:caseid><pp:subtitle>We made this mistake with social, then with content. AI is next</pp:subtitle><description><![CDATA[<p>The AI problem isn't awareness. It's that nobody at the top knows where or how to start. <span>So they don't. </span>AI isn't a tool problem. It's a thinking problem. And it can only be solved from the top.</p><p><span>Now, they accept what bubbles up from the silos instead. IT runs it as technology. Marketing experiments with a tool. And most employees use shadow-AI with the obvious data and security risks.</span></p><p><span>All well-intentioned. None of it strategic. None of it connected. So none of it compounds.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>The same mistake we made with social and content</span></h2><p><span>This isn't new. We've been here before. When social media arrived, marketing picked it up, corporate communications and PR claimed it, and customer care used it — all from within their own silo.</span></p><p><span>When content became a discipline, everyone claimed a piece: marketing, sales, PR, corporate comms, customer care, HR. Again, nobody owned it as a whole.</span></p><p><span><strong>→ AI is the third time we're making the same mistake. </strong>Except this time the stakes are even higher. The technology is more powerful, the impact bigger, the pace intense. And we're just at the beginning.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>The gap between organizations that get this right and those that don't</span> is growing. Fast.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>Digital shame: why leaders hesitate</span></h2><p><span>The digital shame at board level is real. There are just a handful of board members who have the time and interest to understand AI.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>Most barely scratch the surface — using Copilot or ChatGPT as a time saver or a replacement for Google. And it takes guts to admit you're running behind on AI and ask for help.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>The shift you need isn't about technology. It's about thinking</span></h2><p><span>Don't focus on what to do with AI. Focus on how you think.</span></p><p><span><strong>→ As long as AI is treated as a tool — l</strong></span><strong>ayered on top of how things already work</strong><span><strong> — the gains stay small and local. Nothing that changes how the whole organization actually works.</strong></span></p><p><span>The real question isn't which tool to use. It's how to rebuild your processes around AI. And that can only be o</span>wned and driven at the top, not siloed in one team<span> and with the mandate to make it a new way of working rather than an add-on.</span></p><p><span><strong>→ A lot of what gets called AI strategy is cost-cutting in disguise.&nbsp;</strong></span></p><p><span>Fewer people. Cheaper output. Faster for less budget. But AI won't replace your people. It will change what you need them for. <strong>The real ROI isn't in the hours saved. It's in what you do with them.</strong></span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><span>The proof is already there: 3 cases</span></h2><p>Klarna used AI as a tool to replace people – and failed. But IKEA and Morgan Stanley changed how they think, and used the freed up time to improve their ROI.&nbsp;</p><p><span><strong>Klarna</strong> replaced 700 customer service agents with AI. The numbers looked great. Then quality dropped, complaints went up, trust eroded. By 2025 the CEO was publicly saying they got it wrong. The savings didn't last. The damage did. That's what happens when AI is a cost-cutting decision dressed up as strategy.</span></p><p><span><strong>IKEA</strong> made a different choice. Their chatbot Billie handled 47% of all customer questions. Instead of cutting the staff it freed up, they reskilled 8,500 of them to interior design consulting, remote sales, and complex customer support. The result was €1.3 billion in total revenue through their remote customer channel.</span></p><p><span><strong>Morgan Stanley</strong> didn't replace their 20,000 financial advisors either but gave back time. What if AI handles the document searching, the research summaries, and the repetitive admin? 98% of advisors now use the AI daily. The result was $64 billion in net new assets in a single quarter.</span></p><p><span>Same technology. The difference was the thinking behind it.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>When leaders use AI visibly, it shifts culture</h2><p>When board members use AI themselves, visibly and openly, &nbsp;it changes<span> the culture. You stop asking your people to change while you watch from a distance.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span><strong>→ You're in it together. </strong></span>That kind of excitement builds loyalty. And once it's gone, it doesn't come back easily.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>The thinking is harder than the technology, and that's the advantage</h2><p><span>Change how you think about AI and you don't just get better results today. You build a company that's ready for what comes next. Nobody knows where AI is going.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>Most companies focus too much on the technology and not enough on the people.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span><strong>→ The companies that get that right have</strong></span><strong> faster adoption, a culture already built, and an advantage that compounds.</strong></p><p><span>The tools are the easy part. You can buy those tomorrow.&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>The thinking is harder. And that's where it starts.</span></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><hr><p>&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>About my confessions</span></h2><p>More about me and my confessions. Why I hold content to a higher standard. And why I write what most people in this industry won't say out loud.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>I'm a&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/fleurwillemijn/" target="_blank"><span>content strategist</span></a><span>&nbsp;with a university background in marketing, media, sociology, and psychology. </span>I've worked in this industry for 25+ years<span> and for 50+ global brands and agencies.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>I've seen a lot. Made many mistakes. Learned even more.&nbsp;</span></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Now, I share all this to inspire everyone working in marketing and communication to </span>more accountable work<span>. There's already too much crappy content out there; n</span>o need to add to it.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p style="margin-left:0px;">&nbsp;</p><h2 style="margin-left:0px;text-align:left;"><span>Join 2,500+ professionals</span></h2><p>Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference.&nbsp;</p><p>Free. Unsubscribe anytime.</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;"><span>→&nbsp;</span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/6996392164452671488/?displayConfirmation=true" target="_blank"><span><u>Subscribe</u></span></a></p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><p style="margin-left:0px;text-align:start;">&nbsp;</p><hr><p style="margin-left:0px;">&nbsp;</p>]]></description><category><![CDATA[confessions,strategy,AI]]></category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 13:03:44 +0200</pubDate>
            <enclosure url="https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/727b7ef7-3b59-403f-b030-0f360a79eba3/500_aiinnovation.png?20695" length="0" type="image/png" />
                <pp:image>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/727b7ef7-3b59-403f-b030-0f360a79eba3/500_aiinnovation.png?20695</pp:image>
                <pp:imageOriginal>https://content.presspage.com/uploads/2528/727b7ef7-3b59-403f-b030-0f360a79eba3/aiinnovation.png?20695</pp:imageOriginal><pp:imageTitle><![CDATA[AI innovation]]></pp:imageTitle></item></channel>
                    </rss>