AI-generated or having an em dash is not a quality signal
Just because something looks low effort doesn’t mean it’s low quality
Someone tells you it's AI-generated. You've already decided: low effort, low quality. And you haven't read a word yet.
You're not entirely wrong. A lot of AI content is bad.
But you're wrong about why.
You see the 2 minutes of AI, not the 2 hours of preperation
Before AI, the effort was in the writing. First ugly drafts. Countless revisions. Tuning and tweaking over time. You saw the labor because it looked like labor.
→ Now all the work happens before a single word is written.
The AI configuration. The context-loading. Challenging the angle. It's all in the brief that took two hours to write. All so AI creates the output in two minutes.
Because you can't see any of that prework, you assume it isn't there.
AI doesn't create mediocrity; people do
AI doesn't create mediocrity. People do.
AI doesn't produce bad content. People without craft do. They always have. Now they're just faster.
→ The strong writer who can now produce strong content in a few minutes hasn't eliminated the work. They've moved it upstream.
From writing into preparation and thinking. Learning how to direct machines effectively. Configuring their AI so the output reflects their standards and voice. Writing the brief. Making decisions before a single word is generated.
All of that effort is invisible to you. That's why the result looks effortless.
Craftsmanship isn’t overhead, it’s your quality control.
AI didn't lower the bar, you did
The real quality signal is not whether it's AI. Stop reading AI-generated content like it's evidence.
Read it as if you didn't know how it was made.
About my confessions
More about me and my confessions. Why I hold content to a higher standard. And why I write what most people in this industry won't say out loud.
I'm a content strategist with a university background in marketing, media, sociology, and psychology. I've worked in this industry for 25+ years and for 50+ global brands and agencies.
I've seen a lot. Made many mistakes. Learned even more.
Now, I share all this to inspire everyone working in marketing and communication to more accountable work. There's already too much crappy content out there; no need to add to it.
Join 2,500+ professionals
Most content advice tells you what to do. This tells you how to think. For marketers and communicators who want the difference.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Confessions of a Content Strategist
The em dash is not a red flag; it’s a beat that a comma can’t land
Don't judge copy by an em dash
Scanning copy for em dashes like they're evidence of AI? Let's be honest about what that is. It's lazy. The same kind of lazy as writers who let AI write for them without thinking. You're just doing it from the other side of the …
AI isn’t what you do, it’s how you think
We made this mistake with social, then with content. AI is next
The AI problem isn't awareness. It's that nobody at the top knows where or how to start. So they don't. AI isn't a tool problem. It's a thinking problem. And it can only be solved from the top.
Now, they accept what …
'More content' is not a strategy
Marketing is optimizing for the wrong variable. And you're letting it happen
The market is drowning in content. And marketing's response is to make more. AI made it cheaper, so the assumption became: produce more, reach more, grow more.
But volume was never the problem to solve. And ‘more’ has never been the answer.
AI cuts content costs with just ~10%, if you want to keep quality
About the sense and nonsense of AI cost savings for your content
Using AI for content production can save you up to 40% of your time. This sounds like the magic trick to lower the costs of your content team, right?
Well, sorry to bring the bad news; it isn’t.
→ Yes, …
You’re making too much content
Tired of content for content’s sake, overwhelmed by volume, and eager to drive impact
How much content do you need? It’s much less than you think. About 10% of your content drives 90% of your traffic. If that isn’t 5-95 by now, thanks to AI overviews now replacing clicks in Google search results.
We’re in …
LinkedIn: don't take it too seriously and dial it down
This one’s personal, staying human is the only hill worth dying on here
Forget the hacks and growth tricks. LinkedIn engagement comes down to a few simple things. It’s not rocket science. It’s barely science.
It’s not about going viral or chasing a one-off hit. It’s about building real connections: they like …